The post Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation. Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene. Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control? Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage. Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized. The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds. How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked? The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds. Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized. Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds. On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets. Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X Investigators also noted that some of the gas… The post Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation. Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene. Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control? Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage. Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized. The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds. How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked? The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds. Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized. Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds. On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets. Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X Investigators also noted that some of the gas…

Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Key Insights:

  • Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation.
  • Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene.
  • Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control?

Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage.

Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized.

The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds.

How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked?

The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds.

Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized.

Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X

That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds.

On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets.

Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X

Investigators also noted that some of the gas fees came from Monero (XMR) exchanges, a method often linked to North Korean hacking groups. That background made the attack even more concerning.

The method worked this time. But it also showed that Venus can step in directly, which many say goes against the full idea of decentralization.

Venus Protocol Services Back Online, but Not Everyone Is Happy

Venus Protocol said all actions, like withdrawals, repayments, and liquidations, are now working again. The team explained they had to pause yesterday to stop the hacker from taking more.

The quick recovery made some users happy. But others raised concerns. Many on social media asked, “If Venus can pause and take over positions, is it truly decentralized?” Others joked about “forced liquidation,” showing how much control the platform holds.

Community Connects The Measure To Centralization | Source: X

This split shows the core issue. DeFi is built on the idea that code rules everything. But real-world hacks force teams to act, and those actions often look more centralized than people expect.

What It Means for DeFi Going Forward?

The stolen funds from Venus Protocol are back, and the whale is safe. Still, the incident shows bigger lessons.

First, even strong setups like hardware wallets are not always safe. If the linked browser extension or computer is tricked, the wallet can still be misused.

Second, recovery by force liquidation highlights both power and weakness. It saved funds this time. But it also showed that protocols can override positions when needed. That makes people question if these systems are as hands-off as promised.

Finally, this case sets an example for other platforms. Do they pause and act to protect users? Or do they stay hands-off and let losses happen? Venus Protocol chose to act.

The stolen funds may be back, but the question about how much control DeFi teams hold is not going away.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/09/03/venus-protocol-recovers-stolen-funds-but-raises-another-risk/

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01159
$0.01159$0.01159
0.00%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Top 3 Altcoins for the Next Bull Run Ethereum, Solana and Mutuum Finance

Top 3 Altcoins for the Next Bull Run Ethereum, Solana and Mutuum Finance

Ethereum and Solana already sit near the top of most serious altcoin watchlists, and Mutuum Finance is starting to enter that same conversation from a very different
Share
Techbullion2026/03/20 23:07
Trump: We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no negotiating partner.

Trump: We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no negotiating partner.

PANews reported on March 20 that US President Trump stated: "We want to negotiate with Iran, but we have no one to negotiate with. Nobody wants to be Iran's leader
Share
PANews2026/03/20 23:04