The post JPMorgan, BNY Accused Of Supporting Epstein’s Sex Trafficking Operations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Bank of America and Bank of New York “chose profit” over protecting victims of Jeffrey Epstein despite having information on the late convicted sex offender’s sex trafficking operation, two new lawsuits alleged Wednesday, the latest moves made against major banks regarding Epstein’s crimes and what role financial institutions may have played in facilitating or neglecting them. The lawsuits were filed Wednesday. (Photo by MARK RALSTON / AFP) (Photo by MARK RALSTON/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Key Facts The class action lawsuits filed by a Jane Doe accuse Bank of America and BNY of participating in and financially benefiting from Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Doe, who claimed she lived in Russia when she met Epstein in 2011, also alleged opening up a Bank of America account in 2013 under her name at the direction of Epstein’s accountant. Other bank accounts were opened under Doe’s name and used by Epstein and the accountant, the lawsuit against Bank of America alleges, claiming one account was used as late as 2019, past Epstein’s death in August that year. The lawsuit claims Bank of America and BNY “knowingly” provided financial support for Epstein and his co-conspirators “under the guise of non-criminal business activities,” accusing the bank of failing “to alert law enforcement as to Epstein’s crimes before it was far too late.” BNY, which declined to comment, is accused of processing $378 million in payments to Epstein’s sex trafficking victims. Bank of America had no immediate comment. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Why Are Epstein Accusers Targeting Banks? With Epstein’s death in 2019 and Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell serving a 20-year prison sentence, banks have… The post JPMorgan, BNY Accused Of Supporting Epstein’s Sex Trafficking Operations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Bank of America and Bank of New York “chose profit” over protecting victims of Jeffrey Epstein despite having information on the late convicted sex offender’s sex trafficking operation, two new lawsuits alleged Wednesday, the latest moves made against major banks regarding Epstein’s crimes and what role financial institutions may have played in facilitating or neglecting them. The lawsuits were filed Wednesday. (Photo by MARK RALSTON / AFP) (Photo by MARK RALSTON/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Key Facts The class action lawsuits filed by a Jane Doe accuse Bank of America and BNY of participating in and financially benefiting from Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Doe, who claimed she lived in Russia when she met Epstein in 2011, also alleged opening up a Bank of America account in 2013 under her name at the direction of Epstein’s accountant. Other bank accounts were opened under Doe’s name and used by Epstein and the accountant, the lawsuit against Bank of America alleges, claiming one account was used as late as 2019, past Epstein’s death in August that year. The lawsuit claims Bank of America and BNY “knowingly” provided financial support for Epstein and his co-conspirators “under the guise of non-criminal business activities,” accusing the bank of failing “to alert law enforcement as to Epstein’s crimes before it was far too late.” BNY, which declined to comment, is accused of processing $378 million in payments to Epstein’s sex trafficking victims. Bank of America had no immediate comment. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Why Are Epstein Accusers Targeting Banks? With Epstein’s death in 2019 and Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell serving a 20-year prison sentence, banks have…

JPMorgan, BNY Accused Of Supporting Epstein’s Sex Trafficking Operations

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Topline

Bank of America and Bank of New York “chose profit” over protecting victims of Jeffrey Epstein despite having information on the late convicted sex offender’s sex trafficking operation, two new lawsuits alleged Wednesday, the latest moves made against major banks regarding Epstein’s crimes and what role financial institutions may have played in facilitating or neglecting them.

The lawsuits were filed Wednesday. (Photo by MARK RALSTON / AFP) (Photo by MARK RALSTON/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Key Facts

The class action lawsuits filed by a Jane Doe accuse Bank of America and BNY of participating in and financially benefiting from Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.

Doe, who claimed she lived in Russia when she met Epstein in 2011, also alleged opening up a Bank of America account in 2013 under her name at the direction of Epstein’s accountant.

Other bank accounts were opened under Doe’s name and used by Epstein and the accountant, the lawsuit against Bank of America alleges, claiming one account was used as late as 2019, past Epstein’s death in August that year.

The lawsuit claims Bank of America and BNY “knowingly” provided financial support for Epstein and his co-conspirators “under the guise of non-criminal business activities,” accusing the bank of failing “to alert law enforcement as to Epstein’s crimes before it was far too late.”

