TLDRs; EU proposes delaying high-risk AI rules until 2027 while revising data privacy regulations. Personal data definition may narrow, enabling broader AI training under “legitimate interest.” Cookie consent banners could be removed, shifting tracking responsibility to users. Privacy advocates warn EU changes could weaken digital rights protections across the bloc. The European Commission is preparing [...] The post European Commission Proposes Revising AI Rules and Data Privacy Laws appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; EU proposes delaying high-risk AI rules until 2027 while revising data privacy regulations. Personal data definition may narrow, enabling broader AI training under “legitimate interest.” Cookie consent banners could be removed, shifting tracking responsibility to users. Privacy advocates warn EU changes could weaken digital rights protections across the bloc. The European Commission is preparing [...] The post European Commission Proposes Revising AI Rules and Data Privacy Laws appeared first on CoinCentral.

European Commission Proposes Revising AI Rules and Data Privacy Laws

TLDRs;

  • EU proposes delaying high-risk AI rules until 2027 while revising data privacy regulations.
  • Personal data definition may narrow, enabling broader AI training under “legitimate interest.”
  • Cookie consent banners could be removed, shifting tracking responsibility to users.
  • Privacy advocates warn EU changes could weaken digital rights protections across the bloc.

The European Commission is preparing to propose significant changes to its digital regulatory framework, which could reshape how companies in Europe handle artificial intelligence and personal data.

Among the planned reforms is a one-year pause on several high-risk AI rules, potentially delaying their enforcement until 2027. The move comes amid debates over the balance between innovation and user privacy, with lawmakers and stakeholders expressing mixed reactions.

The revisions aim to create a more flexible regulatory environment for AI development. By delaying strict obligations, the EU hopes to give businesses additional time to adapt to new compliance requirements. However, some lawmakers have voiced concerns that postponing these rules could leave gaps in consumer protections during the interim.

Narrowing Personal Data Definition

Another key aspect of the proposed changes involves redefining what qualifies as personal data. The commission plans to narrow the scope, which may allow companies to process more information for AI training without explicit consent.

Under the revised framework, firms could rely on the “legitimate interest” clause in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to justify data usage, as long as their business needs do not override individual rights.

This shift could have broad implications for data tracking and profiling. Certain pseudonymous identifiers, such as cookies or advertising IDs, may no longer be classified as personal data, enabling more extensive analytics while avoiding direct identification of users. While businesses may welcome the flexibility, privacy advocates argue it risks undermining fundamental digital rights.

The European Commission is also considering removing mandatory cookie consent banners, a move that would fundamentally alter online tracking practices. Instead of opting in, users would have the ability to object after data collection begins.

Media companies and advertisers could continue requiring consent for personalized advertising thanks to specific carve-outs in the proposed regulations.

This adjustment signals a potential pivot in privacy-focused technologies. Vendors could develop contextual advertising solutions or next-generation consent tools aligned with the new baseline, reducing reliance on traditional consent management systems. Businesses using automated compliance software may also shift toward documenting legitimate interest processes rather than securing explicit approvals.

Industry and Advocacy Reactions

Privacy groups and over 127 organizations have warned that these proposals may weaken digital protections, especially for high-risk AI applications.

Concerns revolve around increased tracking, profiling, and a potential erosion of user autonomy online. Meanwhile, companies operating in AI, digital marketing, and media have largely welcomed the flexibility, citing reduced operational burdens and clearer frameworks for compliance.

The formal proposal is expected on November 19, with enforcement planned in 2027. Both the European Parliament and member states will need to approve the changes before they take effect, and debates over their scope and impact are likely to continue in the coming months.

The post European Commission Proposes Revising AI Rules and Data Privacy Laws appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.04235
$0.04235$0.04235
+0.85%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF (WIF) price is entering a critical technical phase as price action reclaims the 200-day moving average, a level that often separates bearish control from bullish
Share
Crypto.news2026/01/13 23:44
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Trump: Powell did a bad job.

Trump: Powell did a bad job.

PANews reported on January 13th that, according to Jinshi Data, US President Trump stated: "Federal Reserve Chairman Powell is either incompetent or dishonest.
Share
PANews2026/01/13 23:40