U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed today that the proposed $2,000 tariff checks on Americans would need congressional approval. President Donald Trump proposed the tariff checks, intended for working families, but estimates suggest that the program could cost the country up to $600 billion. Bessent spoke on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures, emphasizing that the […]U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed today that the proposed $2,000 tariff checks on Americans would need congressional approval. President Donald Trump proposed the tariff checks, intended for working families, but estimates suggest that the program could cost the country up to $600 billion. Bessent spoke on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures, emphasizing that the […]

Treasury Secretary concedes Congress would need to green light Trump's $2,000 tariff checks

2025/11/17 19:54
4 min read

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed today that the proposed $2,000 tariff checks on Americans would need congressional approval. President Donald Trump proposed the tariff checks, intended for working families, but estimates suggest that the program could cost the country up to $600 billion.

Bessent spoke on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures, emphasizing that the Trump administration has no unilateral authority to authorize large-scale direct payouts. He stressed that the administration would require approval from Congress.

According to Bessent, the payments are intended for working families and would include income limits as part of the administration’s broader economic solutions. 

Bessent says Americans earning over $100K won’t receive a dime

The tariff dividend payments idea was first brought to light in August by the current President Donald Trump. He noted that billions of dollars in tariff revenue would fund the redistribution of funds directly to Americans.

Based on his Truth Social post, Trump said that the dividend of at least $2,000 per person, excluding high-income families, would be paid to most Americans. He added that the leftovers would be used to reduce the national debt.

Trump described the payments as a way to return tariff proceeds to the public while fulfilling the goals of reducing the national debt. 

Scott Bessent suggested that the payments may not come as checks, but could take the form of tariff-funded tax relief. This could come as no taxes on tips, overtime, or Social Security. He emphasized that no formal plan had yet been finalized. Bessent further noted that any payments would be targeted to working families with income limits to exclude higher earners. 

For instance, the COVID-19 era stimulus targeted individuals making up to $75,000 and married couples not exceeding $150,000 a year. The Treasury Secretary reiterated that everything is on the table in terms of policy options that aim to support working families.

According to a recent Cryptopolitan report, Bessent also noted that Americans earning over $100,000 a year may not receive a dime from the proposed $2,000 paychecks. 

This is not the first time Trump has advocated for such an initiative. During the COVID-19 era, the President proposed $2,000 pandemic relief payments in late 2020. The initiative was enacted in part by President Joe Biden under the American Rescue Plan.

Based on U.S.  Treasury data, approximately 476 million payments were made as stimulus over three rounds totaling $814 billion towards U.S. households. 

Paul Kruger says Trump’s initiative is deeply irresponsible

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman described the latest initiative by President Trump to offer $2,000 paychecks as deeply irresponsible. He warns that repeating large-scale cash injections could trigger inflation. He also criticized the plan, citing the federal deficit, which is approaching $2 trillion.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which is a non-partisan watchdog group, estimated that the $2,000 tariff checks may cost the U.S. roughly $600 billion if modeled like the COVID-19 stimulus packages.

The cost goes up nearly twice the projected tariff revenue for 2025, which economists estimate at $300 billion. As of September, only $195 billion had been collected. The Committee argued that tariff revenue alone would not cover the cost of the proposed payouts.

Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB.org)

In addition to the short revenue collection, some tariffs under the revenue estimates were placed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and have been subject to review by the Supreme Court.  According to customs law experts, if the court invalidates the tariffs, the available funds under the projected $300 billion revenue could be reduced and temporarily increase borrowing needs and further complicate fiscal planning. 

Despite the backlash from several officials, Trump and his administration framed the plan as a solution to rising costs of living. So far, the proposal has not made any official development; it’s still under the fate of congressional action and legal outcomes regarding tariffs.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Bitlight Labs Logo
Bitlight Labs Price(LIGHT)
$0,2424
$0,2424$0,2424
-1,58%
USD
Bitlight Labs (LIGHT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37