TLDR: A runaway trading bot triggered an abnormal HYPE price spike on Lighter, later removed from the exchange’s chart interface. Lighter said the on-chain data remained intact and public despite the chart correction for “scaling purposes.” Critics, including analyst Duo Nine, accused the platform of hiding illiquidity and misleading its users. The event reignited debate [...] The post Market Expert Accuses Lighter of Censoring HYPE Data After Flash Spike appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR: A runaway trading bot triggered an abnormal HYPE price spike on Lighter, later removed from the exchange’s chart interface. Lighter said the on-chain data remained intact and public despite the chart correction for “scaling purposes.” Critics, including analyst Duo Nine, accused the platform of hiding illiquidity and misleading its users. The event reignited debate [...] The post Market Expert Accuses Lighter of Censoring HYPE Data After Flash Spike appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Expert Accuses Lighter of Censoring HYPE Data After Flash Spike

TLDR:

  • A runaway trading bot triggered an abnormal HYPE price spike on Lighter, later removed from the exchange’s chart interface.
  • Lighter said the on-chain data remained intact and public despite the chart correction for “scaling purposes.”
  • Critics, including analyst Duo Nine, accused the platform of hiding illiquidity and misleading its users.
  • The event reignited debate over transparency and data presentation on decentralized trading front ends.

A sharp price anomaly in the HYPE market has stirred a debate over transparency on decentralized trading platforms. 

Lighter, a decentralized perpetuals exchange, said a runaway bot caused an abnormal price spike during low-volume trading. The glitch briefly inflated HYPE prices before the platform removed the distorted data from its chart interface. 

On-chain records remain visible, though traders argue that deleting visuals undermines openness. The event quickly drew attention from crypto market analysts and users across social media.

Lighter Explains the HYPE Price Glitch

According to WuBlockchain, the issue began when an automated trading bot placed oversized orders into the thin HYPE market. 

Lighter confirmed the problem in a statement, calling it an isolated event that did not cause any liquidations or broader effects. The platform said only small trades were executed at high prices, creating a misleading wick on the chart.

To prevent what it described as “scaling issues,” Lighter scrubbed the extreme price movement from its front-end display. The exchange maintained that it did not alter blockchain records, stressing that all raw data remains public through block explorers. 

Lighter said it removed the spike purely for usability, arguing that leaving it would distort price charts for traders.

The team reiterated that decentralized platforms hosting their own interfaces can decide how to visualize market data. They added that other front ends connected to the same protocol could choose to keep the wick visible. This explanation, however, did not convince everyone.

Traders Question Data Transparency in Crypto Markets

Market analyst Duo Nine (YCC) publicly criticized Lighter’s decision, claiming it masked liquidity weaknesses in the HYPE order book. 

In his post, he accused the platform of hiding price distortions instead of acknowledging illiquid conditions. His comments suggested that removing data from user charts could mislead traders about real market behavior.

He warned that this type of editing risks eroding trust if similar situations occur during periods of higher leverage or open positions. According to Duo Nine, platforms promoting decentralization should avoid altering user-facing market visuals.

The debate has since spread across crypto circles, raising fresh questions about front-end control in decentralized systems. Some traders sympathized with Lighter’s explanation, saying the fix avoided confusion for new users. 

Others viewed it as a censorship issue, arguing that data, accurate or not, should remain visible.

While the HYPE incident did not result in financial damage, it reignited broader concerns about chart integrity in decentralized finance. The situation highlights how quickly technical issues can evolve into transparency controversies within crypto trading environments.

The post Market Expert Accuses Lighter of Censoring HYPE Data After Flash Spike appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Hyperliquid Logo
Hyperliquid Price(HYPE)
$25.01
$25.01$25.01
-0.63%
USD
Hyperliquid (HYPE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026

Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026

The post Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko predicts stablecoin
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/29 02:32
Tokenization and AI: The emergence of orbital cloud infrastructure | Opinion

Tokenization and AI: The emergence of orbital cloud infrastructure | Opinion

Evaluating key energy requirements to support the growth in AI-driven tokenization necessitating orbital cloud data centers.
Share
Crypto.news2025/12/29 02:04