The post TaskUs accused of “silencing” employees investigating Coinbase data breach  appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An amended lawsuit filed against U.S.-based outsourcing firm TaskUs claims the company concealed key information regarding the Coinbase data breach and downplayed the scale of insider involvement. Summary Amended lawsuit alleges TaskUs concealed details of the Coinbase data breach. TaskUs Employee Ashita Mishra is accused of leading the scheme that exposed data of more than 69,000 Coinbase customers. According to Greenbaum Olbrantz, the law firm that originally brought the class action in May and filed the amended complaint on Tuesday, a TaskUs employee named Ashita Mishra is at the center of the scheme that reportedly affected more than 69,000 customers of the exchange. Coinbase disclosed the breach in May, saying it had reimbursed impacted users, notified regulators, and cut ties with TaskUs while tightening its internal security controls.  Mishra, along with other unnamed accomplices, allegedly stole confidential information about Coinbase customers between September and January and sold it to the hackers who used it to impersonate Coinbase employees and steal crypto from unaware victims. Coinbase, however, has previously claimed that the breach transpired in December. “Ms. Mishra was part of a sophisticated hub-and-spoke conspiracy that funneled Coinbase customer data from TaskUs computers to criminals at the center of the conspiracy,” the lawsuit claims, citing a TaskUs employee charged with investigating the breach. Mishra and another key accomplice reportedly operated “circles of disconnected TaskUs employees” who were not aware that others were also involved in the scheme, a structure designed to “continue exfiltrating highly sensitive PII from TaskUs even if one of the spokes in the conspiracy was caught,” the filing added. Bad actors allegedly paid Mishra and her team $200 for every photo that contained Coinbase data, and according to an earlier complaint from Coinbase, she sometimes took as many as 200 photos a day. At the time when TaskUS… The post TaskUs accused of “silencing” employees investigating Coinbase data breach  appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An amended lawsuit filed against U.S.-based outsourcing firm TaskUs claims the company concealed key information regarding the Coinbase data breach and downplayed the scale of insider involvement. Summary Amended lawsuit alleges TaskUs concealed details of the Coinbase data breach. TaskUs Employee Ashita Mishra is accused of leading the scheme that exposed data of more than 69,000 Coinbase customers. According to Greenbaum Olbrantz, the law firm that originally brought the class action in May and filed the amended complaint on Tuesday, a TaskUs employee named Ashita Mishra is at the center of the scheme that reportedly affected more than 69,000 customers of the exchange. Coinbase disclosed the breach in May, saying it had reimbursed impacted users, notified regulators, and cut ties with TaskUs while tightening its internal security controls.  Mishra, along with other unnamed accomplices, allegedly stole confidential information about Coinbase customers between September and January and sold it to the hackers who used it to impersonate Coinbase employees and steal crypto from unaware victims. Coinbase, however, has previously claimed that the breach transpired in December. “Ms. Mishra was part of a sophisticated hub-and-spoke conspiracy that funneled Coinbase customer data from TaskUs computers to criminals at the center of the conspiracy,” the lawsuit claims, citing a TaskUs employee charged with investigating the breach. Mishra and another key accomplice reportedly operated “circles of disconnected TaskUs employees” who were not aware that others were also involved in the scheme, a structure designed to “continue exfiltrating highly sensitive PII from TaskUs even if one of the spokes in the conspiracy was caught,” the filing added. Bad actors allegedly paid Mishra and her team $200 for every photo that contained Coinbase data, and according to an earlier complaint from Coinbase, she sometimes took as many as 200 photos a day. At the time when TaskUS…

TaskUs accused of “silencing” employees investigating Coinbase data breach

An amended lawsuit filed against U.S.-based outsourcing firm TaskUs claims the company concealed key information regarding the Coinbase data breach and downplayed the scale of insider involvement.

Summary

  • Amended lawsuit alleges TaskUs concealed details of the Coinbase data breach.
  • TaskUs Employee Ashita Mishra is accused of leading the scheme that exposed data of more than 69,000 Coinbase customers.

According to Greenbaum Olbrantz, the law firm that originally brought the class action in May and filed the amended complaint on Tuesday, a TaskUs employee named Ashita Mishra is at the center of the scheme that reportedly affected more than 69,000 customers of the exchange.

Coinbase disclosed the breach in May, saying it had reimbursed impacted users, notified regulators, and cut ties with TaskUs while tightening its internal security controls. 

Mishra, along with other unnamed accomplices, allegedly stole confidential information about Coinbase customers between September and January and sold it to the hackers who used it to impersonate Coinbase employees and steal crypto from unaware victims. Coinbase, however, has previously claimed that the breach transpired in December.

“Ms. Mishra was part of a sophisticated hub-and-spoke conspiracy that funneled Coinbase customer data from TaskUs computers to criminals at the center of the conspiracy,” the lawsuit claims, citing a TaskUs employee charged with investigating the breach.

Mishra and another key accomplice reportedly operated “circles of disconnected TaskUs employees” who were not aware that others were also involved in the scheme, a structure designed to “continue exfiltrating highly sensitive PII from TaskUs even if one of the spokes in the conspiracy was caught,” the filing added.

Bad actors allegedly paid Mishra and her team $200 for every photo that contained Coinbase data, and according to an earlier complaint from Coinbase, she sometimes took as many as 200 photos a day. At the time when TaskUS was made aware of the breach, her phone allegedly contained information about more than 10,000 Coinbase customers. 

TaskUS allegedly concealed information

Other allegations in the amended lawsuit center around TaskUS, which allegedly “took steps to silence those with knowledge of the breach.”

The company had previously fired nearly 300 employees from its office in Indore, India, and the filing claims this was done because the conspiracy had “so pervasively infiltrated TaskUs’ systems that TaskUs could not identify all of the individuals involved.”

TaskUS also reportedly disbanded its human resource team and fired staff members who were tasked with investigating the breach, which the amended suit claims was a “a pattern of concealment.”

“Upon information and belief, TaskUs terminated those employees to conceal the true

extent of its security failures,” the suit added.

Among other irregularities was a Form 10-K filing from TaskUs in February, where it failed to disclose its involvement in the Coinbase breach, effectively signaling to regulators and investors that the company was “not aware of any material data breaches” at the time.

According to earlier findings, a group of hackers identifying themselves as “the Comm” is suspected to be the masterminds behind the incident. Even though the incident did not involve any loss of funds from the exchange, bad actors getting access to sensitive customer information has raised concerns about identity theft and phishing risks for affected users.

Source: https://crypto.news/taskus-accused-of-silencing-employees-investigating-coinbase-data-breach/

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002654
$0.002654$0.002654
+9.62%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Cappfinity is pleased to announce the promotion of Stephanie Hopper to the role of Chief Talent Management Officer, marking
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 15:30
TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

The post TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX is consolidating at the $0.31 level while showing a short-term bullish tendency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 15:27