"The Wolf of All Streets" challenged XRP’s relevance as major firms like SWIFT and Western Union favor other payment rails."The Wolf of All Streets" challenged XRP’s relevance as major firms like SWIFT and Western Union favor other payment rails.

Ripple Clash: Scott Melker Questions XRP’s True Purpose

A simple question from a well-known crypto commentator has sparked a heated debate online about the fundamental purpose of the XRP token.

Scott Melker, who goes by “The Wolf Of All Streets” on X, took to the social platform to ask about the current use case for XRP, distinguishing it from its associated company, Ripple.

The question drew hundreds of responses, revealing a deep divide between the token’s technical promise and its real-world adoption.

The Core of the Disagreement

Melker’s initial post, which he made sure to point out was not an attempt at trolling, questioned XRP’s role in a world where major financial firms like Western Union and SWIFT are choosing other blockchains for payments. “Stablecoins have clearly taken the reins for payments,” he noted, asking what specific utility XRP now holds.

Reaction from parts of the XRP community was quick and, at times, defensive. Some accused the podcast host of ignorance, while others suggested he was not conducting proper research.

This prompted a pointed observation from Melker:

However, some offered more detailed explanations, describing XRP as the foundational asset for the XRP Ledger (XRPL). One of the cryptocurrency’s advocates, ‘Mickle,’ argued that its value is intrinsic to the network’s operation, calling it a “neutral bridge currency” for settling payments between different financial systems, like central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and banks.

Another user added that while stablecoins represent value, “XRP represents mobility,” acting as an impartial intermediary that doesn’t rely on a specific issuer like a bank.

However, Melker repeatedly pressed for evidence of this technology being used widely today. “Is anyone using it right now? Or is it theoretical?” he asked. And when challenged to do his own research, the author of “The Wolf Den Newsletter” responded, “Nobody can answer what is happening. They all just tell me what will.”

A Technical Explanation and an Honest Admission

Amid the noise, an explanation from Onami Press co-founder Santiago Velez stood out for Melker, with the “Crypto Town Hall” convener calling it “far and away the best response” he had received.

Velez pointed out that one of the core functions of XRP is to have value for spam prevention on the XRP Ledger. He also detailed the “rippling” process, a method for exchanging currencies where XRP acts as a unique, independent bridge.

Because the token is not an IOU like a stablecoin, it carries market volatility risk but not the counterparty risk of an asset issued by a company like Circle or Tether. This neutrality, Velez argued, is crucial for moving value between systems that cannot trust each other directly.

After considering this, Melker acknowledged the XRP Ledger’s “elegant” design but expressed doubt about its connection to long-term token value. “The bridge clearly works – I’m just not sure the toll booth ever collects,” he concluded, questioning if the technology translates into sustained demand for XRP itself.

In another revealing moment, Mickle conceded a common investment motive, stating, “I mean, this is fair. But at the end of the day, I’m here to make money.”

This community sentiment matches optimistic price predictions circulating in the market. Some analysts believe XRP could still climb above $5 in the current market cycle, based on historical patterns, despite recent price drops and some warning signs. And for many of its holders, the belief in this future price appreciation appears to be as powerful as any current utility.

The post Ripple Clash: Scott Melker Questions XRP’s True Purpose appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Clash Logo
Clash Price(CLASH)
$0.037996
$0.037996$0.037996
+3.06%
USD
Clash (CLASH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF (WIF) price is entering a critical technical phase as price action reclaims the 200-day moving average, a level that often separates bearish control from bullish
Share
Crypto.news2026/01/13 23:44
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Trump: Powell did a bad job.

Trump: Powell did a bad job.

PANews reported on January 13th that, according to Jinshi Data, US President Trump stated: "Federal Reserve Chairman Powell is either incompetent or dishonest.
Share
PANews2026/01/13 23:40