Introduction The world of prediction markets is evolving, with Polymarket and Kalshi leading the charge in offering users the ability to bet on real-world events. Polymarket is a decentralizedIntroduction The world of prediction markets is evolving, with Polymarket and Kalshi leading the charge in offering users the ability to bet on real-world events. Polymarket is a decentralized
新手學院/區塊鏈百科/熱門概念/Polymarket vs. Kalshi: Decentralized vs. Regulated Prediction Markets

Polymarket vs. Kalshi: Decentralized vs. Regulated Prediction Markets

初階
Sep 21, 2026Emma Williams
5 分鐘
分享

Introduction


The world of prediction markets is evolving, with Polymarket and Kalshi leading the charge in offering users the ability to bet on real-world events. Polymarket is a decentralized prediction market that uses USDC for transactions and blockchain technology to enable peer-to-peer betting on various outcomes. Kalshi, however, operates as a regulated U.S. market offering event contracts under the oversight of the CFTC. This article compares these two platforms by looking at key aspects such as liquidity, fees, regulatory compliance, and their unique features in the context of the US regulated rollout and the growing role of crypto in prediction markets.


TL;DR


  • Polymarket is a decentralized crypto platform using USDC, while Kalshi is a regulated U.S. market under CFTC oversight.
  • Polymarket benefits from global liquidity, whereas Kalshi draws liquidity from institutional players.
  • USDC is used on Polymarket, while Kalshi uses USD for its event contracts.
  • Polymarket vs Kalshi fees comparison shows that Polymarket generally charges lower fees.
  • CFTC event contract insider trading rules apply to Kalshi’s event contracts.

Polymarket - The Crypto-Based Prediction Market


Polymarket is a crypto prediction market that allows users to bet on real-world events using USDC, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar. The platform operates on blockchain technology, enabling peer-to-peer betting and removing intermediaries, reducing transaction costs. The use of USDC for transactions offers users a stable and widely accessible payment method, particularly appealing to the crypto community.

A key advantage of Polymarket is its decentralized nature, which allows for more flexibility and global participation without the geographic limitations that traditional financial markets impose. The platform covers a variety of events, from politics to finance and entertainment.
Polymarket also benefits from higher liquidity due to its global user base. As a crypto-based platform, it attracts diverse participants, ensuring deeper liquidity for users. However, the decentralized nature may face regulatory scrutiny in jurisdictions like the U.S., where the regulatory environment for such markets is still developing.

Kalshi - The U.S. Regulated Platform


Unlike Polymarket, Kalshi is a regulated prediction market, overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This regulatory framework ensures compliance with U.S. financial laws, offering a sense of trust and security for users seeking a more structured, regulated environment. The CFTC governs the event contracts traded on Kalshi, ensuring the platform’s compliance with financial regulations.

Kalshi’s event contracts cover various outcomes, from U.S. elections to financial market shifts. Unlike Polymarket, which uses USDC, Kalshi operates with USD, making it easier for U.S. traders to participate. These contracts allow users to predict specific outcomes by buying and selling positions in the event contracts.
Another advantage of Kalshi is its institutional liquidity. By collaborating with market makers and liquidity providers, Kalshi ensures deep and stable liquidity in its markets. The platform’s compliance with CFTC regulations, including insider trading rules, further enhances its appeal to institutional investors.

Liquidity Comparison – Kalshi vs Polymarket


The liquidity of Polymarket and Kalshi differs primarily due to their underlying structures. Polymarket, being a crypto-based platform, benefits from a global user base, leading to higher liquidity and a continuous flow of trades. The borderless nature of Polymarket enables it to attract diverse participants, including individual traders and institutional investors.
On the other hand, Kalshi’s liquidity is driven largely by institutional traders and market makers. Kalshi's regulated structure limits its market to mostly U.S.-based participants and institutional players, creating a more structured environment but potentially restricting liquidity in smaller markets. Kalshi’s market depth is critical for maintaining smooth trading, while Polymarket benefits from its decentralized global reach.
Both platforms ensure a smooth experience for users, offering sufficient liquidity for a wide range of trades.
To learn more about Polymarket vs CEX explore Polymarket vs. MEXC Prediction Market: Why Trade on a CEX?.

