NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#creditratingagency–KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to seven classes of debt issued by VCP RRL ABS V, LLC (VCP V), a securitization backedNEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#creditratingagency–KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to seven classes of debt issued by VCP RRL ABS V, LLC (VCP V), a securitization backed

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to VCP RRL ABS V, LLC

2026/02/13 23:31
Okuma süresi: 4 dk

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#creditratingagency–KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to seven classes of debt issued by VCP RRL ABS V, LLC (VCP V), a securitization backed by a portfolio of recurring revenue and middle market corporate loans.

VCP V is an approximate $517.2 million securitization managed by Vista Credit Strategic Lending Corp. (“VCSLC” or the “Collateral Manager”), an investment adviser and affiliate of Vista Equity Partners (collectively, with these affiliates and other funds managed by them and their affiliates “Vista”).

The securitization consists of $80.0 million Class A-L Loans, $7.0 million Class A-1 Notes, $179.35 million Class A-2 Notes, $75.0 million initially unfunded Class A-VF Notes, $25.0 million Class B-1 Notes, $21.54 million Class B-2 Notes, $36.2 million Class C Notes, and $93.1 million of Subordinated Notes of which $76.63 million will be funded at close (collectively the “Debt”). The closing portfolio will consist of $425.7 million of collateral obligations and the Class A-VF Notes as well as remaining $16.5 million of equity will be drawn upon to fund additional collateral purchases up to the fully-ramped portfolio target of $517.2 million.

The Debt is expected to receive payments from a portfolio of recurring revenue loans (“RRLs”) and middle market loans(“MMLs”), including Specified Recurring Revenue Loans (“SRRLs”). The transaction features a two-year reinvestment period which may be extended by an additional year pursuant to satisfaction of the Specified Rating Agency Condition. The ratings reflect initial credit enhancement levels, excess spread, and structural features.

This is Vista’s fifth securitization collateralized predominately by RRL and MML. The RRL strategy focuses on first-lien senior loans to technology and software companies that have a minimum level of recurring revenue and low loan-to-value (LTV) ratios.

The Class A, B, and C Notes have maximum advance rates of 66.0%, 75.0%, and 82.0%, respectively. The overall KWARF of the portfolio is 3381, which represents a weighted average portfolio assessment below B-.

KBRA’s ratings on the Class A-L Loans, Class A-1 Notes, Class A-2 Notes, Class A-VF Notes, Class B-1 Notes, and Class B-2 Notes consider timely payment of interest and ultimate payment of principal by the applicable stated maturity date. KBRA’s rating on the Class C Notes considers the ultimate payment of interest and principal by the applicable stated maturity date.

To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.

Click here to view the report.

Methodologies

  • Structured Credit: Structured Credit Global Rating Methodology
  • Structured Finance: Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology
  • ESG Global Rating Methodology

Disclosures

Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above.

A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here.

Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here.

Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at www.kbra.com.

About KBRA

Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S.

Doc ID: 1013409

Contacts

Analytical Contacts

Jeff Berkes, Senior Director (Lead Analyst)
+1 646-731-1209
[email protected]

Akiko Kato, Director
+1 646-731-1341
[email protected]

Sean Malone, Senior Managing Director, Co-Head of Global Structured Credit (Rating Committee Chair)
+1 646-731-2436
[email protected]

Business Development Contact

Jason Lilien, Senior Managing Director
+1 646-731-2442
[email protected]

Piyasa Fırsatı
Ethervista Logosu
Ethervista Fiyatı(VISTA)
$2.002
$2.002$2.002
+1.06%
USD
Ethervista (VISTA) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28