The post Elon Musk’s Wikipedia Competitor Grokipedia Launches To Combat Media Bias appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk has finally launched his AI-powered and “truth” focused answer to Wikipedia on Monday — Grokipedia — amid ongoing beef with the incumbent platform over its editorial practices.  In a series of posts via X on Monday following the launch, Musk stated that Grokipedia “is fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost” and that its goal is to “truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.” “We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal,” Musk added.  One X user already noticed a difference between the articles about George Floyd, an African-American man who a Florida police officer killed during an arrest. The user noticed that the first paragraph of the Grokipedia article highlighted Floyd’s extended criminal record, while the Wikipedia article emphasized that he was killed by a “white” police officer. Grokipedia vs Wikipedia. Source: Elon Musk The service had been pushed back a few days, as Musk halted the launch to “purge out the propaganda” on Grokipedia.    It reportedly crashed temporarily after launch before promptly coming back online.  At the time of writing, the site is fully functional and claims to host over 885,000 articles so far. While details are still sparse on the specific processes behind Grokipedia, at first glance, its AI-integrations mark quite a different organizational structure from Wikipedia.  In Grokipedia’s case, X’s Grok AI appears to take the lead in dictating and moderating content on the platform, while Wikipedia relies on a blend of editorial volunteers and automated tools. Related: X launches market for inactive handles amid push to monetize digital identity Musk explained on Monday that users will be able to add or request changes to content on Grokipedia, with the AI making the final decision.  “Grok generated about 1M articles using… The post Elon Musk’s Wikipedia Competitor Grokipedia Launches To Combat Media Bias appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk has finally launched his AI-powered and “truth” focused answer to Wikipedia on Monday — Grokipedia — amid ongoing beef with the incumbent platform over its editorial practices.  In a series of posts via X on Monday following the launch, Musk stated that Grokipedia “is fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost” and that its goal is to “truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.” “We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal,” Musk added.  One X user already noticed a difference between the articles about George Floyd, an African-American man who a Florida police officer killed during an arrest. The user noticed that the first paragraph of the Grokipedia article highlighted Floyd’s extended criminal record, while the Wikipedia article emphasized that he was killed by a “white” police officer. Grokipedia vs Wikipedia. Source: Elon Musk The service had been pushed back a few days, as Musk halted the launch to “purge out the propaganda” on Grokipedia.    It reportedly crashed temporarily after launch before promptly coming back online.  At the time of writing, the site is fully functional and claims to host over 885,000 articles so far. While details are still sparse on the specific processes behind Grokipedia, at first glance, its AI-integrations mark quite a different organizational structure from Wikipedia.  In Grokipedia’s case, X’s Grok AI appears to take the lead in dictating and moderating content on the platform, while Wikipedia relies on a blend of editorial volunteers and automated tools. Related: X launches market for inactive handles amid push to monetize digital identity Musk explained on Monday that users will be able to add or request changes to content on Grokipedia, with the AI making the final decision.  “Grok generated about 1M articles using…

Elon Musk’s Wikipedia Competitor Grokipedia Launches To Combat Media Bias

Elon Musk has finally launched his AI-powered and “truth” focused answer to Wikipedia on Monday — Grokipedia — amid ongoing beef with the incumbent platform over its editorial practices. 

In a series of posts via X on Monday following the launch, Musk stated that Grokipedia “is fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost” and that its goal is to “truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

“We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal,” Musk added. 

One X user already noticed a difference between the articles about George Floyd, an African-American man who a Florida police officer killed during an arrest.

The user noticed that the first paragraph of the Grokipedia article highlighted Floyd’s extended criminal record, while the Wikipedia article emphasized that he was killed by a “white” police officer.

Grokipedia vs Wikipedia. Source: Elon Musk

The service had been pushed back a few days, as Musk halted the launch to “purge out the propaganda” on Grokipedia.   

It reportedly crashed temporarily after launch before promptly coming back online. 

At the time of writing, the site is fully functional and claims to host over 885,000 articles so far.

While details are still sparse on the specific processes behind Grokipedia, at first glance, its AI-integrations mark quite a different organizational structure from Wikipedia. 

In Grokipedia’s case, X’s Grok AI appears to take the lead in dictating and moderating content on the platform, while Wikipedia relies on a blend of editorial volunteers and automated tools.

Related: X launches market for inactive handles amid push to monetize digital identity

Musk explained on Monday that users will be able to add or request changes to content on Grokipedia, with the AI making the final decision. 

“Grok generated about 1M articles using a lot of compute. You will be able to ask Grok to add/modify/delete articles and it will either take the action or tell you it won’t and why,” Musk wrote via X.

Musk has criticized Wikipedia on multiple occasions, alleging that it is biased toward the left side of politics and culture. 

Notably, while Musk’s direct criticism is not mentioned in Grokipedia’s article on “Wikipedia,” it does highlight studies suggesting the platform has a left-wing bias.  

“Studies analyzing article language and tone reveal deviations from neutrality, with right-leaning political figures and topics more frequently depicted negatively compared to left-leaning counterparts, suggesting the policies do not fully mitigate ideological skews arising from editor demographics and source selection,” the article reads.

Meanwhile, Wikipedia’s article on Grokipedia cites concerns from the critics that Grokipedia has the potential to be slanted toward “far-right” perspectives of Elon Musk. 

“Critics have highlighted entries that promote far-right perspectives or favor Musk’s viewpoints.[7] NBC News noted that the Grokipedia entry for Musk did not mention the hand gesture he made in January 2025, which many viewed as a Nazi salute, while Wikipedia’s article does,[5]” the Wikipedia article about Grokipedia reads. 

Magazine: Worldcoin’s less ‘dystopian,’ more cypherpunk rival: Billions Network

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-s-grokipedia-goes-online?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Dogelon Mars Logo
Dogelon Mars Price(ELON)
$0.00000004415
$0.00000004415$0.00000004415
+0.29%
USD
Dogelon Mars (ELON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Surprising 2025 Decline In Online Interest Despite Market Turmoil

The Surprising 2025 Decline In Online Interest Despite Market Turmoil

The post The Surprising 2025 Decline In Online Interest Despite Market Turmoil appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin Searches Plunge: The Surprising 2025
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 14:56
Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026-2032: Is ENS a good investment?

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026-2032: Is ENS a good investment?

Key takeaways: The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/18 00:18
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01