Polygon recorded a significant token burn in January, as 25.7 million POL were permanently burned. This accounts for approximately 0.24% of the total supply.
This demonstrates the direct effect of network utilization on token economics. According to data provided by the Polygon team, the more on-chain activity, the more supply is being burned.
Within the single month of January, Polygon managed to burn an impressive 25.7 million tokens through its mechanisms for PoS. It is arguably one of the highest burns recorded for this protocol within such a short time. The burn was achieved through transactions rather than manual burns.
This is because the design of POL’s token burns relates to real-world usage, such that the more transactions occur, the higher the amount of POL burned. With the increasing demand for the network, the burn rate will automatically adjust depending on the fees earned.
Also Read: Polygon (POL) Daily Chart Breakdown Targeting $0.178 Resistance
While 0.24% may seem insignificant as a percentage, one has to consider that this burn contributes to a gradual decrease in POL’s total circulating supply over time. While this may not have a significant effect in the short term, this model differs from a one-time burn as implemented by other networks.
Polygon estimates that with the current trends, close to 3% of the total POL supply will likely be burned by the end of 2026. The estimates heavily rely on the usage of the decentralized applications and infrastructure layers.
The token model used by Polygon focuses more on value accrual through usage rather than speculation. The more usage on the PoS chain, the more fees are generated, which in turn increases the number of tokens burned.
The strategy seeks to balance the long-term growth of the network with the economics of the token. Thus, the more the developers and users interact, the more the burn mechanism ensures the scarcity of the token without adding unnecessary complexity.
This January burn also reinforces Polygon’s transition to a usage-based economic system. Rather than depending on incentives or emissions, POL’s supply is increasingly determined by actual network demand. This could be attractive to participants who value sustainability.
As the Polygon universe expands, the future level of burns will possibly depend on the overall growth trend. Analyzing the monthly burns could offer some insights into the effectiveness of the growth of the network in the long term.
Also Read: Polygon (POL) Falling Wedge Forms: Is a Breakout Above $0.17 Next?


