Liu, President of the Solana Foundation, posted that gaming on a blockchain is not coming back and declared the sector effectively dead, drawing parallels betweenLiu, President of the Solana Foundation, posted that gaming on a blockchain is not coming back and declared the sector effectively dead, drawing parallels between

Solana Foundation President Said Blockchain Gaming Is Dead Then Added “Head of Gaming” to Her Bio

2026/03/21 18:46
Okuma süresi: 4 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Liu, President of the Solana Foundation, posted that gaming on a blockchain is not coming back and declared the sector effectively dead, drawing parallels between Meta’s failed $80 billion metaverse investment and the collapse of blockchain gaming’s market cap from $35 billion in 2022 to approximately $4.5 billion today.

Shortly after the post circulated, Liu updated her X bio to include the title Head of Gaming at the Solana Foundation.

What She Actually Said and Why

The comments were prompted by reports that Meta is abandoning its metaverse vision after years of losses and minimal adoption. Liu used the parallel to make a broader argument about where blockchain’s value actually lies. Her position is that finance and open financial rails are the strongest use case for the technology, and that attempts to position blockchain as a replacement for the modern internet or existing gaming infrastructure have consistently failed to find genuine product-market fit.

This is not a new position for Liu. In February 2026 she stated she was happy the misadventures around things like gaming in particular are fully dead. The March post was a sharper version of a view she has held and expressed publicly for months. The Meta context gave her a convenient frame to restate it.

The market data she is drawing from is real. Blockchain gaming’s market cap declined approximately 87% from its 2022 peak. Most of the projects that attracted speculative capital during that period either failed, pivoted, or are operating at a fraction of their prior scale. The play-to-earn model that drove the 2021 to 2022 surge produced extractive economies that collapsed once new capital stopped entering. Liu’s read on the structural failure of that model is not controversial within the industry.

The Internal Contradiction

What made the post generate significantly more attention than a straightforward opinion piece was what happened immediately after. Liu added Head of Gaming to her X bio following the declaration that gaming was dead. The Defiant and others in the community interpreted this as deliberate self-aware irony, a signal that Liu herself recognized the tension between her role and her public position.

Solana Foundation Chief Product Officer Vibhu Norby responded with a satirical post that simultaneously poked fun at the statement and noted that approximately 88 live games are actively being built on the Solana network. That number is the most practically relevant counterpoint to Liu’s framing. A network with 88 games in active development is not a dead sector by any operational definition, whatever the market cap trajectory of the broader blockchain gaming category suggests.

World’s Largest Hardware Wallet Maker Is Going Public and Made Important Hire

What Is Actually Still Building

The projects that have survived the collapse of the 2022 model have largely done so by making on-chain elements optional rather than mandatory. Gunzilla Games’ shooter Off the Grid has moved toward a model where blockchain interaction is available but not required for gameplay. Mythical Games continues developing mobile titles for major brands including FIFA and Pudgy Penguins, embedding on-chain elements within familiar gaming formats rather than leading with blockchain as the product.

That shift from mandatory to optional on-chain interaction is the most significant structural evolution in the sector. The projects that insisted on full on-chain economies with token-gated access and play-to-earn mechanics are the ones that failed. The projects treating blockchain as infrastructure rather than the product itself are the ones still operating.

The Actual Debate

Liu’s broader point about finance being blockchain’s strongest use case is well-supported by the data from this week alone. Hyperliquid generating more fee revenue than Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin combined, Amundi launching a tokenized mutual fund, the SEC approving tokenized equity trading on Nasdaq, and stablecoins processing trillions in annual volume all reflect a finance-first blockchain ecosystem that is working at institutional scale.

That success does not require gaming to be dead. It requires an honest assessment of which use cases have found genuine adoption and which ones have not. Liu’s position is that gaming has not and will not. The 88 teams building on Solana would disagree. The bio update suggests even Liu is not entirely sure how seriously to take her own declaration.

The post Solana Foundation President Said Blockchain Gaming Is Dead Then Added “Head of Gaming” to Her Bio appeared first on ETHNews.

Piyasa Fırsatı
BIO Protocol Logosu
BIO Protocol Fiyatı(BIO)
$0.02018
$0.02018$0.02018
+1.56%
USD
BIO Protocol (BIO) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.