BNY, which declined to comment, is accused of processing $378 million in payments to Epstein’s sex trafficking victims.

Bank of America had no immediate comment.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Why Are Epstein Accusers Targeting Banks?

With Epstein’s death in 2019 and Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell serving a 20-year prison sentence, banks have become a target of Epstein accusers and victims. The late sex offender’s trafficking operation required extensive financial planning to fund its size and disguise its transactions as legitimate. The latest accusers are likely empowered by settlements JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank reached in 2023 with other alleged victims. JPMorgan settled for $290 million and the latter settled for $75 million over allegations they facilitated Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Neither bank admitted to wrongdoing.

Tangent

The lawsuits come about a month after House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked an effort from Democrats to subpoena JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince as part of an investigation into reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. Dimon attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, telling reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.”

Key Background

Bank of America filed suspicious activity reports in 2020 about $170 million in Epstein-linked transactions, provoking concern from lawmakers that the bank could have violated money laundering laws and processed payments without understanding the nature of the transactions, The New York Times reported, noting it is not uncommon for banks to file suspicious activity reports long after the transactions.

Further Reading

House Judiciary Republicans Reject Vote To Subpoena Major Banks In Epstein Case (Forbes)

Bank of America Sued Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties (WSJ)

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/10/15/why-epstein-victims-are-going-after-banks-jpmorgan-bny-both-sued/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0,03762
$0,03762$0,03762
-%1,18
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Moves Above $1.40 as Traders Watch Bullish Signals

XRP Moves Above $1.40 as Traders Watch Bullish Signals

The post XRP Moves Above $1.40 as Traders Watch Bullish Signals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP climbed above $1.40 with $3.5B volume as traders highlight
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 18:54
Paramount-WBD 2027 movie slate could dominate. Can it sustain?

Paramount-WBD 2027 movie slate could dominate. Can it sustain?

The post Paramount-WBD 2027 movie slate could dominate. Can it sustain? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison speaks during
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 19:06
How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

Author: Heechang Compiled by: TechFlow xStocks offers a tokenized stock service, allowing investors to trade tokenized versions of popular US stocks like Tesla in real time. While still in its early stages, it’s already showing some interesting signs of growth. Observation 1: Trading is concentrated in Tesla (TSLA) As in many emerging markets, trading activity has quickly concentrated on a handful of stocks. Data shows a high concentration of trading volume in the most well-known and volatile stocks, with Tesla being the most prominent example. This concentration is not surprising: liquidity tends to accumulate in assets that retail investors already favor, and early adopters often use familiar high-beta stocks to test new infrastructure. Observation 2: Liquidity decreases on weekends Data shows that on-chain equity trading volume drops to 30% or less of weekday levels over the weekend. Unlike crypto-native assets, which trade seamlessly around the clock, tokenized stocks still inherit the behavioral inertia of traditional market trading hours. Traders appear less willing to trade when reference markets (such as Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange) are closed, likely due to concerns about arbitrage, price gaps, and the inability to hedge positions off-chain. Observation 3: Prices move in line with the Nasdaq Another key signal comes from pricing behavior during the initial launch period. Initially, xStocks tokens traded at a significant premium to their Nasdaq counterparts, reflecting market enthusiasm and potential friction in bridging fiat liquidity. However, these premiums gradually diminished over time. Current trading patterns show that the token price is at the upper limit of Tesla's intraday price range and is highly consistent with the Nasdaq reference price. Arbitrageurs appear to be maintaining this price discipline, but there are still small deviations from the intraday highs, indicating some market inefficiencies that may present opportunities and risks for active traders. New opportunities for Korean stock investors? South Korean investors currently hold over $100 billion in US stocks, with trading volume increasing 17-fold since January 2020. Existing infrastructure for South Korean investors to trade US stocks is limited by high fees, long settlement times, and slow cash-out processes, creating opportunities for tokenized or on-chain mirror stocks. As the infrastructure and platforms supporting on-chain US stock markets continue to improve, a new group of South Korean traders will enter the crypto market, which is undoubtedly a huge opportunity.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 08:00