The post Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities. National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California. Getty Images Key Facts U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom. Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.” The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it. Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’” Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it… The post Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities. National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California. Getty Images Key Facts U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom. Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.” The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it. Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’” Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it…

Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules

2025/12/11 00:37

Topline

National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities.

National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California.

Getty Images

Key Facts

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.”

The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it.

Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’”

Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it was “a good day for our democracy and the strength of the rule of law.”

Crucial Quote

“The Founders designed our government to be a system of checks and balances,” Breyer wrote in his opinion Wednesday. “Defendants, however, make clear that the only check they want is a blank one.”

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/10/trump-cant-deploy-national-guard-in-los-angeles-judge-rules/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27