Cypress tests often become flaky when developers assume cy.wait('@alias') waits for every new request. It doesn’t. Aliases capture only the first match, so later waits may resolve instantly. The fix: re-intercept before each occurrence or use times: 1 to create one-shot intercepts that “consume” themselves. But the real solution is avoiding network waits altogether. Instead, rely on user-visible, accessible UI states (spinners, aria-busy, disabled buttons, status messages). This makes tests stable, realistic, and far more reliable than waiting on network events.Cypress tests often become flaky when developers assume cy.wait('@alias') waits for every new request. It doesn’t. Aliases capture only the first match, so later waits may resolve instantly. The fix: re-intercept before each occurrence or use times: 1 to create one-shot intercepts that “consume” themselves. But the real solution is avoiding network waits altogether. Instead, rely on user-visible, accessible UI states (spinners, aria-busy, disabled buttons, status messages). This makes tests stable, realistic, and far more reliable than waiting on network events.

Achieving Reliable E2E Tests in Cypress: Overcome cy.wait Pitfalls

2025/11/26 13:14

Cypress gives frontend engineers a superpower: the ability to write E2E tests that watch our app behave just like a real user would. But with great power comes… well, a lot of subtle flakiness if you’re not careful.

The cy.wait Illusion: What's Really Happening

The scenario is simple: you have a component that loads data, and after a user action, it loads new data using the same API endpoint. To ensure the new data has arrived, you intercept the request and then use cy.wait('@requestAlias') multiple times.

// A common, flawed approach: cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items/*', { fixture: 'item-1' }).as('getItems'); cy.visit('/items'); // 1. Wait for the initial load cy.wait('@getItems'); // ... User performs an action that triggers the SAME request ... // 2. Wait for the second load cy.wait('@getItems'); // <-- THIS IS THE PROBLEM

The Flaw

Cypress's cy.intercept logic is designed to capture a single match for an alias. When you call cy.wait('@getItems') for the first time, it finds the initial request, waits for its resolution, and then the alias is fulfilled.

When you call cy.wait('@getItems') a second time, Cypress does not reset the listener. Instead, it checks if a request has already been resolved with that alias. Because the first request has resolved, the second cy.wait command resolves immediately, without waiting for the new network call to finish. Your test is now racing against the network, not waiting for it.

Fix #1: Re-intercept before each expected request

(Works, explicit, but verbose)

cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items').as('getItems_1') cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.wait('@getItems_1') cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items').as('getItems_2') cy.get('[data-testid=load-more]').click() cy.wait('@getItems_2')

Clear, deterministic, but repetitive.

Fix #2: Use times: 1 to force Cypress to “consume” intercepts

(Cleaner: Cypress forgets the intercept after one match)

This is the missing tool many engineers don’t realize exists.

cy.intercept({ method: 'GET', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('getItems') // trigger request 1 cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.wait('@getItems') cy.intercept({ method: 'GET', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('getItems') // trigger request 2 cy.get('[data-testid=load-more]').click() cy.wait('@getItems')

Why this works:

  • times: 1 means Cypress removes the intercept after a single matching request
  • Re-declaring the intercept creates a fresh listener
  • Each cy.wait('@getItems') now truly waits for the next occurrence

This technique gives you explicit, occurrence-specific intercepts without alias clutter. For tests that must assert network behavior (payloads, headers, error flows), it’s a clean and robust pattern.

Fix #3: Stop waiting for requests altogether

(The best fix. UI > network.)

Here’s the golden rule:

That means the most stable tests assert what the user sees:

  • A loading spinner appears → disappears
  • A button becomes disabled → enabled
  • A success message appears when an action is complete.
  • The newly loaded element is now visible in the DOM.

Example with user-visible cues:

cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('exist') cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('not.exist') cy.get('[data-testid=item-list]') .children() .should('have.length.at.least', 1)

No reliance on internal network timing. No alias lifecycle. Zero flake.

Accessibility makes this even more robust

Accessible UI patterns make great Cypress hooks:

aria-busy attribute

<ul data-testid="item-list" aria-busy="true">

Test:

cy.get('[data-testid=item-list]').should('have.attr', 'aria-busy', 'false')

role="status" with live regions

<div role="status" aria-live="polite" data-testid="status"> Loading… </div>

Test:

cy.get('[data-testid=status]').should('contain', 'Loaded 10 items')

Disabled states for actions

cy.get('[data-testid=submit]').should('be.disabled') cy.get('[data-testid=submit]').should('not.be.disabled')

These patterns aid screen reader users and produce stable, deterministic E2E tests.

When waiting for requests is appropriate

There ARE valid scenarios:

  • Asserting payloads or query params
  • Mocking backend responses
  • Validating request ordering
  • Verifying retry logic
  • Testing error handling flows

For those cases: Combine times: 1 with explicit, fresh intercepts defined right before triggers.

For other cases: the test should rely on the UI state.

A combined real-world example

(Network + UI, the best of both worlds)

// UI-driven loading signal cy.get('[data-testid=create]').click() cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('exist') // Network contract check cy.intercept({ method: 'POST', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('postItem') cy.get('[data-testid=create]').click() cy.wait('@postItem') .its('request.body') .should('deep.include', { title: 'New item' }) // Final user-visible assertion cy.get('[data-testid=status]').should('contain', 'Item created')

The network part is accurate. The UI part is resilient. The test is rock-solid.

Final checklist

For accessible, deterministic, non-flaky Cypress tests

  • Prefer user-visible UI state, not network events
  • Use aria-busy, role="status", aria-live, and disabled states
  • When waiting for requests:
  • Re-intercept before each occurrence, OR
  • Use times: 1 to auto-expire the intercept
  • Avoid global, long-lived intercepts
  • Never assume cy.wait('@alias') waits “for the next request”
  • Make loading and completion states accessible (good for tests, good for users)

\

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The Truth Machine: Why SMX Is Becoming the Most Watched Microcap of 2025

The Truth Machine: Why SMX Is Becoming the Most Watched Microcap of 2025

Every industry eventually hits the moment where the narrative collapses under its own weight. Plastic recycling just hit that wall. Too many promises, not enough
Paylaş
Techbullion2025/12/16 03:39
XRP crypto price Analysis: 1D Bearish, Exhaustion Rising

XRP crypto price Analysis: 1D Bearish, Exhaustion Rising

The post XRP crypto price Analysis: 1D Bearish, Exhaustion Rising appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The market is grinding lower under seller control, and even
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 03:40