A new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United StatesA new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United States

Gnosis Co-Founder Warns Clarity Act Favors Big Finance

2026/03/16 17:51
Okuma süresi: 3 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

A new debate is growing around the Digital Asset Market Structure CLARITY Act. It’s a proposed law that aims to regulate the crypto industry in the United States. While the bill tries to bring clear rules to digital assets. Some experts believe it could also change how the crypto ecosystem works.

One of those critics is Dr. Friederike Ernst, co-founder of the Gnosis blockchain protocol. In a recent interview with CoinTelegraph, Ernst said the bill could shift control of crypto toward large financial institutions. She warned that the structure of the bill may push more crypto activity. Through banks and other big financial players. If that happens, the open and decentralized nature of blockchain networks could slowly weaken.

The CLARITY Act Tries to Define Crypto Rules

The CLARITY Act was introduced in 2025. Its main goal is to create clearer rules for digital assets. For years, crypto companies in the U.S. have faced confusion about regulation. Many projects are unsure whether their tokens should be treated as securities or commodities.

The proposed law tries to solve that problem. It would divide oversight between two regulators. The SEC would oversee tokens that qualify as securities. Meanwhile, the CFTC would regulate tokens. That functions more like a commodity. Supporters say this approach could remove uncertainty. This will help the crypto market grow under clear legal guidelines.

Critics Say the Bill May Favor Large Institutions

Despite these goals, Dr. Friederike Ernst believes the bill could have unintended effects. She explained that the proposal assumes most crypto activity should pass through intermediaries. Such as exchanges, financial companies or other regulated institutions. If that structure becomes the norm, large financial firms could gain much more influence over the industry.

Gnosis co-founder warned that power could become concentrated in the hands of only a few big players. This would look very similar to the traditional financial system. For many people in the crypto community, that idea goes against the original purpose of blockchain technology.

Blockchain Was Built Around User Ownership

Dr. Friederike Ernst also highlighted what she believes is the true breakthrough of blockchain networks. In many crypto systems, users are not just customers. They can also become owners and participants in the network. People can hold tokens, vote on governance decisions and help support the ecosystem. 

This structure allows communities to shape how a network grows. But Gnosis co-founder said forcing activity through financial institutions could slowly change that model. Instead of acting as stakeholders, users may end up behaving more like regular customers again.

The Debate Over Crypto’s Future

The discussion around the CLARITY Act shows a larger debate inside the crypto industry. Some experts believe stronger regulation is necessary for long term growth. Clear rules could encourage institutional investment and improve market stability. Others worry that too much regulation could undermine the principles. 

That made crypto unique in the first place. For now, lawmakers continue to discuss the bill as the industry watches closely. Whether the CLARITY Act strengthens the crypto ecosystem or reshapes it toward traditional finance remains an open question.

The post Gnosis Co-Founder Warns Clarity Act Favors Big Finance appeared first on Coinfomania.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Paylaş
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26