The post Quantum Computing Is Not a Threat to Bitcoin, Says Adam Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin Claims that quantum computers are close to threatening Bitcoin resurfaced again this week, but one of the earliest figures in the cypherpunk movement insists the discussion is detached from real-world engineering progress. Whenever the market turns volatile, conversations about “Q-Day” — the hypothetical moment quantum computing breaks Bitcoin — tend to reappear. The latest round followed the recent price drop, prompting social media speculation that Bitcoin’s cryptography could soon be compromised. Adam Back, one of the longest-active developers in the space, dismissed the idea that quantum computing poses a near-term risk. He said the technology is nowhere near capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations and won’t be for at least 20 years, possibly 40. Back noted that the security conversation isn’t theoretical. Post-quantum signature schemes already exist today, and the Bitcoin network would have multiple upgrade cycles before any quantum-capable hardware could pose a realistic threat. In other words, the industry would not be forced into a last-minute transition. Back also acknowledged that the quantum debate often coincides with price uncertainty. He suggested that exaggerated risk narratives can be used to unsettle investors during downturns — reducing liquidity and making it easier for opportunistic buyers to accumulate coins. According to Back, Bitcoin is not racing against an urgent clock. The network has both time and upgrade paths available, and quantum computing — in its current and foreseeable state — has no actionable impact on Bitcoin security. The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Author Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things.… The post Quantum Computing Is Not a Threat to Bitcoin, Says Adam Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin Claims that quantum computers are close to threatening Bitcoin resurfaced again this week, but one of the earliest figures in the cypherpunk movement insists the discussion is detached from real-world engineering progress. Whenever the market turns volatile, conversations about “Q-Day” — the hypothetical moment quantum computing breaks Bitcoin — tend to reappear. The latest round followed the recent price drop, prompting social media speculation that Bitcoin’s cryptography could soon be compromised. Adam Back, one of the longest-active developers in the space, dismissed the idea that quantum computing poses a near-term risk. He said the technology is nowhere near capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations and won’t be for at least 20 years, possibly 40. Back noted that the security conversation isn’t theoretical. Post-quantum signature schemes already exist today, and the Bitcoin network would have multiple upgrade cycles before any quantum-capable hardware could pose a realistic threat. In other words, the industry would not be forced into a last-minute transition. Back also acknowledged that the quantum debate often coincides with price uncertainty. He suggested that exaggerated risk narratives can be used to unsettle investors during downturns — reducing liquidity and making it easier for opportunistic buyers to accumulate coins. According to Back, Bitcoin is not racing against an urgent clock. The network has both time and upgrade paths available, and quantum computing — in its current and foreseeable state — has no actionable impact on Bitcoin security. The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Author Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things.…

Quantum Computing Is Not a Threat to Bitcoin, Says Adam Back

2025/11/17 09:23
Bitcoin

Claims that quantum computers are close to threatening Bitcoin resurfaced again this week, but one of the earliest figures in the cypherpunk movement insists the discussion is detached from real-world engineering progress.

Whenever the market turns volatile, conversations about “Q-Day” — the hypothetical moment quantum computing breaks Bitcoin — tend to reappear. The latest round followed the recent price drop, prompting social media speculation that Bitcoin’s cryptography could soon be compromised.

Adam Back, one of the longest-active developers in the space, dismissed the idea that quantum computing poses a near-term risk. He said the technology is nowhere near capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations and won’t be for at least 20 years, possibly 40.

Back noted that the security conversation isn’t theoretical. Post-quantum signature schemes already exist today, and the Bitcoin network would have multiple upgrade cycles before any quantum-capable hardware could pose a realistic threat. In other words, the industry would not be forced into a last-minute transition.

Back also acknowledged that the quantum debate often coincides with price uncertainty. He suggested that exaggerated risk narratives can be used to unsettle investors during downturns — reducing liquidity and making it easier for opportunistic buyers to accumulate coins.

According to Back, Bitcoin is not racing against an urgent clock. The network has both time and upgrade paths available, and quantum computing — in its current and foreseeable state — has no actionable impact on Bitcoin security.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new trends in the world of digital currencies. Whether providing in-depth analysis or daily reports on all topics, his deep understanding and enthusiasm for what he does make him a valuable member of the team.

Related stories

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/quantum-computing-is-not-a-threat-to-bitcoin-says-adam-back/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Iranian financial facilitators for coordinating over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency in oil sales for the Iranian government, a September 16 press release shows. OFAC Sanctions Iranian Nationals According to the Tuesday press release, Iranian nationals Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand “used a network of front companies in multiple foreign jurisdictions” to transfer the digital assets. OFAC alleges that Alivand and Derakhshan’s transfers also involved the sale of Iranian oil that benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). IRGC-QF and MODAFL then used the proceeds to support regional proxy terrorist organizations and strengthen their advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles. U.S. officials say the move targets shadow banking in the region, where illicit financial actors use overseas money laundering and digital assets to evade sanctions. “Iranian entities rely on shadow banking networks to evade sanctions and move millions through the international financial system,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt these key financial streams that fund Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities in the Middle East and beyond,” he continued. Dozens Designated In Shadow Banking Scandal Both Alivand and Derakhshan have been designated “for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the IRGC-QF.” In addition to Alivand and Derakhshan, OFAC has sanctioned more than a dozen Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates-based entities and individuals tied to the network. According to the press release, the sanctioned entities may face civil or criminal penalties imposed as a result
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 11:18