The post How The Kurdish-Led SDF Could Hugely Improve Syria’s New Army appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Members of the Syrian Kurdish Asayish security forces stand guard at the Kurdish-run al-Hol camp, which holds relatives of suspected Islamic State (IS) group fighters in the northeastern Hasakeh governorate, on April 18, 2025, as the Syrian Democratic Forces mount a security campaign against IS “sleeper cells” in the camp. Kurdish-run camps and prisons in northeastern Syria still hold about 56,000 people from dozens of countries, many of them the family members of Islamic State group (IS) suspects, more than five years after the jihadists’ territorial defeat in Syria. (Photo by Delil SOULEIMAN / AFP) (Photo by DELIL SOULEIMAN/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces have combated the Islamic State group, commonly known by its ISIS acronym, in Syria for well over a decade with U.S. backing. Today, almost a year after his militia drove former President Bashar al-Assad into exile, Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa wants this multi-ethnic fighting force to integrate into the country’s new national army. Experts anticipate that a smooth integration, by no means guaranteed by the ongoing negotiations, would greatly benefit the Syrian military, giving it new capabilities, far greater professionalism, and badly needed manpower. The SDF handed over pro-government fighters it had detained during recent clashes early last week and received a delegation from Damascus in the city of Raqqa, the former capital of the self-styled ISIS caliphate. The SDF described the handover as a goodwill gesture following recent skirmishes with pro-government forces, renewing hopes that a peaceful integration remains within reach despite continued delays and recent setbacks. “These are positive gestures by the SDF to show it is serious about fair and meaningful integration,” Mohammed A. Salih, a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told me. “From the perspective of the SDF and Syrian… The post How The Kurdish-Led SDF Could Hugely Improve Syria’s New Army appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Members of the Syrian Kurdish Asayish security forces stand guard at the Kurdish-run al-Hol camp, which holds relatives of suspected Islamic State (IS) group fighters in the northeastern Hasakeh governorate, on April 18, 2025, as the Syrian Democratic Forces mount a security campaign against IS “sleeper cells” in the camp. Kurdish-run camps and prisons in northeastern Syria still hold about 56,000 people from dozens of countries, many of them the family members of Islamic State group (IS) suspects, more than five years after the jihadists’ territorial defeat in Syria. (Photo by Delil SOULEIMAN / AFP) (Photo by DELIL SOULEIMAN/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces have combated the Islamic State group, commonly known by its ISIS acronym, in Syria for well over a decade with U.S. backing. Today, almost a year after his militia drove former President Bashar al-Assad into exile, Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa wants this multi-ethnic fighting force to integrate into the country’s new national army. Experts anticipate that a smooth integration, by no means guaranteed by the ongoing negotiations, would greatly benefit the Syrian military, giving it new capabilities, far greater professionalism, and badly needed manpower. The SDF handed over pro-government fighters it had detained during recent clashes early last week and received a delegation from Damascus in the city of Raqqa, the former capital of the self-styled ISIS caliphate. The SDF described the handover as a goodwill gesture following recent skirmishes with pro-government forces, renewing hopes that a peaceful integration remains within reach despite continued delays and recent setbacks. “These are positive gestures by the SDF to show it is serious about fair and meaningful integration,” Mohammed A. Salih, a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told me. “From the perspective of the SDF and Syrian…

How The Kurdish-Led SDF Could Hugely Improve Syria’s New Army

Members of the Syrian Kurdish Asayish security forces stand guard at the Kurdish-run al-Hol camp, which holds relatives of suspected Islamic State (IS) group fighters in the northeastern Hasakeh governorate, on April 18, 2025, as the Syrian Democratic Forces mount a security campaign against IS “sleeper cells” in the camp. Kurdish-run camps and prisons in northeastern Syria still hold about 56,000 people from dozens of countries, many of them the family members of Islamic State group (IS) suspects, more than five years after the jihadists’ territorial defeat in Syria. (Photo by Delil SOULEIMAN / AFP) (Photo by DELIL SOULEIMAN/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces have combated the Islamic State group, commonly known by its ISIS acronym, in Syria for well over a decade with U.S. backing. Today, almost a year after his militia drove former President Bashar al-Assad into exile, Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa wants this multi-ethnic fighting force to integrate into the country’s new national army. Experts anticipate that a smooth integration, by no means guaranteed by the ongoing negotiations, would greatly benefit the Syrian military, giving it new capabilities, far greater professionalism, and badly needed manpower.

The SDF handed over pro-government fighters it had detained during recent clashes early last week and received a delegation from Damascus in the city of Raqqa, the former capital of the self-styled ISIS caliphate. The SDF described the handover as a goodwill gesture following recent skirmishes with pro-government forces, renewing hopes that a peaceful integration remains within reach despite continued delays and recent setbacks.

“These are positive gestures by the SDF to show it is serious about fair and meaningful integration,” Mohammed A. Salih, a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told me.

“From the perspective of the SDF and Syrian Kurds generally, some of the views about ‘integration’ coming from Damascus and Ankara are closer to ‘surrender,’ which they are determined to resist,” Salih said.

“Sharaa has already allowed other former opposition formations to integrate as whole blocs and should, in the interest of consistency, fairness, and good-faith negotiation, extend the same option to the SDF.”

SDF commander-in-chief Mazloum Abdi met with Sharaa on March 10 and signed a deal pledging to integrate his forces into the military by the end of this year. However, that process has faced repeated delays, with the two sides disagreeing over the fundamental integration process and, more broadly, the future of Syrian governance.

Sharaa insists on a centralized state, while the Kurds advocate a decentralized and secular one that respects Syria’s numerous ethnic and religious minorities. Furthermore, the SDF insists that its troops integrate into the broader Syrian military in three distinct units, while Sharaa has insisted they enlist as individuals.

