TLDRs; The US may restrict exports of Chinese goods made with US software ahead of Trump-Xi summit. Potential measures target tech, aerospace, and manufacturing sectors using US-origin technology. The administration is exploring coordination with G7 allies on export controls to China. Compliance software providers may see rising demand from manufacturers tracking US software use. The [...] The post US Considers Curbs on China-Made Goods Using US Software appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; The US may restrict exports of Chinese goods made with US software ahead of Trump-Xi summit. Potential measures target tech, aerospace, and manufacturing sectors using US-origin technology. The administration is exploring coordination with G7 allies on export controls to China. Compliance software providers may see rising demand from manufacturers tracking US software use. The [...] The post US Considers Curbs on China-Made Goods Using US Software appeared first on CoinCentral.

US Considers Curbs on China-Made Goods Using US Software

2025/10/23 22:31
3 min read

TLDRs;

  • The US may restrict exports of Chinese goods made with US software ahead of Trump-Xi summit.
  • Potential measures target tech, aerospace, and manufacturing sectors using US-origin technology.
  • The administration is exploring coordination with G7 allies on export controls to China.
  • Compliance software providers may see rising demand from manufacturers tracking US software use.

The Trump administration is reportedly evaluating new restrictions on exports to China involving goods that contain, or are manufactured using, US software.

Sources familiar with the discussions, including a US official and three individuals briefed on the matter, have indicated that the proposed measures could cover a wide range of products, from consumer electronics like laptops to complex aerospace components such as jet engines.

This move comes in response to China’s recent tightening of export controls on rare earth elements, materials critical to modern technology manufacturing. The potential curbs would allow Washington to assert leverage in ongoing economic and technological negotiations with Beijing.

Coordination with Allies Likely

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized that all options remain on the table, noting that any new export controls would probably involve coordination with G7 partners.

While the administration could announce these measures as a form of strategic pressure on China, implementation is not guaranteed.

The timing of the potential announcement appears to be linked to an upcoming meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea later this month. Experts suggest that the measures could serve as both a negotiating tool and a signal of US commitment to protecting domestic technological interests.

How Enforcement Could Work

US policymakers could enforce the new restrictions using Foreign Direct Product (FDP) rules outlined in 15 CFR 734.9, which grant the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) authority over foreign-made items that are direct products of US technology or software.

A “direct product” includes items produced through engineering, manufacturing, assembly, inspection, testing, or quality assurance involving US-origin technology.

The BIS has previously applied this framework to Russia and Belarus after the 2022 Ukraine invasion. Items not specifically listed on the Commerce Control List (classified as EAR99) but produced with US technology are subject to these regulations, potentially covering a broad range of Chinese-manufactured goods.

Implications for Manufacturers and Software Vendors

Non-US manufacturers exporting to China would need to track the use of US software in their production processes.

De minimis thresholds, such as 25% for most destinations, require firms to monitor and report the proportion of US-origin technology embedded in their products. Companies may also need to submit one-time filings detailing content percentages and fair market value.

The possible restrictions could spark demand for export compliance software, supply chain mapping tools, and automated BIS reporting solutions. Vendors that offer systems to track software dependencies, calculate de minimis shares, and ensure regulatory compliance may become essential partners for multinational corporations navigating this complex environment.

Strategic and Economic Significance

While the US considers these measures, the broader economic and diplomatic ramifications remain uncertain. Restricting exports of goods made with US software could impact both US and Chinese manufacturers, creating new compliance burdens and influencing supply chain strategies.

Observers note that the move is likely as much about signaling strength in trade negotiations as it is about practical enforcement.

As Washington evaluates its next steps, businesses and policymakers alike will be watching closely to determine how such controls, if implemented, could reshape the flow of technology and goods between the world’s two largest economies.

The post US Considers Curbs on China-Made Goods Using US Software appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.527
$3.527$3.527
-1.14%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37