'By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of'By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of

US lawmakers raise concerns about Intel’s testing of tools from China-linked firm

2026/03/05 11:49
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

WASHINGTON, USA – A bipartisan group of US lawmakers led by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Republican Tom Cotton on Wednesday, March 4, raised national security concerns over Intel’s testing of chipmaking tools made by ACM Research, as first reported by Reuters.

ACM Research, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment, has deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions. Its customers include sanctioned Chinese companies such as YMTC and SMIC, sparking questions over whether ACM could pass sensitive information from Intel to Chinese customers, the lawmakers said.

“By operating in Intel’s facilities, ACM could gain exposure to cutting-edge chipmaking processes that may materially improve the quality and competitiveness of ACM and Chinese military companies,” the lawmakers said in a letter to Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan dated Wednesday.

Intel said in a statement that “ACM tools are not used in Intel’s semiconductor production processes,” adding that the company fully complies with US laws and regulations and engages regularly with the US government on security matters.

ACM did not immediately respond to a request for comment for this story.

The company previously said it could not comment on “specific customer engagements,” but said it has disclosed the shipment of three tools to a “major US-based semiconductor manufacturer,” which are being tested and some have met performance standards.

ACM said previously that it does not pose a national security threat, noting that its US operations are “bifurcated and isolated” from the sanctioned Shanghai-based unit, adding that US customers are supported directly by US personnel, with robust safeguards to protect customer trade secrets.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The letter, also signed by Democrats Elissa Slotkin and Andy Kim as well as Republicans Jim Banks and Pete Ricketts, is a sign of bipartisan concern about China’s growing role in US semiconductor manufacturing.

The House Selection Committee on China said in October it has “reviewed with concern reports that ACM Research… has sold (semiconductor manufacturing equipment) to a semiconductor manufacturer with US operations that also formally certified ACM Research’s tools for use in its production line.”

The lawmakers on Wednesday also noted that Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, faces unique responsibilities, since the US government now owns a stake in it.

“This raises important questions about Intel’s fiduciary responsibility and approach to safeguarding the public interest, including how the company benefits American economic interests and taxpayers,” they wrote.

“Intel’s entanglements with blacklisted Chinese companies calls into question whether taxpayer dollars are subsidizing activities that could directly threaten US national security and leadership in semiconductor manufacturing,” they added. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
AC Milan Fan Token Logo
AC Milan Fan Token Price(ACM)
$0.432
$0.432$0.432
-1.12%
USD
AC Milan Fan Token (ACM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

The Bank of Russia has proposed allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain licenses to operate crypto exchanges, a move that would place traditional financial
Share
Financemagnates2026/03/05 22:54
CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME Group is launching options for Solana and XRP futures this October. The move signals a major shift, acknowledging that institutional liquidity is now firmly expanding beyond the established dominance of Bitcoin and Ether. According to a press release dated…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 01:18
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29