Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko says the chain must continue evolving to remain useful. Comments follow Ethereum’s “walkaway test” debate and new traction inSolana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko says the chain must continue evolving to remain useful. Comments follow Ethereum’s “walkaway test” debate and new traction in

Solana Must Never Stop Iterating or It Will “Die,” Says Co-Founder Anatoly Yakovenko

  • Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko says the chain must continue evolving to remain useful.
  • Comments follow Ethereum’s “walkaway test” debate and new traction in tokenized real-world assets.

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has stated that the Solana network must never stop evolving, or it will risk dying. He emphasized that the protocol must continuously adapt to meet the needs of its developers and users, even if those changes do not always come from the core teams like Anza, Labs, or the Foundation.

Yakovenko made the comments in response to a wider community discussion triggered by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. Buterin recently said that Ethereum must reach a point where it can “ossify,” meaning it can stop changing without losing value. He added that Ethereum should pass the “walkaway test,” which means the protocol must remain useful and secure even if active development slows or stops entirely. This aligns with Ethereum’s upcoming 2026 upgrades, as we previously covered, which focus on privacy, decentralization, and user self-sovereignty. 

However, Yakovenko has pushed back against this idea. He said that for Solana to remain valuable, it must be constantly useful to developers. Those developers should generate enough value from their apps on Solana to reinvest in protocol improvements. These upgrades, he said, must solve real problems faced by users or builders.

He also suggested that large language models (LLMs) might eventually write and verify protocol upgrade proposals. In that world, the cost of generating a new SIMD proposal might be covered by a vote that funds GPU usage. While the comment was partly hypothetical, it reflects Yakovenko’s belief that the process of improvement must continue, even in a decentralized setting.

Solana’s Protocol Debate Comes Amid RWA Growth 

The exchange of ideas between Ethereum and Solana leaders comes as both networks grow in different directions. As Ethereum is looking into ossification, Solana is expanding its transaction capacity and ecosystem tools. According to CNF, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) on Solana reached $873.3 million at the start of 2026. 

Yakovenko has explained that saying “no” to most change proposals is normal, but progress must not stall. If the network stops changing in response to user needs, he said, it could lose its relevance.

The broader community echoed these concerns. Sei co-founder Jayendra Jog noted that change moves more slowly when no core group leads upgrades. He compared it to Bitcoin, where new proposals take years to pass due to internal debates. Yakovenko disagreed, saying technical specs are not the issue. Instead, he believes that coordination and testnet validation are the true hurdles, and AI could streamline both in the future.

Yakovenko concluded that the network’s evolution must always be focused on developer and user needs. He said solving every issue is not required, but solving the right ones keeps the protocol alive.

However, Solana’s price has seen its own share of problems recently after the recent trade war between the United States and the EU. With Bitcoin falling below $92,000, SOL price has followed the trend, trading at $133.71, a 6% decline from the resistance level.

]]>
Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0,01551
$0,01551$0,01551
+6,74%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.