The firm argues that the cryptocurrency’s historical models—especially the once-popular stock-to-flow (S2F) theory—no longer provide an accurate reflection of current […] The post Diminishing Returns Signal a New Era for Bitcoin, Analysts Warn appeared first on Coindoo.The firm argues that the cryptocurrency’s historical models—especially the once-popular stock-to-flow (S2F) theory—no longer provide an accurate reflection of current […] The post Diminishing Returns Signal a New Era for Bitcoin, Analysts Warn appeared first on Coindoo.

Diminishing Returns Signal a New Era for Bitcoin, Analysts Warn

2025/10/29 02:10

The firm argues that the cryptocurrency’s historical models—especially the once-popular stock-to-flow (S2F) theory—no longer provide an accurate reflection of current market dynamics, as the asset matures and investor behavior evolves.

The report, released on October 28, 2025, highlights what analysts describe as “diminishing returns” for Bitcoin. While such a trend is often viewed as a normal symptom of maturity for any growing financial asset, 10x Research says it raises deeper questions about whether Bitcoin’s famous four-year cycle—tied to its halving events—still holds any real predictive value.

Maturity or Exhaustion? The Debate Deepens

Bitcoin has historically followed a repeating pattern: a halving event reduces supply growth, enthusiasm builds, a parabolic rally follows, and eventually, the market collapses into a multi-month correction. This cyclical structure has shaped both investor sentiment and institutional forecasts for more than a decade.

However, 10x Research suggests that the market’s increasing sophistication and changing macroeconomic backdrop may be breaking this pattern. The analysts note that drawing firm conclusions from just three or four past cycles offers limited statistical credibility. “We are now at a point where Bitcoin’s evolution cannot be captured by simplistic historical repetition,” the report implies, urging investors to move away from overreliance on halving-based forecasts.

Stock-to-Flow Model’s Decline in Credibility

Once heralded as the gold standard for Bitcoin valuation, the stock-to-flow model aimed to quantify scarcity by comparing the existing circulating supply with the rate of new issuance. During Bitcoin’s early years, this framework appeared remarkably accurate, mapping each halving event to an exponential price rise.

But 10x Research points out that the model’s reliability collapsed during the 2021 cycle, when it predicted a surge beyond $100,000 that never materialized. According to the firm, the flaw lay in the model’s overemphasis on supply while disregarding Bitcoin’s demand-driven characteristics—particularly the influence of institutional flows, macroeconomic liquidity, and retail participation.

Despite this, the research group notes that their modified version of the stock-to-flow framework successfully identified the bear-market bottom in October 2022. This outcome, they argue, demonstrates that while the model may still hold limited tactical utility, it is no longer suitable for long-term projections in a changing market structure.

New Models, New Insights

The firm’s latest data suggests that Bitcoin’s price trajectory now aligns less with rigid halving expectations and more with demand elasticity, macro trends, and broader adoption patterns. In their July 2023 analysis, 10x Research projected that the current cycle could carry Bitcoin toward $125,000—a more modest target than the million-dollar narratives popularized by some analysts.

READ MORE:

Bitcoin Price Could Stay Above $100,000 Forever, Standard Chartered Warns Bears

Since then, their perspective has evolved further. As Bitcoin’s market cap grows and volatility compresses, the potential for extreme parabolic rallies diminishes. The firm emphasizes that this moderation is not necessarily bearish but indicative of a natural transition into a more stable, mature asset class.

Chart Patterns Indicate Waning Post-Halving Power

Supporting their argument, 10x Research published a logarithmic regression chart illustrating Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory since 2011. The visualization highlights each halving phase, marking prior peaks at approximately $505 in 2014, $9,074 in 2017, and $121,059 in 2021 (on a logarithmic scale). While each cycle produced exponential gains, the rate of return between halvings has clearly tapered.

The chart also raises an intriguing question: is a bear market now emerging 400 days after the most recent halving? If history rhymes rather than repeats, the pattern could suggest shorter, more compressed bull markets—less explosive than before but potentially more sustainable over time.

Psychological and Structural Shifts in the Market

Beyond technical models, the report underscores how shifting investor psychology may be reshaping Bitcoin’s behavior. As retail participation declines in relative influence and institutional capital dominates, the market may respond more to macroeconomic factors—such as global interest rates, risk appetite, and dollar liquidity—than to internal supply events.

10x Research characterizes this as the “institutionalization of Bitcoin,” where its value responds to capital cycles rather than block reward halvings. This marks a sharp contrast from the earlier era of speculative retail booms driven by viral excitement and scarcity narratives.

A More Realistic Future for Bitcoin

While some analysts continue to promote extreme price forecasts—citing targets as high as $1 million—the report cautions that such projections rely on outdated logic. Instead, it proposes a more data-driven approach that combines on-chain activity, macroeconomic conditions, and behavioral indicators.

According to 10x Research, this recalibrated methodology aligns more closely with how Bitcoin actually performs in today’s complex financial environment. “The evolution of cycle dynamics reflects not a loss of faith, but a transition into a new phase of market maturity,” the analysts write.

Ultimately, the firm sees this as a healthy development—one that moves Bitcoin from speculative cycles toward sustainable valuation patterns, guided less by hype and more by long-term adoption.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Diminishing Returns Signal a New Era for Bitcoin, Analysts Warn appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
ERA Logo
ERA Price(ERA)
$0.2045
$0.2045$0.2045
+0.24%
USD
ERA (ERA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00