HBM, short for high-bandwidth memory, is memory built as a vertical stack of chips placed directly beside a processor so data can move at extreme speed. It has become the memory of choice for AIHBM, short for high-bandwidth memory, is memory built as a vertical stack of chips placed directly beside a processor so data can move at extreme speed. It has become the memory of choice for AI
新手学院/Trading Guide/US Stocks/What Is HBM? Why High-Bandwidth Memory Matters for AI Stocks

What Is HBM? Why High-Bandwidth Memory Matters for AI Stocks

初阶
Sep 21, 2026Emma Williams
6 分钟
HBM, short for high-bandwidth memory, is memory built as a vertical stack of chips placed directly beside a processor so data can move at extreme speed. It has become the memory of choice for AI chips, and because only three companies make it well, HBM has turned SK Hynix, Micron, and Samsung into closely watched AI stocks.

What Is HBM?


To see what makes HBM special, it helps to picture ordinary memory first. In a normal computer, memory chips lie flat on a board and connect to the processor through a limited number of wires. That works for everyday tasks, but it caps how much data can flow at once.

HBM rethinks the design in two ways. It stacks memory chips vertically, one on top of another, and drills thousands of microscopic channels straight down through them, called through-silicon vias, so every layer can pass data at the same time. Then it places the whole stack right next to the processor on a shared base, rather than off to the side. The payoff is bandwidth, the total amount of data that can move per second, and HBM delivers far more of it than the alternatives while using less power for each unit of data.

Memory type
Typical use
What sets it apart
Standard DRAM
Laptops, phones, servers
Affordable and flexible, moderate speed
GDDR
Gaming graphics cards
Fast, but held back by a flat layout
HBM
AI accelerators, data centers
Highest bandwidth, stacked beside the chip

What Problem Does HBM Solve for AI?


AI chips face a problem that sounds backwards: they are often too fast for their own memory. A modern accelerator holds thousands of computing cores, but those cores can only work on data that reaches them. When memory cannot deliver data quickly enough, the cores wait, and expensive silicon sits idle. Engineers call this the memory wall, and it is the single biggest reason HBM exists.

Large AI models push hard against that wall. A model with hundreds of billions of parameters constantly moves data back and forth during training and inference, so bandwidth, not raw calculating power, becomes the limit. HBM tears the wall down by parking a huge, fast memory pool right beside the cores. The proof shows up in how much HBM each new AI chip carries.

AI accelerator
HBM on board
Memory bandwidth
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3
3.35 TB/s
Nvidia H200
141 GB HBM3E
4.8 TB/s
Nvidia B200
180 GB HBM3E
around 7.7 TB/s
AMD MI300X
192 GB HBM3
around 5.3 TB/s
AMD MI355X
288 GB HBM3E
up to 8 TB/s
More HBM Per Chip Means More Revenue

Every jump in that table is more HBM revenue for the memory makers, which is why they have moved from the background of the chip industry to the center of the AI trade.

How Did HBM Become Such a Large Market?


HBM demand comes almost entirely from AI. Phones, PCs, and gaming barely move the needle now; what matters is how many AI accelerators cloud companies install, and each one carries more HBM than the last. That has turned a niche product into one of the chip industry's fastest-growing categories. Bank of America estimated the HBM market would reach around $55 billion in 2026, a rise of roughly 58% in one year, according to an SK Hynix market outlook.

Inside that growth are two shifts worth watching. The mainstream product, HBM3E, was expected to account for about two-thirds of shipments in 2026, while the next generation, HBM4, started entering production. At the same time, custom AI chips designed in-house by cloud providers were projected to become a fast-rising source of demand, widening HBM's customer base beyond the familiar GPU makers. For a cyclical, high-growth market like this, reading the multiples investors are willing to pay is its own skill, covered in this guide to valuation indicators like PE, PB, PS, and PEG.

Who Are the Three HBM Makers?


Manufacturing HBM is hard enough that only three companies do it at scale, and that scarcity is what makes them investable proxies for AI memory demand.

SK Hynix sits at the front. Widely seen as Nvidia's main HBM supplier, it held roughly 57% of the HBM market in late 2025, and the payoff was dramatic: record 2025 revenue of about ₩97 trillion, up nearly 50% from a year earlier, with HBM revenue more than doubling. It was also first in the industry to mass-produce the next-generation HBM4.

