The post ENS Technical Analysis Feb 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ENS’s 24-hour trading volume is hovering at the $13.06 million level, and volume participationThe post ENS Technical Analysis Feb 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ENS’s 24-hour trading volume is hovering at the $13.06 million level, and volume participation

ENS Technical Analysis Feb 28

ENS’s 24-hour trading volume is hovering at the $13.06 million level, and volume participation remains low during recent declines; this indicates weak selling pressure and provides possible accumulation signals. Overall market participation is limited, but traces of smart money are visible at critical support levels according to the volume profile.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

ENS’s current volume profile is below the average of recent weeks with a 24-hour trading volume of $13.06 million. This level shows low market participation; especially in the last 24 hours where the price recorded a 4.54% decline, no volume increase was observed. In volume profile analysis, the POC (Point of Control) region where the price concentrated at $5.88 has formed around $6.00 and this area is supported by high-volume nodes. Low-volume down moves imply that sellers are not launching a strong attack; instead, a scenario prevails where buyers are waiting on the sidelines.

From a market participation perspective, retail traders’ interest appears to have decreased. While RSI at 38.46 is approaching the oversold region, the calm in volume confirms the absence of panic selling. According to multi-timeframe (MTF) volume data, a total of 10 strong levels have been identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes: 1 support/2 resistance on 1D, 1 support/2 resistance on 3D, 2 support/3 resistance on 1W. This distribution shows that resistances dominate in the short term, but weekly supports create opportunities for accumulation. Volume delta analysis reveals that negative delta is low during recent declines; meaning selling volume does not fully confirm the price movement.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation signals are particularly evident in low-volume declines. Although the price is below EMA20 ($6.46), the volume average running 20-30% below suggests that institutional buyers are quietly accumulating positions. Despite Supertrend being bearish and strong resistance at $7.53, the $5.6547 support level (score 76/100) is reinforced by volume; volume spikes here show positive divergence. With the MACD histogram turning bullish, the hidden positive flow in volume (positive volume divergence) indicates that smart money is hunting for bottoms. Similar patterns were observed before past ENS rallies.

If accumulation prevails, the expected scenario: Gradual volume increase testing the $6.1150 resistance (score 64/100). If this level breaks, it could open the path to a bullish target of $8.5350 (score 26).

Distribution Risks

Distribution risks are hidden in upward moves without volume explosions. The current low volume does not support distribution, but if the $6.5691 resistance (score 65/100) breaks without volume confirmation, there is a fakeout risk. For the bearish target of $2.7836 (score 22), a sharp decline with volume spikes is required. The volume drying up in the current downtrend weakens distribution, but it could be triggered by BTC pressure.

Price-Volume Harmony

In price-volume harmony analysis, the recent 4.54% decline occurred with low volume; there is no high-volume selling expected for a healthy downtrend. This divergence shows that the price is weak and carries reversal potential. While RSI at 38.46 shows weakening bearish momentum, the MACD bullish histogram confirms the volume. Volume confirmation is lacking in up moves: Previous rallies had $10M+ volume, but now even $13M overall volume remains limited. Unhealthy volume: Sharp declines with low participation are not sustainable; as seen in ENS, price action is unreliable without volume confirmation.

Educational note: Volume increase is essential for a healthy rally; above 50%+ average volume. ENS currently has an unhealthy down move, but divergence creates a bullish bias. Check detailed charts for ENS Spot Analysis and ENS Futures Analysis.

Big Player Activity

Big player activity is tracked in high-volume nodes in the volume profile. There are institutional footprints in the $5.65-$6.00 range: Price holding without sudden volume spikes implies whale accumulation. On-balance volume (OBV) shows a slightly positive trend despite price decline. Divergence is critical here: OBV remains stable while price does not make new lows. We don’t know exact positions, but patterns (Wyckoff accumulation schematics) match the bottom accumulation phase. Whale wallet movements are low, no panic; silent buying signal.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $64,926 with -1.53% decline in downtrend; Supertrend bearish and supports in $64,286-$60,000 range. ENS is highly correlated with BTC (0.85+), BTC decline pressures altcoins. If BTC does not break $65,872 resistance, ENS $5.65 support may be tested. If BTC dominance rises, ENS weakens; conversely, if BTC reaches $68k, ENS bullish target $8.53 activates. Key BTC levels: Support breakdown creates bearish spillover.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook is cautiously bullish: Low-volume down moves signal exhaustion, favoring accumulation. Short-term $6.11 test, $8.53 target with volume confirmation. Risk: $2.78 with BTC crash. Wait for breakout above volume average; participation is low now but divergence is strong. Long-term, MTF supports support the accumulation story.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ens-technical-analysis-february-28-2026-volume-and-accumulation

Market Opportunity
ENS Logo
ENS Price(ENS)
$5.948
$5.948$5.948
+1.05%
USD
ENS (ENS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.