Coinbase has filed a formal challenge against what it describes as a politically motivated banking rule, accusing federal regulators of pressuring banks to cut ties with crypto firms through the misuse of “reputational risk,” a term the company calls vague and unaccountable, and has urged its full removal from regulatory guidelines.
Coinbase expressed support for a proposed rule by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The proposal aims to remove “reputational risk” from the agencies’ supervisory frameworks for banks.
Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s chief policy officer, stated the rule has been weaponized against lawful crypto activities. He said regulators used the concept as a “supervisory hammer” against banks serving crypto clients.
Coinbase claimed that reputational risk lacks a clear definition and measurable standards, making it prone to misuse. It warned that this allows political agendas to influence banking decisions.
The company urged that supervision focus only on quantifiable risks tied to law, safety, or soundness. Shirzad noted, “Subjective standards invite arbitrary enforcement, not transparency.”
Coinbase has asked the agencies to go beyond the current proposal. It wants a full ban on the use of reputational or similar risks.
The company stressed that partial reforms may not stop the practice from returning under different terms. It said banks may still deny service citing public image concerns.
In its letter, Coinbase included findings from Freedom of Information Act requests and related litigation. It claimed internal records revealed banks were discouraged from serving crypto clients.
According to Coinbase, communications between supervisors show specific crypto firms were flagged without legal basis. The company said it was directly affected.
Coinbase said the restrictions disrupted its employee banking access. It claimed these actions occurred without public accountability or due process.
The company said this pattern shows hidden supervision that harms legal businesses. It urged transparency and rule-based oversight.
It also called for adverse supervisory actions to link only to measurable risks. Coinbase listed credit, liquidity, operational, and compliance as examples.
Regulators have faced scrutiny over alleged informal efforts to restrict crypto industry access to banking services. Lawmakers and crypto leaders have raised concerns.
They claim regulators issued off-the-record warnings to banks. These discouraged services to crypto clients without formal rules.
Regulators deny the allegations. They argue decisions were based on anti-money-laundering obligations and general safety concerns.
In December, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon addressed these claims. He denied politically motivated account closures.
His response followed accusations from Strike CEO Jack Mallers. Mallers said his accounts were shut without explanation.
In the same month, the OCC published initial findings. It found all nine of the largest U.S. national banks had imposed improper restrictions.
These included actions taken against legal digital asset firms. Comptroller Jonathan Gould confirmed the practices violated fair banking access principles.
The OCC said the review covered 2020 to 2023. It was launched under a 2020 executive order promoting equal financial access.
The post Crypto Access Fight: Coinbase Slams Political Banking Pressure Tactic appeared first on CoinCentral.


