The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that… The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that…

Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market

  • Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face.
  • Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading.
  • Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks.

A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform.

25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated

Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure.

The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants.

Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading

According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude. 

In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that will prevent traders from cancelling orders until after 15 seconds. According to him, it would discourage manipulators from placing orders they do not intend to fill, thereby curtailing their ability to deceive other participants, particularly retail traders playing by the rules.

Two Kinds of Risks in Crypto Trading

It is worth noting that trading in cryptocurrencies involves significant risks. Most of the risks considered are typical and unavoidable; therefore, crypto traders must learn to manage their portfolios. However, artificially engineered risks add to the complications surrounding cryptocurrency trading and investment, leading many users to advocate for institutional support in the form of rules to guide and protect them from avoidable risks.

Related :  ZachXBT Issues Warning on ZEUS Token, Citing Founders’ Links to Market Manipulation

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/crypto-analyst-decries-the-negative-effect-of-wash-trading-on-the-crypto-market/

Market Opportunity
Effect AI Logo
Effect AI Price(EFFECT)
$0.005086
$0.005086$0.005086
-0.43%
USD
Effect AI (EFFECT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X Announces Higher Creator Payouts on Platform

X Announces Higher Creator Payouts on Platform

X boosts creator payouts with Musk's new initiative, leading to increased earnings for creators.
Share
CoinLive2026/01/19 01:45
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
New tech seen cutting hatchery reliance on wild mangrove crabs

New tech seen cutting hatchery reliance on wild mangrove crabs

MINDANAO State University’s Iligan Institute of Technology is developing a recirculating aquaculture system to improve hatchery survival rates for mangrove crabs
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/19 00:03