TLDR U.S. lawmakers are facing difficulties in finalizing a comprehensive crypto bill that defines agency roles and market regulations. Senator Bernie Moreno expressed frustration with ongoing discussions and emphasized the importance of not passing a bad bill. The House passed its version of the crypto bill in July, but the Senate is struggling to reconcile [...] The post Senate Crypto Bill Talks Stalled as Lawmakers Struggle to Reach Agreement appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR U.S. lawmakers are facing difficulties in finalizing a comprehensive crypto bill that defines agency roles and market regulations. Senator Bernie Moreno expressed frustration with ongoing discussions and emphasized the importance of not passing a bad bill. The House passed its version of the crypto bill in July, but the Senate is struggling to reconcile [...] The post Senate Crypto Bill Talks Stalled as Lawmakers Struggle to Reach Agreement appeared first on CoinCentral.

Senate Crypto Bill Talks Stalled as Lawmakers Struggle to Reach Agreement

2025/12/10 07:07

TLDR

  • U.S. lawmakers are facing difficulties in finalizing a comprehensive crypto bill that defines agency roles and market regulations.
  • Senator Bernie Moreno expressed frustration with ongoing discussions and emphasized the importance of not passing a bad bill.
  • The House passed its version of the crypto bill in July, but the Senate is struggling to reconcile its draft with the House’s version.
  • The Senate Banking Committee is working on a draft bill that aims to clarify the roles of the SEC and CFTC in regulating crypto assets.
  • Lawmakers are aiming for a markup hearing on the crypto bill in mid-December, but delays may push the process into the new year.

U.S. lawmakers are facing challenges as they try to develop a comprehensive crypto bill. The bill would clarify the roles of agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This difficulty arises despite recent progress in passing a law for stablecoins earlier this year.

As lawmakers continue to work on a crypto bill, Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno voiced frustration with the ongoing discussions. Moreno emphasized that he does not want to push through a bad bill just for the sake of passing something. He said, “There’s no better deal than a bad deal.”

Senator Moreno will meet with Democrats to discuss their points of view on the matter. However, he expressed dissatisfaction with the opinions shared by some Democrats in recent weeks. He referred to these opinions as “pretty annoying” during his remarks at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit in Washington, D.C.

Different Versions of the Crypto Bill Move Forward in the House and Senate

The House of Representatives approved its version of a crypto bill in July. This version, known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, seeks to regulate the crypto ecosystem. After passing in the House, however, lawmakers face a more challenging task in the Senate.

The Senate is working on a different version of the crypto bill. The Senate Banking Committee, under the leadership of Republicans, has developed a draft. This draft defines the roles of the SEC and CFTC in regulating the crypto market.

This proposed bill also introduces a new term for ancillary assets. The new terminology would help clarify which cryptocurrencies are not classified as securities. This is one of the key differences between the House and Senate versions of the crypto bill.

Sources suggest that the Senate Banking Committee may collaborate with the Senate Agriculture Committee. The Agriculture Committee is reportedly working on a draft that would provide the CFTC with new powers over the crypto market. This collaboration could lead to important changes before the bill reaches the voting stage.

Senate Committee Aims for December Markup Hearing Despite Delays

Senator Tim Scott, the chair of the Senate Banking Committee, expressed confidence that the committee could hold a markup hearing in mid-December. He told attendees at a “Crypto Christmas” event that the committee would be ready by December 17 or 18.

However, Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, disagreed with the timeline. Warner said it would be challenging to finalize the markup hearing before the holidays. He explained that the Senate is waiting for guidelines from the White House regarding quorum and ethics matters.

Warner’s comments highlight the ongoing delay in finalizing the crypto bill. While the House has already approved its version, the Senate faces difficulties in reconciling its own draft. This delay could push the final decision into the new year.

Lawmakers Continue to Debate the Future of the Crypto Bill

The road to passing a crypto bill has been slow, with disagreements over key provisions. One of the major points of contention is the role of the SEC and CFTC. The Senate Banking Committee’s draft bill aims to establish clear jurisdiction between these two agencies.

Lawmakers are working to resolve differences between the two versions of the crypto bill. The reconciliation process could take weeks, and the bill’s passage may stretch into 2026. Both the House and Senate are focused on finding a way to regulate the crypto market effectively while protecting consumers.

Despite the challenges, lawmakers are determined to pass a comprehensive crypto bill. The ongoing discussions and upcoming meetings indicate that the process is far from over. As both committees continue their work, the final version of the bill remains uncertain.

The post Senate Crypto Bill Talks Stalled as Lawmakers Struggle to Reach Agreement appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

The post “I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “I am NOT building a new financial system. I built a casino.”This stark admission from Ken Chan, former co-founder of derivatives protocol Aevo, has been reverberating across Asian crypto communities this week. What began as a post on X has now crossed linguistic borders, been introduced to Chinese communities by local news media, and been widely shared among Korean traders, accumulating millions of views along the way. Sponsored Sponsored From Ayn Rand to Disillusionment: A Libertarian’s Journey Through Crypto Chan’s confession is not merely a critique—it is the unraveling of a personal ideology. He describes himself as a “starry-eyed libertarian” who donated to Gary Johnson’s 2016 presidential campaign after being radicalized by Ayn Rand’s novels. The cypherpunk ethos of Bitcoin spoke directly to this worldview. “Being able to walk across the border with a billion dollars in your head is and always will be a powerful idea to me,” he writes. Yet eight years of industry experience eroded that idealism. Chan recounts how the Layer 1 wars—the flood of capital into Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, and countless others—produced no meaningful progress toward a new financial system. Instead, it “literally torched everyone’s money” in pursuit of becoming the next Solana. His verdict is unsparing: “We do not need to build the Casino on Mars.” According to his LinkedIn profile, Chan departed Aevo in May this year. His personal website indicates he is now working on KENSAT, a personal satellite project. It is scheduled to launch aboard a Falcon 9 in June 2026. His confession arrives six months after his departure. It comes as AEVO token trades at roughly $45 million in fully diluted market cap—down approximately 99% from its peak. Chan’s central metaphor—that crypto has become “the biggest, online, multi-player 24/7 casino our generation has ever concocted”—cuts through technical complexity with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 11:04
Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

The post Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has warned that Bitcoin developers must prepare for a potential quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures outdated. Summary At the All-In Summit, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko reignited debate over Bitcoin’s long-term security. There’s a “50/50” chance that quantum computers could break its cryptographic defenses within five years. Rapid advances in AI show how quickly theory can become reality. The question is not just if Bitcoin must migrate to quantum-safe cryptography—but when. According to Yakovenko, who was speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, there is a “50/50” probability that within five years, quantum computers will be strong enough to crack the cryptographic safeguards protecting Bitcoin wallets. The concern centers on quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin (BTC) private keys. This would allow attackers to forge transactions and compromise wallets, creating an existential risk for the network. Yakovenko argued that “we should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme” before such technology becomes viable. Skeptics like Blockstream’s Adam Back downplay immediacy of threat The Bitcoin community remains divided on the urgency of quantum threats. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still relatively far away and argued that making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.” Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd dismissed current quantum computers as non-existent, stating that “demos running toy problems do not count.” Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, suggested quantum threats pose less immediate danger than spam transactions and developer corruption issues the community currently faces. Bitcoin’s design complicates any quantum upgrade. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process needing widespread network support. Yakovenko countered skepticism by pointing to quick AI advances as evidence of how…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 01:33