The post ENA Technical Analysis Feb 14 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ENA is trading under downtrend pressure at the current $0.12 level; the short-term recoveryThe post ENA Technical Analysis Feb 14 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ENA is trading under downtrend pressure at the current $0.12 level; the short-term recovery

ENA Technical Analysis Feb 14

2026/02/14 15:40
Okuma süresi: 4 dk

ENA is trading under downtrend pressure at the current $0.12 level; the short-term recovery (+5.53%) may be misleading as RSI 33.87 is near the oversold region but the overall trend is weak. Investors should closely monitor the $0.1207 support and BTC correlation before volatility increases, and implement stop loss strategies focused on capital protection.

Market Volatility and Risk Environment

ENA’s current price is at the $0.12 level, showing narrow volatility in the $0.11-$0.12 range with a 5.53% rise over the last 24 hours. Although daily volume is at a moderate $106.43M, the overall trend continues as a downtrend. RSI at 33.87 appears to be approaching the oversold region, which carries short-term rebound potential, but the Supertrend gives a bearish signal and it has failed to stay above EMA20 ($0.14). Due to the high volatility nature of the crypto market, this narrow range is prone to sudden expansions; especially in a BTC downtrend, risk increases for altcoins. In MTF analysis, 10 strong levels have been identified across 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 3 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 2 supports on 3D, 2 supports/3 resistances on 1W. This structure can lead to rapid losses during volatility spikes. Investors should adjust their positions based on ATR-based volatility measurement (e.g., assuming ~8-10% ATR over the last 14 days); low volatility periods invite false breakouts. For capital protection, long positions in a downtrend carry high risk – avoid aggressive entries without a trend break despite oversold RSI.

Risk/Reward Ratio Assessment

Potential Reward: Target Levels

In a bullish scenario, the $0.1994 target (score:50) offers ~66% upside potential from the current price. This level is near weekly resistances and can be triggered by a breakout above EMA20. However, BTC stability is required for this reward to materialize; resistances at $0.1294 (73 score) and $0.1223 (64 score) are the first hurdles. For a realistic RR, the reward must be at least 2-3 times the risk – the current structure does not support this.

Potential Risk: Stop Levels

Bearish target $0.0288 (score:22) carries ~76% downside risk from current levels; this can occur quickly if the downtrend continues. Main risk levels: supports at $0.1207 (64 score), $0.0997 (63), $0.1083 (60). Breaking these levels strengthens bearish momentum in MTF and accelerates capital loss. The current risk/reward ratio is ~1:0.87 (risk > reward), making longs unattractive – in short scenarios, reward may dominate. Always calculate both scenarios: low probability of reward inflates risk.

Stop Loss Placement Strategies

Stop loss is the cornerstone of capital protection; structure-based placement is recommended for ENA. For longs, place stop below $0.1207 (e.g., $0.1195, with 1-2% buffer) – this is a strong support (64 score). ATR-based strategy: Calculate daily ATR (approx. $0.01) and place stop 1-1.5 ATR below to avoid whipsaws. For shorts, invalidation above $0.1294 ($0.1305). Structural approach: Base on recent swing lows/highs, integrate MTF supports (prioritize 1W supports). Lock in profits with trailing stop: As price moves toward target, trail stop to EMA20. Common mistake: Placing stop too tight (falls to volatility) or not placing one at all. Educational example: With 1% risk rule, max $100 risk on $10K account – if distance is $0.005, position size is $20K (calculate!). Adapt these strategies to ENA Spot Analysis and ENA Futures Analysis.

Position Sizing Considerations

Position sizing is the heart of risk management – never fixed amount, but dynamic based on account risk. Use Kelly Criterion or fixed fractional (1-2% risk/trade): In ENA example, if stop distance $0.12-$0.1207=0.0023, Size = (Account x %Risk) / Distance for 1% risk. If volatility is high (due to BTC effect), reduce size. Diversification: Max 5-10% capital per coin. Psychological factor: Avoid oversizing due to FOMO. For long-term protection, allocate 50% of portfolio to stables. Don’t forget leverage risk in futures – 20% move wipes 5x account. Internalize the concept: Manage risk, chase reward.

Risk Management Outcomes

Downtrend and BTC bearishness are prominent in ENA; RR is imbalanced, volatility low but spike risk high. Key takeaways: Fix stops below $0.1207, limit positions to 1% risk, monitor MTF levels. Even if oversold RSI provides recovery, remain cautious without trend break. Capital protection: Max 1-2% loss per trade, annual drawdown not exceeding 20%. This approach ensures long-term survival.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $68,956 in downtrend (+3.76% daily but Supertrend bearish); altcoins like ENA are 80+% correlated to BTC. If BTC breaks below $68,776 (then $65,415), cascade risk increases for ENA – $0.1207 support tested. If BTC resistances $71,248-$75,119 break, alts get breathing room. Rising dominance crushes alts; integrate BTC levels into ENA stops. Caution: BTC volatility amplifies ENA 2-3x.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ena-technical-analysis-february-14-2026-risk-and-stop-loss

Piyasa Fırsatı
Ethena Logosu
Ethena Fiyatı(ENA)
$0,1222
$0,1222$0,1222
-%0,89
USD
Ethena (ENA) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28