India’s cryptocurrency sector has come under renewed regulatory pressure after the country’s Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted coordinated searches across multiple locations in Bengaluru, targeting firms allegedly involved in large-scale cross-border fund transfers using virtual digital assets.
According to officials, the operation led to the freezing of assets worth approximately ₹6 crore, while investigators examine transactions they believe exceed ₹2,500 crore in value. The case has quickly become one of the most closely watched crypto enforcement actions in India this year, raising questions about compliance, cross-border payments, and the role of crypto on-ramp and off-ramp services.
The raids were carried out on June 17 across six separate locations linked to five companies operating in the digital finance and cryptocurrency ecosystem. The firms named in the investigation include Transak, Carretx, Mokshagna Technologies, Buyhatke, and Abhibha.
| Source: The New Indian Times |
These companies are reportedly involved in providing infrastructure that allows users to convert Indian rupees into cryptocurrencies such as USDT, a widely used stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. These conversion systems, often referred to as on-ramp and off-ramp services, act as gateways between traditional financial systems and blockchain-based assets.
Investigators allege that these platforms may have facilitated fund transfers without proper regulatory documentation, enabling money flows that potentially bypass India’s foreign exchange reporting requirements.
The Enforcement Directorate claims that certain transactions processed through these platforms were structured in a way that allowed funds to move across borders without appropriate disclosure under India’s foreign exchange framework.
Officials suggest that some transfers were routed through over-the-counter (OTC) channels and layered corporate structures, potentially including shell entities registered overseas. According to the investigation, these methods may have been used to obscure the origin and destination of funds.
Authorities have described the activity as potential violations under India’s Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and anti-money laundering provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
While the investigation is ongoing, officials have emphasized that the case reflects enforcement of existing laws rather than the introduction of new legal interpretations.
Cryptocurrency trading remains legal in India, following a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2020 that overturned a previous banking restriction imposed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). However, the legal status of crypto does not eliminate compliance obligations for companies operating within the sector.
Exchanges and service providers are required to register with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) and comply with anti-money laundering regulations under PMLA. Additionally, any transaction involving foreign exchange is subject to FEMA compliance requirements.
| Source: Official Page |
India has also introduced one of the strictest tax regimes for digital assets globally. Cryptocurrency profits are taxed at a flat rate of 30 percent, along with a 1 percent Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on each transaction. Losses from one crypto asset cannot be offset against gains from another, further tightening the financial burden on traders.
The Bengaluru raids come amid a broader trend of increasing scrutiny on crypto-related transactions in India. Tax authorities have reportedly issued tens of thousands of notices related to virtual digital asset activity in recent fiscal cycles.
In several cases, traders have faced tax assessments not solely based on profits, but on total transaction volume and wallet activity. This approach has resulted in significant tax liabilities for some individuals, even when reported trading results showed losses.
Officials argue that the approach is necessary to track undeclared income and ensure compliance in a rapidly evolving financial sector where digital transactions leave extensive audit trails.
Crypto exchanges operating in India are also required to share detailed user transaction data with tax authorities, enabling regulators to cross-check filings under Schedule VDA reporting requirements.
One of the central concerns in the current investigation is the use of cryptocurrency infrastructure for cross-border fund transfers.
Authorities allege that certain platforms may have enabled users to move capital internationally without adhering to formal remittance procedures. These concerns are particularly relevant in the context of stablecoins such as USDT, which are widely used for liquidity and cross-border settlements in the crypto ecosystem.
Regulators fear that without proper oversight, such systems could be misused for laundering funds or bypassing capital controls.
The enforcement action also comes at a time when India continues to develop its central bank digital currency, the Digital Rupee, issued by the Reserve Bank of India.
As of mid-2026, the digital rupee remains in a controlled pilot phase. Circulation levels stand at approximately ₹7.71 billion, down from the previous year, while user participation is estimated between 7 million and 10 million individuals through participating banks.
The RBI has focused recent pilot programs on targeted use cases such as subsidy distribution in select regions, including Gujarat, Puducherry, and Chandigarh. Cross-border experiments are also being explored, with early discussions around interoperability with foreign central bank digital currencies for remittance purposes.
Officials have emphasized that the digital rupee is not intended to replace cash or existing payment systems like UPI in the short term, but rather to complement them through phased implementation.
The latest enforcement actions have reignited debate within India’s crypto industry over regulatory clarity and compliance expectations. While companies acknowledge the need for anti-money laundering safeguards, concerns remain about evolving interpretations of financial regulations and the operational burden placed on startups and exchanges.
Some industry observers suggest that tighter enforcement may push companies toward higher compliance standards but could also slow innovation in the digital asset sector.
Others argue that clearer regulatory frameworks are necessary to support sustainable growth while preventing misuse of crypto infrastructure for illicit financial activity.
India’s latest crypto raid in Bengaluru highlights the increasing intersection between digital asset innovation and regulatory enforcement. With billions of rupees under scrutiny and multiple firms under investigation, authorities are signaling a firm stance on cross-border fund flows involving virtual digital assets.
As India continues to balance innovation with financial oversight, the outcome of this investigation could play a key role in shaping the future regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency in the country.
hoka.news – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.
Crypto Market Analyst & Onchain Storyteller
Barland Vex is a veteran crypto writer who treats the chaos of digital markets as his playground. With a sharp instinct for reading Bitcoin's movements, DeFi waves, and the narratives that move millions of dollars in a matter of hours, Vex delivers analysis that's always one step ahead of the market itself.