Wladimir van Wilgenburg, a freelance journalist and analyst specializing in Kurdish affairs and co-author of the authoritative 2021 book Accidental Allies: The U.S.–Syrian Democratic Forces Partnership Against the Islamic State, noted that recent discussions between Damascus and the SDF focused on military integration.

“There have been rumors also that the SDF have been offered positions in the Syrian Defense Ministry,” Wilgenburg told me. “So, it’s possible to integrate the SDF and also the internal security forces, also known as Asayish, into the general security force.”

“But the issue is that Damascus wants to integrate them on the brigade, division, or corps level,” he said. “Although the SDF doesn’t have a traditional military structure, as explained in my book they have a different structure, they have also been moving more towards military formations based on a traditional military structure.”

Wilgenburg believes it is possible to integrate the SDF into the new Syrian army using the group’s existing regional divisions in the northeast and eastern regions the group currently controls, which cover approximately one-third of Syria’s territory.

“Until now, there haven’t been a lot of signs of concessions, but there have been claims of positive talks,” he said. “A sign of that was in Tabqa, where there was a meeting and an exchange.”

“And recently the tensions have been going down. There was a blockade on Kurdish neighborhoods that has since been lifted,” he added. “But it remains to be seen if they’re going to reach the deadline at the end of this year.”

A successful integration could have enormous benefits for Damascus and the rest of Syria.

“It will certainly expand the size of the Syrian armed forces significantly,” Salih said. “But the SDF is not comparable to other units within the current Syrian military-security apparatus. It is disciplined, well-trained, and ethnically as well as religiously diverse in a way not seen elsewhere in Syria.”

In an October 10 address to the SDF’s Anti-Terrorism Units, known by the Kurdish acronym YAT, Abdi suggested this elite counter-terrorism force could operate across the entire country following integration.

“In the new Syria, in addition to the SDF’s integration into the new Syrian army, our anti-terrorism forces will also play a role,” he told them. “Their work will not be limited to northeast Syria, but will be nationwide. They will work alongside other units of the Syrian army.”

To date, the SDF has fought against ISIS in northeast and east Syria. However, ISIS still has cells in the central Homs desert where the SDF hasn’t operated before. It’s conceivable that following any successful integration, these troops could operate in such areas for the first time.

“If the integration process goes well, we might indeed see that,” Salih said. “It has already happened in Iraq, where the Peshmerga and Kurdish anti-terror units conducted joint operations with U.S. and Iraqi forces.”

“The SDF’s YAT units are elite formations in the Syrian context and are capable of carrying out similar missions across Syria — provided there is sufficient political will and proper coordination,” he added.

Another factor potentially complicating the SDF’s integration will be the role played by the all-female Women’s Protection Units, known by their Kurdish acronym YPJ, in the new military. These female fighters became renowned during the ISIS war for bravely combating the jihadists who had infamously enslaved and brutally tortured women and girls from the Yazidi minority in Iraq and Syria.

Senior YPJ commander Rohlat Afrin recently hailed the all-women force and the broader SDF as a model for Syria’s future, insisting that it presents “a democratic and inclusive model on which Syria’s future national army can be built.”

However, integrating the YPJ into Syria’s new army may prove complicated for numerous reasons.

“It’s difficult to integrate the YPJ into the new Syrian army, because it doesn’t have female units,” Wilgenburg said. “And the YPJ is like a feminist force, although it’s not very big. It could be possible if the YPJ just stays in the areas controlled by Kurds.”

“And while they do also already operate in non-Kurdish areas, in general, it would be difficult to integrate the YPJ and the Syrian National Army,” he added. “But if they keep their own semi-autonomous structure, maybe it will be easier.”

Salih also sees the YPJ’s integration as a “sticky and difficult question,” noting there are “ideological and cultural barriers” that make that group particularly distinct.

“Kurdish politics in Syria is progressive in a way that has no real equivalent elsewhere in Syria or much of the broader region when it comes to women’s roles in public life, including in the armed forces,” he said.

“So, I expect the clash between these two visions of women’s rights and place in society to continue playing out in Syria — whether regarding the YPJ or broader women-related issues.”

More broadly, Wilgenburg noted that President Sharaa has not made many concessions as he has political support from the United States, which wants his government to consolidate its authority across all of Syria. He has recently cracked down on foreign jihadist fighters, with recent clashes breaking out in the northwestern Idlib province, where Sharaa previously led the armed Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham during the civil war against Assad.

Wilgenburg also pointed to the ongoing peace process in Turkey, which could finally end the decades-long war between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party group, more commonly known by its Kurdish PKK acronym. Turkey is “following closely and with greater sensitivity” the SDF integration talks, Turkish state-run media reported on Thursday. Ankara has long charged that the main Kurdish component of that multi-ethnic fighting force, the People’s Protection Units or YPG, is inextricably tied to the PKK and launched several cross-border incursions against it during the Syrian Civil War. However, it would likely want to avoid another war against the SDF and its components for now while there is a historical opportunity to finally end the conflict with the PKK once and for all.

Furthermore, Wilgenburg pointed out that the U.S. and France also do not want to see any war between the Syrian army and the SDF, especially following the sectarian massacres perpetrated by pro-government militias against the Alawite and Druze minorities earlier this year.

“So, there might be some concessions, but I think not having everything under centralized control is a big red line for Sharaa,” he said.

“It’s still going to be a difficult discussion, and I’m not really sure if they’re going to reach the deadline of the end of the year because it’s very difficult.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/pauliddon/2025/10/26/how-the-kurdish-led-sdf-could-hugely-improve-syrias-new-army/

Market Opportunity
ARMY Logo
ARMY Price(ARMY)
$0,0081
$0,0081$0,0081
-0,12%
USD
ARMY (ARMY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50