Fees Comparison – Polymarket vs Kalshi


The fees on each platform play a crucial role in users’ decision-making processes. Below is a comparison of the fees on Polymarket and Kalshi.
As shown in the table, Polymarket offers lower fees due to its decentralized nature, while Kalshi tends to have higher fees, largely due to its regulatory compliance. Kalshi’s operational costs are higher because it needs to meet CFTC requirements, which influences its fee structure.

FAQ Section


What is the key difference between Polymarket and Kalshi?

Polymarket is a decentralized crypto platform using USDC, while Kalshi is a regulated U.S. market compliant with CFTC regulations.

Which platform offers better liquidity?

Polymarket has higher liquidity due to its crypto base and global users, while Kalshi’s liquidity comes from institutional players.

Kalshi is fully regulated by the CFTC, making it a legitimate platform for political and event-based predictions in the U.S.

How do the fees compare between Polymarket and Kalshi?

Polymarket generally has lower fees due to its decentralized nature, while Kalshi has higher fees due to its regulatory compliance.

Is USDC used on both platforms for trading?

No, Polymarket uses USDC, a stablecoin, for its transactions, whereas Kalshi deals in USD for event contracts.

Conclusion


The choice between Polymarket and Kalshi depends largely on whether users prefer a decentralized crypto platform or a regulated U.S. market. Polymarket offers flexibility and lower fees, making it ideal for the crypto community. Meanwhile, Kalshi provides a more secure and regulated environment, which is better suited for institutional players and those seeking a compliant trading platform. As regulated prediction markets grow, Polymarket’s crypto flexibility and Kalshi’s regulatory oversight will continue to shape the future of prediction markets.


Disclaimer


The content in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Trading cryptocurrencies and prediction markets involves significant risk, and users should do their own research and consider their risk tolerance before engaging in trading activities. Neither MEXC nor the author are responsible for any losses incurred while using these platforms. Always seek professional guidance and conduct your own due diligence before making financial decisions.
市場機遇
 圖標
實時價格 ()
--
----
USD
() 實時價格圖表

熱門文章

查看更多
股票永續合約能交易多少檔股票?MEXC 股票合約涵蓋範圍一次看懂

股票永續合約能交易多少檔股票?MEXC 股票合約涵蓋範圍一次看懂

股票永續合約讓您以加密貨幣作為保證金,24/7 全天候交易美股價格,無需開立券商帳戶。 多數介紹文章講到這裡就結束了。 本文則會進一步告訴您:MEXC 上架的股票永續合約數量(附統計日期)、一份 300 檔規模的清單實際包含哪些標的、新標的上架速度有多快,以及獨立第三方數據如何評價其交易品質。 Key Takeaways 股票永續合約追蹤上市股票的價格且沒有到期日,以 USDT 或 USDC 作為

Arc 主網是什麼?上線日期、驗證者與首波上線功能

Arc 主網是什麼?上線日期、驗證者與首波上線功能

由 Circle 開發的 Arc,其公開主網預計於 2026 年 9 月 16 日上線。 Arc 是一條開放、EVM 相容的 Layer 1 區塊鏈,以 USDC 支付 Gas 費(鏈上手續費),專為穩定幣支付、外匯與代幣化資產而設計。 Arc 將由 Arc Network Services LLC 推出,並由許可制的驗證者集合負責維護網路安全;在 Circle 公布的 11 家創始驗證者機構中,

什麼是USBDC?美國銀行在Stellar上測試自家穩定幣

什麼是USBDC?美國銀行在Stellar上測試自家穩定幣

美國最大商業銀行之一已將其自家以美元為錨定的穩定幣在公共區塊鏈上進行轉移。 2026年9月9日,U.S. Bank宣布成功執行了一項使用USBDC的實時試點,這是其專有的以美元為錨定的穩定幣。該交易透過Stellar區塊鏈在U.S. Bank位於北美和歐洲的實體之間轉移價值,同時與銀行現有的財務、風險、合規和營運系統保持連接。 正是這種組合使該實驗備受關注。 USBDC並非運行在僅限銀行使用的私有

穩定幣 vs 代幣化存款:哪一種可能驅動支付的未來?

穩定幣 vs 代幣化存款:哪一種可能驅動支付的未來?

