President Donald Trump poses such a threat to American democracy and international security that the people who still support him need a “very bad burn” to snapPresident Donald Trump poses such a threat to American democracy and international security that the people who still support him need a “very bad burn” to snap

Trump supporters need a 'very bad burn' to snap out of their delusion: conservative

2026/03/25 03:11
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

President Donald Trump poses such a threat to American democracy and international security that the people who still support him need a “very bad burn” to snap out of their delusion, a prominent conservative columnist argued on Tuesday.

Observing that he was criticized for expressing glee at the prospect of the Iran war increasing energy prices, leading to job losses, hurting the stock market, exacerbating inflation and causing rising drug prices, The Bulwark’s Jonathan V. Last explained he does not take joy in vulnerable people suffering.

The problem is that, like a child which must learn to avoid extreme heat by touching a hot stove, America must learn the dangers of far right politicians by being exposed to the harsh consequences of their policies.

“At root, there are only two possible explanations for the Trump era,” Last explained. “A controlling plurality of Americans affirmatively want Trump and the Republican party’s post-liberal, authoritarian vision. Or, Americans don’t want post-liberalism—not really. They don’t even know what post-liberalism means. They’ve just voted for Trump because his terrible governance hasn’t impacted their lives. If they felt the real-world consequences of Trumpism, then they’d reject its illiberalism.”

If it is indeed the latter scenario, which Last said he hopes is the case, “our fellow Americans are capable of changing their minds from getting burnt by the stove,” meaning “we are all going to have to absorb the pain.”

He added, “I say: Bring it on. Because what’s the alternative?” In fact, Last pointed out, it is quite possible that Trump has administered so many little shocks to the American body politics — a January 6th insurrection here, blatant conflicts of interest there, constant lying, a proven link with a convicted child sex trafficker (one of whose victims accused him of sexual assault) — that “what we need is a true shock to the system,” Last opined, “bad outcomes so far outside the normative window that voters rebel and wake up to the reality of what they’ve been excusing and accepting.”

He concluded, “In which case a very bad burn is exactly what we (as a society) need—even if it means pain being dealt to many people who don’t deserve it.” For those who fear Trump might use the military to stay in power illegitimately, Last offered one last hopeful note.

“One of my worries about 2026 and 2028 is that Trump might try to use the U.S. military to assist in overturning the results of an election—and that he would have a sympathetic core of senior officers at the Pentagon,” Last wrote. “The Iran war makes this less likely. I suspect professional soldiers are spooked by Trump’s utter incompetence. No minimally competent officer could look at the president’s conduct during this war and think, ‘Yes, I should violate my oath to the Constitution to help this guy stay in power.’”

Last is not alone among conservatives calling out Trump’s bad behavior and saying it will eventually disgust and/or harm his constituents.

“Voters are rarely able to connect policy to outcomes, but they have done so in the case of tariffs,” The Bulwark’s Mona Charen recently wrote. “Back in 2024, Americans were about equally divided on the question of trade, with some favoring higher tariffs and roughly similar numbers opting for lower tariffs. Experience has changed their views.”

Similarly bro-MAGA influencer Joe Rogan, one of the president’s biggest supporters during the 2024 presidential election, has harshly criticized the president for things like invading Iran despite running as an antiwar candidate.

“But it just seems so insane based on what he ran on,” Rogan said. “I mean, this is why a lot of people feel betrayed, right? He ran on no more wars and these stupid senseless wars, and then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it.”

“It just doesn’t make any sense to me – unless we’re acting on someone else’s interests, like particularly Israel’s interests,” Rogan added. “It just didn’t make any sense to me.”

He also was upset about Trump’s links to Epstein.

“Like, what is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration,” Rogan said. “It looks f—— terrible. It looks terrible.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.292
$3.292$3.292
+0.45%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Circle Expands USDC Into Africa Through Sasai Deal, Targeting Cross-Border Payments Boom

Circle Expands USDC Into Africa Through Sasai Deal, Targeting Cross-Border Payments Boom

USDC integration into Sasai signals rising stablecoin demand for cross-border trade and FX stability in Africa. Circle Internet Group agreed to a landmark partnership
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 06:39
USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

PANews reported on September 17 that according to Whale Alert , at 23:48 Beijing time, USDC Treasury minted 250 million new USDC (approximately US$250 million) on the Solana blockchain .
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:51