Oil tankers reroute as Hormuz tensions rise

Strait of Hormuz status: not a full halt; cautious transits

Commercial tanker transits have not fully stopped. According to Baird Maritime, commercial shipping continues through the strait of Hormuz under heightened risk, contradicting viral claims of a wholesale standstill.

Parts of the waterway were briefly restricted for Iranian live-fire drills on February 17, 2026, as reported by The Washington Post. Those measures were temporary, and vessel movements subsequently resumed.

Taken together, current conditions reflect elevated security posture and operational caution rather than a systemic shutdown. Shipowners are adjusting routing and timing decisions in line with evolving risk.

Why it matters: oil tanker traffic, security risk, shipping rerouting

The Strait is a critical chokepoint for seaborne oil flows. Disruptions can add risk premia to freight and insurance, extend voyage durations via detours, and tighten prompt supply if loadings or transits are delayed.

Regional warnings underscore the stakes. “A monumental act of self-harm,” said David Lammy, UK foreign secretary, describing any attempt to close the Strait, as reported by The Guardian.

Even partial slowdowns can reverberate through physical markets and logistics chains. Higher war-risk surcharges and tighter crewing protocols can lift delivered costs and complicate scheduling for import-dependent buyers.

Near term, firms tend to build in buffer time, raise security watch levels, and review routing around known flashpoints. These measures seek to manage risk while maintaining continuity of trade where feasible.

Industry and U.S. maritime advisories have reinforced a caution-first stance. Formal guidance from international bodies and national authorities is summarized below.

At the time of this writing, some market pages indicated delayed quotation data; separately, based on company disclosures, Frontline plc reported unaudited Q4 2025 profit of $227.9 million and declared a $1.03 per-share dividend.

Security advisories and observed traffic patterns

IMO, Bimco, and MARAD guidance for transiting vessels

According to the International Maritime Organization, operators should conduct thorough security risk assessments before transiting heightened-risk waters and ensure protective measures align with prevailing threat levels.

Bimco said some shipowners paused transits amid deteriorating security conditions and emphasized that further escalations could reduce passage numbers if vessels or crews face direct threats.

The U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD) advised U.S.-flagged ships to avoid Iranian territorial waters when transiting the Strait, reflecting a conservative risk posture and emphasizing strict adherence to safety protocols.

Observed tanker behaviors: delays, reversals, partial traffic recovery

As reported by CNBC, several tankers reversed course or delayed transits around recent incidents; Kpler’s data indicated partial recovery in flows after initial caution.

Bloomberg reported a number of oil tankers are avoiding the Strait altogether, with some shipowners reassessing voyages in light of elevated risk.

FAQ about Strait of Hormuz

Did Iran’s military drills temporarily close parts of the Strait, and for how long?

Yes. As reported by The Washington Post, Iran briefly shut parts for live-fire drills on Feb 17, 2026; the restriction was temporary and traffic later resumed.

What guidance have IMO, Bimco, and MARAD issued for ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz?

IMO urged security assessments; Bimco noted some owners paused transits; MARAD advised U.S.-flagged ships to avoid Iranian territorial waters.