Micron is the main US-based maker and the fastest-rising challenger, scaling up HBM3E output and winning more AI server business. Because around 80% of Micron's revenue comes from DRAM, its move into high-value AI memory carries real weight for earnings. Samsung, the largest memory company overall, slipped behind in HBM but was pushing to recover through HBM3E and HBM4 and clearing key customer qualifications along the way. Together these three are the HBM trade.


Why Is Packaging as Important as the Memory Itself?

One point often gets missed: HBM is not only a memory story, it is a packaging story. Getting a memory stack to work beside a processor takes advanced packaging, the precise assembly steps that physically join the two. The through-silicon vias inside the stack, the exact 3D stacking, and the technology that mounts memory next to the processor, such as CoWoS, are all hard manufacturing problems on their own.

That dependency creates a hidden bottleneck. Even when memory supply is plentiful, AI accelerator shipments can stall if there is not enough packaging capacity to assemble the finished chips, which is why this stage links memory makers directly to the foundries that perform it, a role explained in this guide to what a foundry does and how TSMC fits the AI supply chain. For investors, the takeaway is that HBM demand alone does not guarantee shipments; the packaging step has to keep pace too.

What Are the Risks?


The biggest risk is the one built into memory itself: cycles. Memory prices have always swung between shortage and glut, and although AI has fueled a powerful up-cycle, that history has not been repealed. A guide to reading sector rotation and shifts in market leadership is useful context for how quickly leadership can turn on cyclical names like memory.


Three more risks sit alongside it. Supply and packaging limits can cap production even when demand is strong. Technology transitions are relentless, since makers must keep marching from HBM3 to HBM3E to HBM4, and falling behind in that race can cost market share fast. And competition is building: Chinese memory makers such as CXMT are expanding conventional DRAM output, as Reuters has reported, and even though they trail the leaders in advanced HBM, more ordinary memory supply can still pressure prices across the industry. Live pricing for memory and other semiconductor names is available on the MEXC stock markets page.

FAQ


What does HBM stand for?

HBM stands for high-bandwidth memory, a design that stacks memory chips vertically and places them beside a processor. It delivers far more data bandwidth than standard memory, which is exactly what AI chips need.

Why is HBM more expensive than regular memory?

HBM requires vertical stacking, thousands of through-silicon vias, and advanced packaging to connect it to the processor. Those extra steps are difficult and limit output, which keeps prices high.

Which company is the biggest HBM maker?

SK Hynix is the largest HBM supplier, with roughly 57% of the market in late 2025 and a position as Nvidia's main supplier. Micron and Samsung are the other two major producers.

What is the difference between HBM3E and HBM4?

HBM3E is today's mainstream standard, used in most AI accelerators now shipping, while HBM4 is the next generation with higher bandwidth and capacity. HBM4 entered production in late 2025 and is expected to power the next wave of AI chips.

热门文章

查看更多
MEXC vs BitradeX:BTC 合约手续费 0.07% 对比 0.02%,交易一个月要花多少?

MEXC vs BitradeX:BTC 合约手续费 0.07% 对比 0.02%,交易一个月要花多少?

按 BitradeX 自家公布的 0.07% 吃单(Taker)费率和 MEXC 的 0.02% 计算,每月用市价单完成 12 次、每次 30,000 USDT 的 BTC 永续合约开平仓,BitradeX 要付 504 USDT,MEXC 则是 144 USDT。 如果改用限价单,BitradeX 每月的费用会降到 144 USDT,正好等于 MEXC 使用市价单的费用,而 MEXC 则降为零。

MEXC vs YUBIT:只用限价单交易 BTC 合约,两家手续费各要多少?

MEXC vs YUBIT:只用限价单交易 BTC 合约,两家手续费各要多少?

每月进行 15 次、每次 20,000 USDT 的来回交易,且开仓与平仓都使用限价单时,在 MEXC 的 BTCUSDT 合约上不用付任何手续费,在 YUBIT 则要付 240 USDT,原因在于 MEXC 向挂单方(Maker)收取 0% 手续费,YUBIT 则收取 0.04%。 若改用市价单,同样一个月在 MEXC 要付 120 USDT,在 YUBIT 则要付 480 USDT。 Key

MEXC vs CrypFine:每周定投买币一年,两家各要付多少手续费?

MEXC vs CrypFine:每周定投买币一年,两家各要付多少手续费?

