The post RVV token steady as on-chain data disputes 5.354B claim appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Did 53.54% of RVV move? Verified data says no A viral claimThe post RVV token steady as on-chain data disputes 5.354B claim appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Did 53.54% of RVV move? Verified data says no A viral claim

RVV token steady as on-chain data disputes 5.354B claim

2026/02/10 10:43
Okuma süresi: 3 dk

Did 53.54% of RVV move? Verified data says no

A viral claim states the Astra project address moved 5.354 billion RVV in four days, equal to 53.54% of supply. Verifiable on-chain evidence does not support that figure.

According to EmberCN, about 860 million RVV (≈8.6% of supply) exited the minting contract and were sold for roughly 10.288 million USDT, with 8.226 million sent to exchanges and 2.041 million retained on-chain.

Based on data from Followin.io, a multi-signature wallet moved 800 million RVV into eight multi-sig wallets pre-listing. Those wallets distributed to new addresses that sold in batches, raising about $9.09 million, with at least $6.18 million consolidated by two addresses.

Why this claim matters for Astra Nova and holders

Inflated figures can misstate treasury exposure, unlock dynamics, and market integrity, creating unnecessary panic. Accurate measurements anchor risk assessments and align with compliance-focused, evidence-led reporting.

As reported by The Block, astra nova attributed the sales to a compromised third-party market maker account and pledged to buy back the affected tokens while offering a 10% bounty contingent on full return.

Astra Nova said, “a third-party market maker account was compromised.”

According to Blockchain.news, sellers converted RVV to USDT and routed sizable portions to centralized exchanges, including Gate and KuCoin, while leaving residual balances in a monitored wallet.

Price action reflected stress. As reported by the same outlet, RVV experienced a sharp decline following the concentrated on-chain sales and exchange deposits.

Concentration of sell pressure from newly funded addresses and rapid routing to exchanges are consistent with short-term liquidity shocks. These signals typically precede increased volatility and wider bid-ask spreads.

How to verify RVV transfers and flows yourself

Analyst-cited wallets, contracts, and transfer paths

Start at the RVV token’s minting contract and recent transfers. Map movements from multi-signature senders to newly created wallets, then trace batch sales and stablecoin conversions over the same time window.

Check for clustering patterns across recipient wallets and time-bound bursts. Cross-reference the amounts and paths summarized above to reconcile totals near the 800–860 million RVV range.

CEX routing noted: Gate and KuCoin deposits

Follow the USDT legs after swap events and identify exchange deposit tags. Verification should focus on routes to Gate and KuCoin that appear in the transaction paths described earlier.

FAQ about RVV token

How much RVV was actually transferred and from which wallets or contracts?

Approximately 800–860 million RVV, from a minting contract outflow and a multi-signature cluster, not 5.354 billion.

What evidence supports the claim that a market maker account was compromised?

Astra Nova’s public statement and a buyback plus 10% bounty offer, contingent on full return, were reported by a major industry publication.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/rvv-token-steady-as-on-chain-data-disputes-5-354b-claim/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Astra Nova Logosu
Astra Nova Fiyatı(RVV)
$0.000295
$0.000295$0.000295
-6.52%
USD
Astra Nova (RVV) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28