QQQ and SPY are two of the most widely followed U.S. ETFs, but they track different indexes.
Invesco QQQ
→ tracks the Nasdaq-100
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
→ tracks the S&P 500
The differences affect:
As of 2026:
| Feature | QQQ | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Index | Nasdaq-100 | S&P 500 |
| Index scope | 100 largest eligible Nasdaq non-financial companies | 500 leading U.S. companies |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.0945% |
| Technology concentration | Higher | Lower |
| Financial companies | Generally excluded by NDX eligibility | Included |
| Number of sectors | Multiple non-financial sectors | All 11 GICS sectors |
QQQ's 0.18% fee is published by Invesco, while State Street lists SPY's gross expense ratio at 0.0945%.
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100.
The index is designed to represent 100 of the largest eligible non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq.
This produces significant exposure to:
SPY seeks to track the price and yield performance of the S&P 500.
S&P Dow Jones Indices says the S&P 500 includes 500 leading companies and covers approximately 80% of available U.S. market capitalization.
State Street describes the S&P 500 as a diversified large-cap index spanning all eleven GICS sectors.
This is one of the biggest differences.
Invesco reported that QQQ's average Technology weight in June 2026 was 67.29% under its reporting classification.
State Street's S&P 500 sector data showed Information Technology at approximately 36.83% as of July 27, 2026.
The exact percentages change, but the direction is clear:
QQQ has materially greater technology concentration than SPY.
Many major holdings overlap.
For example, both have significant exposure to companies such as:
State Street's July 2026 SPY data shows these companies among its largest holdings.
The difference is mainly how much weight each ETF assigns and which additional companies are included.
SPY includes companies across:
QQQ is much more concentrated in growth-oriented Nasdaq companies.
Therefore:
SPY is not “the opposite of technology.”
It simply has broader sector exposure.
The Nasdaq-100 is designed around non-financial companies.
SPY includes large financial institutions.
State Street's July 27 sector data showed financials at approximately 12.6% of the S&P 500.
This means banks and insurers can materially influence SPY while having far less direct impact on QQQ.
QQQ:
0.18%
SPY:
0.0945%
For a hypothetical $10,000 investment:
QQQ:
approximately $18 per year
SPY:
approximately $9.45 per year
before changes in asset value.
The difference is relatively small in absolute dollars but compounds over long periods.
Both have significant AI exposure because many of the world's largest AI-related companies are included in both indexes.
However, QQQ typically gives those technology and semiconductor businesses higher aggregate weighting.
This makes QQQ potentially more sensitive to:
SPY is broader by:
QQQ still spreads risk across many companies, but Invesco formally describes it as non-diversified for regulatory purposes and warns about concentration.
No.
In June 2026, QQQ lost approximately 0.14% at NAV, while the S&P 500 lost approximately 0.95%, meaning QQQ outperformed that month.
But individual months or historical periods do not guarantee future leadership.
QQQ can outperform when growth and technology lead.
SPY may outperform when:
lead the market.
QQQ may appeal to investors seeking:
SPY may appeal to investors seeking:
Yes, but there is substantial overlap.
Owning both does not simply create two completely different portfolios.
Because the largest technology companies are present in both, investors should check the resulting combined weights before assuming the combination greatly increases diversification.
QQQON is linked specifically to QQQ, not SPY.
The chain is:
Nasdaq-100 → QQQ → QQQON
For the underlying QQQ fundamentals, read What Is Invesco QQQ ETF?.
There is no universal answer. They provide different sector and growth exposures.
SPY currently has the lower expense ratio: 0.0945% versus QQQ's 0.18%.
QQQ.
Yes.
No.
No. QQQON is linked to QQQ.
Neither QQQ nor SPY guarantees profit. Both can experience substantial losses during equity-market downturns, and historical relative performance should not be treated as a forecast.

比特币硬件钱包制造商Coinkite已警告用户,Coldcard设备存在种子生成问题,影响从4.0.1版本起的所有Mk3固件版本。该警告是在安全研究人员调查一起涉及594.48 BTC(约合3,800万美元)的协同转移事件时发出的。然而,目前尚无公开的技术证据证实Coldcard的问题导致了这些转账。

辉达的毛利率刚刚连续第三季度维持在接近 75% 的水准。 而在同一份新闻稿里,公司下修了这个数字的指引。 营收仍在加速——截至 2026 年 7 月 26 日的当季达 962 亿美元,比一年前的两倍还多,而下一季的指引则是 1,080 亿美元。 也就是说,公司一边加速增长,一边在每一美元营收上赚得更少;而这一组张力解释了大部分的原因,这组张力也是为什么覆盖同一家公司的分析师,连一年后的目标价都无法

AI 推理需要的不只是算力,大规模部署同样需要不断增长、能够快速访问且具备成本效率的存储容量。 NAND 正逐步成为与 HBM、DRAM 并存的 AI 容量层,而不再只是传统商品型存储产品。 Sandisk 预计,到 2030 年企业数据中心闪存需求将达到 1.2 ZB,并正在开发专门面向 AI 推理的 High Bandwidth Flash。 Sandisk、Samsung 等存储厂商开始采用

Key Takeaways Microsoft、Amazon、Alphabet 和 Meta 在 2026 年仍在大规模投入 AI 基础设施和数据中心。 Nvidia 仍是最直接的 AI 资本支出受益者之一,但 AI 云、服务器、网络和光通信也开始呈现明确增长。 CoreWeave、Nebius、Dell 和 Broadcom 提供了 AI 支出转化为营收、订单和待履约收入最清晰的证据之一。 随着