The post Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.    That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored.  The “prudent” solution  Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).   You Might Also Like Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet. Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure. Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-termThe post Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.    That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored.  The “prudent” solution  Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).   You Might Also Like Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet. Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure. Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-term

Ledger CTO: Quantum Computer Unlikely to Break Bitcoin In Near Term

2025/11/14 06:00

Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at hardware wallet giant Ledger, has opined that a quantum computer is unlikely to break Bitcoin’s current cryptography.   

That said, Guillemet believes such a black swan event is not impossible, and the quantum threat should not be ignored. 

The “prudent” solution 

Guillemet has argued in favor of proactively upgrading the current Bitcoin protocol in order to make sure that it remains quantum-resistant. This would require defining a “migration path,” which would include those coins that are presumed to be lost (such as Satoshi Nakamoto’s enormous 1.1 million stash).  

You Might Also Like

Guillemet has warned that such migration would come with trade-offs. The Ledger CTO has warned that lattice-based cryptography, which is considered to be the leading candidate for quantum-resistant encryption, is still relatively new and unproven. “Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography hasn’t yet stood the test of time, and hash-based schemes feel archaic,” said Guillemet.

Moreover, he has noted that quantum-resistant schemes might not work properly with the existing BIP32 structure.

Source: https://u.today/ledger-cto-quantum-computer-unlikely-to-break-bitcoin-in-near-term

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

the $63M White Whale of a tale

the $63M White Whale of a tale

The post the $63M White Whale of a tale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This weekend on crypto social media, memecoin traders spun yet another fantastic tale of leveraged trading meltdown.  According to the still-being-written legend, crypto exchange MEXC locked $3 million belonging to famed crypto trader The White Whale. As he continued to amass money from leveraged trading despite the freeze, he claimed that he’d become so wealthy that if MEXC ever unfroze the funds, he’d give away the proceeds to the community.  Then, on October 10, HyperLiquid liquidated $63 million of his then-larger assets amid a contentious pricing print from a data oracle. Though briefly devastated, MEXC eventually agreed to unlock his assets, prompting celebrations over his legendary return and, predictably, the creation of various memecoins. Smelling an opportunity, The White Whale decided to use some of his recently unlocked $3 million, earmarked for “the community,” to overtake one of these eponymous memecoins and add liquidity on its trading pairs. The White Whale of crypto Most crypto traders simply laughed as he attached cringe-worthy images of a white whale engaged in financial transactions to his trading commentary tweets. The laughter was appropriate, given how impossible it is to verify his narrative. So-called decentralized exchanges with limited know your customer requirements like HyperLiquid allow anyone to create an unlimited number of wallets and manipulate the pricing of markets across various wallets that they control.  In other words, no one except the trader knows if someone has sole claim to a single wallet and username, or whether someone is using multiple wallets in order to craft a trading history for one of many usernames. The White Whale, like the titular whale in Herman Melville’s 1851 novel, Moby Dick, has become an obsession to many on social media, thanks to the fantastic sums of money at stake, the clownish images, and the ostensibly philanthropic, Phoneix…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 21:19