Glassnode and Checkonchain show two selloff waves in realized losses and cohort rotation, matching Bitcoin capitulation, realized price, Bitcoin ETF outflows.Glassnode and Checkonchain show two selloff waves in realized losses and cohort rotation, matching Bitcoin capitulation, realized price, Bitcoin ETF outflows.

Bitcoin holds as on-chain data shows two-wave capitulation

2026/02/16 01:57
Okuma süresi: 3 dk

Short-term holders blinked; ETFs mostly held firm

Bitcoin’s drop toward $60,000 was defined by who sold and who did not. On-chain patterns point to short-term holders absorbing most of the realized pain in the latest leg lower, while long-term profiles and U.S. spot ETF investors largely refrained from wholesale liquidation.

Selling pressure rotated as key levels failed, with newer entrants proving most sensitive to breaks. That cohort’s behavior is consistent with what on-chain cycle studies have shown in past resets: capitulation tends to begin at the edges of the holder spectrum and then tests deeper conviction only if stress persists.

Why it matters now and immediate market impact

Valuation anchors help frame risk. Based on data from Glassnode, the short-term holder cost basis sits near $94,000, with the Active Investors Mean around $86,800 and the True Market Mean about $80,100, while the realized price is closer to $55,600, gaps that leave many recent buyers underwater and sensitive to volatility.

BlockDAG Mainnet Launch and TGE Completion Ignite Final Shot at 300x Potential Beyond Solana and Chainlink

Bitcoin steadies near $70k as funding rates flag shorts

Loss realization underscores who blinked first. As reported by CryptoSlate, short-term holders realized roughly $1.14 billion of losses in a single day around the February downdraft, versus about $225 million for long-term holders, highlighting where the acute capitulation occurred.

ETF positioning affects flows but did not drive a disorderly exit. Holders of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are nursing their largest unrealized drawdowns since launch, near 42%, yet flows indicate resilience; said James Seyffart, ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence: “ETF holders are hanging in there pretty good.”

Scale also matters for context. As per Bitget, seven-day realized losses reached about $2.3 billion as of February 13, placing the episode among the larger capitulation windows of the cycle. That magnitude supports the view of a structural reset without confirming a final washout. Separately, Bitcoin changes hands near $68,900 at the time of this writing, based on data from Nasdaq.

Two-wave Bitcoin capitulation: November 2025 and February 2026

According to Checkonchain, the capitulation unfolded in two waves: first near $80,000 in November 2025 as momentum cracked, then again around $60,000 in February 2026 as seller cohorts rotated and realized losses surged. The sequence helps explain why support fractured in stages rather than collapsing all at once.

As reported by Forklog, some analysts argue a textbook “final capitulation” may still be absent, noting about 38% of circulating supply in unrealized loss and drawing comparisons to stress seen in mid-2021. If such a final flush occurs, it would likely coincide with a sharper, short-lived spike in realized losses and a decisive reset of short-term holder positioning before more durable stabilization can take hold.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and involve risk. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. The publisher is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of reliance on the information contained herein.
Piyasa Fırsatı
Waves Logosu
Waves Fiyatı(WAVES)
$0.5483
$0.5483$0.5483
-3.16%
USD
Waves (WAVES) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28