The post Elon Musk Vs. Joyce Carol Oates—The Online Feud, Explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla and SpaceX’s CEO Elon Musk. (Photo by Kirsty Wigglesworth – WPA Pool/Getty Images) Getty Images Billionaire Elon Musk and author Joyce Carol Oates are clashing on Musk’s own social media platform, X, formerly known as Twitter. What Happened Between Elon Musk and Joyce Carol Oates? Fierce criticism of Elon Musk is a regular occurrence on X, as Musk has made many unpopular changes to the platform. There is a possibility that Musk might become the world’s first trillionaire, a position of wealth that was once considered the stuff of science fiction. After Musk responded defensively to a post criticizing his Tesla pay package, Joyce Carol Oates made a simple observation. Out of the blue, Oates delivered a devastating takedown, pointing out that Musk never seems to post about the joys of life. Oates wrote: “So curious that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates— scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.'” The post quickly went viral, and Musk couldn’t bring himself to ignore it. First, Musk called the post “demonstrably false” and described Oates as a “lazy liar.” Then, Musk wrote, “Oates is a liar and delights in being mean. Not a good human.” Next, Musk tried insulting Oates’ writing, stating, “Eating a bag of sawdust would be vastly more enjoyable than reading the laboriously pretentious drivel of Oates.”… The post Elon Musk Vs. Joyce Carol Oates—The Online Feud, Explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla and SpaceX’s CEO Elon Musk. (Photo by Kirsty Wigglesworth – WPA Pool/Getty Images) Getty Images Billionaire Elon Musk and author Joyce Carol Oates are clashing on Musk’s own social media platform, X, formerly known as Twitter. What Happened Between Elon Musk and Joyce Carol Oates? Fierce criticism of Elon Musk is a regular occurrence on X, as Musk has made many unpopular changes to the platform. There is a possibility that Musk might become the world’s first trillionaire, a position of wealth that was once considered the stuff of science fiction. After Musk responded defensively to a post criticizing his Tesla pay package, Joyce Carol Oates made a simple observation. Out of the blue, Oates delivered a devastating takedown, pointing out that Musk never seems to post about the joys of life. Oates wrote: “So curious that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates— scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.'” The post quickly went viral, and Musk couldn’t bring himself to ignore it. First, Musk called the post “demonstrably false” and described Oates as a “lazy liar.” Then, Musk wrote, “Oates is a liar and delights in being mean. Not a good human.” Next, Musk tried insulting Oates’ writing, stating, “Eating a bag of sawdust would be vastly more enjoyable than reading the laboriously pretentious drivel of Oates.”…

Elon Musk Vs. Joyce Carol Oates—The Online Feud, Explained

Tesla and SpaceX’s CEO Elon Musk. (Photo by Kirsty Wigglesworth – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Billionaire Elon Musk and author Joyce Carol Oates are clashing on Musk’s own social media platform, X, formerly known as Twitter.

What Happened Between Elon Musk and Joyce Carol Oates?

Fierce criticism of Elon Musk is a regular occurrence on X, as Musk has made many unpopular changes to the platform.

There is a possibility that Musk might become the world’s first trillionaire, a position of wealth that was once considered the stuff of science fiction.

After Musk responded defensively to a post criticizing his Tesla pay package, Joyce Carol Oates made a simple observation.

Out of the blue, Oates delivered a devastating takedown, pointing out that Musk never seems to post about the joys of life.

Oates wrote:

“So curious that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates— scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.'”

The post quickly went viral, and Musk couldn’t bring himself to ignore it.

First, Musk called the post “demonstrably false” and described Oates as a “lazy liar.” Then, Musk wrote, “Oates is a liar and delights in being mean. Not a good human.”

Next, Musk tried insulting Oates’ writing, stating, “Eating a bag of sawdust would be vastly more enjoyable than reading the laboriously pretentious drivel of Oates.”

Musk shifted direction, replying under a movie account posting about Edge of Tomorrow, describing it as a “Great movie.”

Minutes later, Musk returned to the topic of Joyce Carol Oates, proposing that she “must be a real downer at parties.”

Perhaps in an effort to appear well-read, Musk then wrote a post recommending the audiobook of Homer’s The Iliad (at 1.25 speed), but included a link to Homer’s The Odyssey by mistake. Musk soon deleted the tweet, but the internet never forgets.

Many X users watched the drama unfold in delight, adding their own commentary and posting memes about the feud.

Oates is known to be a prolific and quick-witted poster on X, and she swooped back in for the kill with another post mocking the world’s richest man, writing “whatever club he’s invited to join has been devalued by the invitation.”

Oates also made a post complimenting Vivian Wilson, known as Elon Musk’s estranged daughter, writing, “A normal parent would be very proud.”

Mercilessly mocking Elon Musk is an incredibly common activity on X—the world’s richest man can buy an entire social media platform and bend it to his will, but he can’t force the site’s userbase to like him.

Oates’ commentary about Musk’s appreciation of art echoes the critical commentary that arose after the world’s richest man was suspected of pretending to be extremely good at video games.

Notably, Musk praised the best-selling FromSoft videogame Elden Ring “as the most beautiful art I have ever seen.”

Unfortunately, Musk greatly diminished his credibility in the gaming community after posting his Elden Ring build, which proved so bafflingly inept that it became a meme.

After the feud had died down, Musk resumed his usual X activity, posting positive commentary about Tesla and Grok.

Thanks to Oates, we might well see more literary and film recommendations from the world’s richest man in the future.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesGamers Suspect That Elon Musk Is Faking ItForbesElon Musk Vs. Asmongold—The Gaming Feud, ExplainedForbesTikTok’s ‘Group 7’ Meme, ExplainedForbes‘South Park’ Tackles The 6-7 Meme, And The Antichrist

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/11/elon-musk-vs-joyce-carol-oates-the-online-feud-explained/

Market Opportunity
Dogelon Mars Logo
Dogelon Mars Price(ELON)
$0.00000005068
$0.00000005068$0.00000005068
-1.74%
USD
Dogelon Mars (ELON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Red Dog Pet Resort & Spa Selects MoeGo as Its Enterprise Operating System to Power Multi-State Expansion

Red Dog Pet Resort & Spa Selects MoeGo as Its Enterprise Operating System to Power Multi-State Expansion

MoeGo Becomes Enterprise Operating System for Red Dog Pet Resort & Spa to Standardize and Scale Nationwide Operations BOSTON, Dec. 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Red Dog
Share
AI Journal2025/12/30 02:45
Russia’s Sberbank Issues First Crypto Loan Using Bitcoin as Collateral

Russia’s Sberbank Issues First Crypto Loan Using Bitcoin as Collateral

TLDR Sberbank issued a pilot crypto-backed loan to Bitcoin miner Intelion Data. Bitcoin mined by Intelion Data was used as collateral for the loan. The bank secured
Share
Coincentral2025/12/30 02:33