The post Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy. Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate. It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves. The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin. The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style. Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability? Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index. The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets. Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based… The post Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy. Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate. It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves. The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin. The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style. Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability? Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index. The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets. Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based…

Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan

2025/12/11 02:41

Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy.

Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal

The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate.

It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves.

The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin.

The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style.

Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability?

Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index.

The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets.

Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based exclusions. Still, negotiations between MSCI and MicroStrategy continues ahead of a January 15th review deadline.

According to the letter, the MSCI proposal is also against the current administration’s drive for digital asset development. Strategy mentioned that the initiatives of federal authorities is to encourage the use of Bitcoin and encourage the development and use of crypto assets.

Will MSCI Allow Markets to Decide DATs’ Value?

Strategy urged MSCI to let markets determine the value of digital asset treasury (DATs) companies. It said history shows that early technology leaders often face skepticism before driving major economic change.

The firm asked MSCI to maintain a neutral role and avoid shaping policy through index rules. It also asked MSCI to extend the consultation if concerns remain. Strategy said the best path forward is a deeper review that reflects the rapid evolution of digital asset technologies.

Source: https://coingape.com/strategy-challenges-msci-over-bitcoin-treasury-exclusion-plan/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

United States Monthly Budget Statement registered at $-173B above expectations ($-205B) in November

United States Monthly Budget Statement registered at $-173B above expectations ($-205B) in November

The post United States Monthly Budget Statement registered at $-173B above expectations ($-205B) in November appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 03:31