兩種版本的貨幣正在競爭上鏈。 其中一種來自幣種。 另一種則來自銀行。 USDT 和 USDC 等穩定幣已經證明,以美元計價的價值可以透過區塊鏈網路全天 24 小時在全球流轉。 銀行正在開發另一種模式:代幣化存款。 銀行不是創建一個由儲備資產支撐的獨立數位代幣,而是在可程式化基礎設施上呈現既有的存款餘額。 國際清算銀行如今在這場辯論中表明了明確立場。 在 8 月 28 日的傑克遜霍爾經濟研討會上,B

熱門加密動態

查看更多
Securitize 代幣化美股全解析:買到的真是蘋果、英偉達真實股票嗎?

Securitize 代幣化美股全解析:買到的真是蘋果、英偉達真實股票嗎?

概述 Securitize 在 10 月 8 日正式上線 Securitize Stocks,把蘋果、微軟、英偉達等美股搬到鏈上交易。據 Crypto Briefing 的報道,首批代幣以 Convertible Entitlement Token 的形式發行,每一枚由存放在 Securitize 旗下持牌券商處的一股真實股票 1:1 支持,交易運行在 Solana 上,以 USDC 結算。 市場

深度解讀 2026 美聯儲穩定幣監管提案:GENIUS法案如何重塑USDT與USDC格局?

深度解讀 2026 美聯儲穩定幣監管提案:GENIUS法案如何重塑USDT與USDC格局?

概述 美聯儲理事會 9 月 24 日就兩份《GENIUS 法案》實施規則公開徵求意見,穩定幣行業等待了一年多的聯邦審慎框架終於有了具體條文。根據美聯儲的官方公告,第一份提案要求受理事會監管的支付型穩定幣發行方以短期國庫券等合格儲備資產對代幣進行足額支持,並建立標準化資本要求、風險管理標準以及儲備資產保管規則;第二份提案則爲受理事會監管的銀行申請發行支付型穩定幣設立了專門的審批流程。規則文本已於 9

Coinbase股價爲何大幅上漲?比特幣突破與SEC監管新規推動COIN大漲

Coinbase股價爲何大幅上漲?比特幣突破與SEC監管新規推動COIN大漲

概述 美國最大的合規加密資產交易平臺Coinbase(納斯達克代碼:COIN)在近期交易中迎來了強勁的量價齊升走勢,股價單日大漲約 10%,領跑美股金融科技板塊。這輪上漲並非僅僅跟隨比特幣(BTC)突破 69,000 美元的現貨行情,而是受到了行業基本面與監管環境雙重實質利好的共振驅動。美國證券交易委員會(SEC)本週正式提出針對數字資產的全新監管框架草案,其中包含了備受市場期待的代幣發行豁免條款

Circle 財報後的 USDC 增長邏輯:流通量增 19%,爲什麼收入只增 7%?

Circle 財報後的 USDC 增長邏輯:流通量增 19%,爲什麼收入只增 7%?

概述 一枚穩定幣的流通量增長 19%,鏈上交易量增長 151%,而發行方的收入只增長 7%。這三個數字來自同一份財報,它們之間的落差就是當前穩定幣商業模式最值得研究的地方。 根據 Circle 2026 年第二季度業績公告,季末流通中的 USDC 爲 733 億美元,同比增長 19%,季度鏈上交易量 14.8 萬億美元,同比增長 151%,而總收入及儲備收入爲 7.01 億美元,同比增長 7%。儲

熱門新聞

查看更多
MEXC 鏈上每日報告:Circle 在 Solana 上鑄造 5 億枚 USDC

MEXC 鏈上每日報告:Circle 在 Solana 上鑄造 5 億枚 USDC

穩定幣基礎設施與代幣化金融持續在全球擴張,主要支付網絡、銀行及區塊鏈機構加速推進傳統金融與鏈上結算系統之間的整合。與此同時,AI 驅動的金融自動化、合規數字支付框架以及機構級代幣化資產產品持續獲得動能,凸顯了加密基礎設施、AI 與受監管金融市場之間融合趨勢的持續深化。

