Tesla stock fell over 2% early Thursday, tracking broader market weakness and reacting to reports that raised questions about the company’s progress in launchingTesla stock fell over 2% early Thursday, tracking broader market weakness and reacting to reports that raised questions about the company’s progress in launching

Why Tesla stock is slipping over 2% on Thursday

2026/02/26 23:47
Okuma süresi: 3 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Tesla stock fell over 2% early Thursday, tracking broader market weakness and reacting to reports that raised questions about the company’s progress in launching fully autonomous robotaxis.

The decline came as the S&P 500 slipped 0.7% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 1.3% as investors were not impressed by Nvidia's latest quarterly earnings.

Why Tesla stock is slipping over 2% on Thursday

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 204 points, or 0.4%.

Shares of Nvidia dropped roughly 5% despite posting fourth-quarter earnings and revenue that exceeded expectations, weighing on the broader technology sector.

Tesla’s losses were tied in part to renewed scrutiny over its robotaxi ambitions, particularly in California, the largest US auto market.

No autonomous miles logged in California

A report by Reuters cited records from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, showing that Tesla logged no miles of autonomous test driving in California in 2025.

While Tesla holds an entry-level permit from the DMV, it has not secured the additional approvals required to operate fully driverless vehicles in the state.

According to a DMV spokesperson cited in the report, Tesla has not applied for further permits.

Under proposed regulations expected to be finalised later this year, Tesla would need to log at least 50,000 miles of autonomous driving on public roads with a safety driver before applying for a permit allowing testing without one.

State records show Tesla has not logged any miles with regulators since 2019 and has documented only 562 miles in total since 2016.

The contrast with Waymo, owned by Alphabet, has drawn attention.

Waymo logged more than 13 million testing miles between 2014 and 2023 and secured seven regulatory approvals before receiving permission to charge passengers for fully driverless rides.

It is currently one of three companies with permits to commercially operate driverless vehicles in California and the only one running a robotaxi fleet on a scale comparable to Tesla’s stated ambitions.

Reports also indicated that although Tesla’s robotaxi rides are cheaper than Waymo’s, they come with longer wait times and largely rely on human drivers.

Limited operations and legal dispute

Tesla currently operates a small pilot robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, where regulatory hurdles are lower than in California.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, Tesla began offering what it described as a “robotaxi” service last July.

However, according to state regulators and Tesla’s disclosures to customers, the service operates as a chauffeur model with human drivers using the company’s Full Self-Driving software, which remains a driver-assistance system rather than a fully autonomous platform.

Earlier this week, Tesla sued California auto authorities over a previous ruling that concluded the company falsely promoted its vehicles as self-driving.

The DMV had argued that in 2022, Tesla marketed its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems in ways that suggested autonomous operation, even though a safety driver was required.

While Tesla has positioned robotaxis and artificial intelligence as central to its long-term strategy, the latest reports underscore the regulatory and operational hurdles that remain.

The post Why Tesla stock is slipping over 2% on Thursday appeared first on Invezz

Piyasa Fırsatı
Notcoin Logosu
Notcoin Fiyatı(NOT)
$0.0003812
$0.0003812$0.0003812
-0.13%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
Bitcoin Cash: price +7% at $647, breakout and key levels (09/18/2025)

Bitcoin Cash: price +7% at $647, breakout and key levels (09/18/2025)

Bitcoin Cash gains 7% and reaches $647, hitting highs not seen since last April: the movement fits into a risk-on climate.
Paylaş
The Cryptonomist2025/09/18 21:47