每周以市价买入 1,000 USDT、持续一年,手续费在 CrypFine 是 52 USDT,在 MEXC 是 26 USDT;如果每笔都改用挂在订单簿上等待成交的限价单,MEXC 则完全不收手续费。 CrypFine 的现货交易,挂单(Maker)与吃单(Taker)两边都收 0.1% 手续费。 Key Takeaways 对每周定投的用户来说,MEXC 是我们的首选:每周市价买入 1,000

MEXC vs Bitbase:Bitbase 要到哪个 VIP 等级,才追得上 MEXC 的合约基本费率?

MEXC vs Bitbase:Bitbase 要到哪个 VIP 等级,才追得上 MEXC 的合约基本费率?

在 ETH 永续合约上,答案是一个都没有:Bitbase 最低的合约吃单方(Taker)费率是 VIP7 的 0.02%,仍是 MEXC ETHUSDT 费率 0.01% 的两倍,对比 MEXC 的 BTCUSDT 也只是持平。 而要达到 VIP7,需要 30 日合约交易量达 1 亿 USDT,或账户余额达 1,000 万 USDT。 Key Takeaways 对合约交易者来说,无论对照 Bit

相关文章

查看更多
辉达股价预测:AI 热潮开始侵蚀辉达自己的利润了吗?

辉达股价预测:AI 热潮开始侵蚀辉达自己的利润了吗?

辉达的毛利率刚刚连续第三季度维持在接近 75% 的水准。 而在同一份新闻稿里,公司下修了这个数字的指引。 营收仍在加速——截至 2026 年 7 月 26 日的当季达 962 亿美元,比一年前的两倍还多,而下一季的指引则是 1,080 亿美元。 也就是说,公司一边加速增长,一边在每一美元营收上赚得更少;而这一组张力解释了大部分的原因,这组张力也是为什么覆盖同一家公司的分析师,连一年后的目标价都无法

AI 推理正在改变 NAND 周期吗?Sandisk 对存储芯片股意味着什么

AI 推理正在改变 NAND 周期吗?Sandisk 对存储芯片股意味着什么

AI 推理需要的不只是算力,大规模部署同样需要不断增长、能够快速访问且具备成本效率的存储容量。 NAND 正逐步成为与 HBM、DRAM 并存的 AI 容量层,而不再只是传统商品型存储产品。 Sandisk 预计,到 2030 年企业数据中心闪存需求将达到 1.2 ZB,并正在开发专门面向 AI 推理的 High Bandwidth Flash。 Sandisk、Samsung 等存储厂商开始采用

2026 AI 基础设施股票:谁真正受益于 Big Tech 的 AI 资本支出?

2026 AI 基础设施股票:谁真正受益于 Big Tech 的 AI 资本支出?

Key Takeaways Microsoft、Amazon、Alphabet 和 Meta 在 2026 年仍在大规模投入 AI 基础设施和数据中心。 Nvidia 仍是最直接的 AI 资本支出受益者之一,但 AI 云、服务器、网络和光通信也开始呈现明确增长。 CoreWeave、Nebius、Dell 和 Broadcom 提供了 AI 支出转化为营收、订单和待履约收入最清晰的证据之一。 随着

苹果(AAPL)目标价与股价预测:产能跟不上,股价还能涨到 400 美元吗?

苹果(AAPL)目标价与股价预测:产能跟不上,股价还能涨到 400 美元吗?

Key Takeaways 华尔街对苹果的共识目标价为 321.66 美元,个别分析师的预估则从 215 美元到 400 美元不等。2026 年 7 月 30 日,尽管苹果交出史上最强的 6 月当季财报、营收达 1,094 亿美元,AAPL 仍在盘后延长时段下跌约 6%。服务业务与大中华区营收双双低于分析师预估,苹果并将 9 月当季营收成长业绩指引下修至 9% 至 11%。苹果表示瓶颈在于供给而非

注册MEXC账号
注册 & 获得高达10,000 USDT奖金
别被骗了——市占率下降不等于山寨季
别被骗了——市占率下降不等于山寨季别被骗了——市占率下降不等于山寨季
比特币下跌也会压低市占率,四个指标同时转向才是真信号!

加入 MEXC 社区

通过我们的官方 Telegram 频道,实时获取最新上币、活动和动态。

25k+ 位成员