TLDR Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today. Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs. The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems. Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the [...] The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today. Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs. The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems. Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the [...] The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.

Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped

2025/12/09 06:24

TLDR

  • Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today.
  • Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs.
  • The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems.
  • Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s.

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the impact of quantum computing on blockchain technology. He asserts that the threat posed by quantum computing to cryptocurrencies is currently overstated and not an immediate risk. In a recent podcast discussion, Hoskinson referred to the quantum threat as a “big red herring,” emphasizing that while quantum-resistant cryptography exists, its adoption would come at a significant cost in terms of both speed and expense.

Hoskinson’s remarks were aimed at easing fears in the blockchain industry about an impending quantum disruption. He made it clear that although quantum-secure protocols are available, the trade-offs in performance—about ten times slower and more expensive—make their adoption unappealing for most networks. As blockchain networks strive for high transaction throughput, such a drastic reduction in speed would not be acceptable, he pointed out.

The Need for Standardization in Quantum-Secure Cryptography

One of the core issues Hoskinson highlighted is the lack of standardized quantum-secure cryptographic protocols. He stressed that the blockchain industry should wait for standardized guidance, which is being developed by organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST’s post-quantum cryptography program, including standards FIPS 203–206, is aimed at ensuring that quantum-resistant algorithms are not only secure but also efficient.

According to Hoskinson, the lack of standardization presents a risk for blockchain developers. Without these standards, networks may adopt quantum-resistant protocols that are inefficient or unsupported in the future. He explained that choosing non-standard solutions could result in performance penalties, making blockchain networks slower and more costly to run. Until NIST finalizes the standards and hardware vendors begin aligning with them, blockchain networks will likely avoid premature quantum-proof upgrades.

The Quantum Threat Timeline and DARPA’s Role

While many researchers believe quantum computing could disrupt blockchain security, Hoskinson and other experts agree that this threat is still some years away. He pointed to DARPA’s Quantum Blockchain Initiative (QBI) as a key reference for understanding the timeline for quantum computing advancements. The initiative, which is exploring the scalability of practical quantum computers, suggests that real concerns for quantum blockchain security are unlikely to arise before the 2030s.

Hoskinson cited the QBI’s evaluation of 11 companies working on quantum computing and stated that the military, in particular, needs to know when it will be necessary to upgrade its cryptographic systems. The work being done by DARPA, he noted, serves as the clearest benchmark for understanding when quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption might be available at scale.

When Will Blockchains Need to Migrate to Quantum-Resistant Systems?

While the quantum threat is real, Hoskinson’s message is clear: blockchain networks do not need to rush into migration. The pressure to adopt quantum-secure systems will increase gradually, with most experts predicting that meaningful migration could begin in the 2030s.

 The focus for blockchain developers, according to Hoskinson, should be on ensuring that systems are both efficient and aligned with evolving hardware accelerations for quantum-resistant cryptography.

Currently, the cost, latency, and lack of ecosystem alignment prevent widespread adoption of quantum-resistant protocols in the blockchain space. Despite the slow pace of adoption, Hoskinson reassured listeners that the technology is already being tested and developed, with NIST-approved hardware and algorithms paving the way for a future transition when the quantum threat becomes more tangible.

The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions

OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions

The post OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. national banks have been passed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enable their customers perform instant crypto trades with no risk. This decision has cleared a significant obstacle in the way of banks that desire to be part of the expanding digital assets market. Banks Receive Clarity on Crypto Trading Authority  Interpretive Letter 1188 states that a bank can be an intermediary in crypto transactions without having digital assets in its possession. The OCC clarified that one client may sell a crypto asset to one bank and that bank will sell the asset to the other client at the same time. Since the two trades take place virtually at the same time the bank does not have an exposure to the market. The license provides banks with a regulated structure to provide crypto trading services. This is in line with preceding actions like enabling banks to hold major crypto assets. Another explanation that OCC provides is that the role of the bank is not to trade digital assets. Instead, the only responsibility of the bank is linking the sellers and the buyers. OCC Reinforces Bank’s Crypto Oversight The regulator mentioned that such transactions carry a limited amount of settlement risk. The decision is an update of a previous guidance that permitted crypto custody and some stablecoin transactions. The latest clarification strengthens the same allowances but indicates continued regulation of responsible crypto services in the banking space. With this, the banks are now enabled to provide customers with a secure means of accessing digital assets in compliance with federal regulations. The OCC stressed that institutions need to continue having robust risk controls, such as cybersecurity controls and compliance programs. Hence, all their operations can be safe and in line with current rules. How Institutions Might…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 07:46