Bitget 將退出日本:日本居民服務將於 2026 年 12 月 31 日終止

Bitget 將退出日本:日本居民服務將於 2026 年 12 月 31 日終止

Bitget 將於 2026 年 12 月 31 日終止對日本用戶的服務。受影響的用戶必須在截止日期前平倉並提取資產。

Mastercard 完成對 BVNK 的收購,金額高達 18 億美元——穩定幣進入全球支付核心

Mastercard 完成對 BVNK 的收購,金額高達 18 億美元——穩定幣進入全球支付核心

Mastercard 於三月宣布該交易後,已於 2026 年 8 月 3 日(UTC +8)完成對穩定幣基礎設施供應商 BVNK 的收購。

去中心化交易所與中心化交易所現貨交易量比率達24%,中心化交易所活動走弱

去中心化交易所與中心化交易所現貨交易量比率達24%,中心化交易所活動走弱

根據 The Block 目前的數據系列,2026 年 7 月去中心化交易所現貨交易量與中心化交易所現貨交易量的比率達到 24.14%。該數字並不意味著 DEX 控制了合併現貨市場的 24.14%:這意味著 DEX 交易量相當於數據集中包含的 CEX 交易量的 24.14%。同時,DEX 現貨交易量月減約 26%,降至約 1307.7 億美元,創下近兩年來的最低水準。

相關文章

查看更多
快速讀懂比特幣爆倉/清算地圖(Liquidation Map)並應用於交易策略

快速讀懂比特幣爆倉/清算地圖(Liquidation Map)並應用於交易策略

使用槓桿交易比特幣有機會帶來利潤,但也伴隨著嚴重風險。 一個錯誤的決策,您的倉位就會被清算,資金便在幾秒鐘內化為烏有。 比特幣清算地圖(BTC/USDT Liquidation Map)能準確顯示這些危險價格區間在圖表上的位置。 本文會教您如何閱讀這些地圖、識別高風險區域,並利用這些資訊做出更好的交易決策,避免陷入清算連鎖反應。 關鍵要點 比特幣清算地圖能視覺化呈現槓桿交易者面臨「強制平倉」的價格

什麼是穩定幣?穩定加密貨幣的完整初學者指南

什麼是穩定幣?穩定加密貨幣的完整初學者指南

你是否對穩定幣感到好奇,但又覺得加密貨幣的概念讓人困惑?你並不孤單。數字貨幣的世界可能很複雜,特別是對於新手來說。這本綜合指南會用清晰、簡單的術語分解你需要知道的有關穩定幣的所有資訊。從理解穩定幣是什麼、如何運作,到了解不同類型的穩定幣及如何安全使用它們,我們將提供完整的資訊。無論你是想要保護資產免受市場波動影響、進行國際匯款,或僅僅是想擴展對數字貨幣的認識,這本指南都能為你提供必要的信息,讓你自

XRP 會銷毀代幣嗎?會,但原因和你想的不一樣

XRP 會銷毀代幣嗎?會,但原因和你想的不一樣

如果你手上持有 XRP,或正考慮買進,大概都看過網路上關於「XRP 銷毀」的爭論,也好奇這件事到底在吵什麼。簡短的答案是:沒錯,XRP 確實會銷毀代幣——每筆交易都會銷毀極少量——但原因和多數人以為的並不一樣。 本文將說明 XRP 銷毀機制實際上如何運作、什麼時候銷毀多少、為什麼銷毀速度會逐年劇烈波動,以及這些數字是否該納入你對 XRP 的價值判斷。沒有術語堆砌,也沒有炒作——只有機制本身、附上日

XRP 會漲嗎?沒有人願意告訴你的誠實答案

XRP 會漲嗎?沒有人願意告訴你的誠實答案

幾乎每一位 XRP 持有者,遲早都會在搜尋列裡打下同一個問題:XRP 會漲嗎? 而這個問題誠實的難處在於——任何人只要用一句肯定的「會」加上一個保證的目標價來回答你,他賣給你的其實是一種並不存在的確定性。 真正存在的,是一份決定 XRP 走向的簡短清單,而且這些力量並不會月月改變。 本文將說明這些力量、你該如何自行判讀,以及歷史上 XRP 在大跌之後的復甦究竟是什麼樣子。 剛接觸 XRP?建議先從

註冊MEXC帳號
註冊 & 獲得高達10,000 USDT獎金

加入 MEXC 社群

透過我們的官方 Telegram 頻道,即時獲取最新上幣、活動和動態。

25k+ 位成員

合約

BTC/USDT
ETH/USDT
GOLD(XAU)/USDT