The post China turns buyers against Nvidia's H20 chips after US Commerce Secretary remarks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Beijing has moved to curb the sale of Nvidia’s H20 artificial-intelligence chip after senior officials took offense to public remarks by Howard Lutnick, the United States Commerce Secretary.  The effort is aimed at steering major Chinese tech groups away from the H20 chip, a cut-down processor that has become common in local AI projects. People familiar with the matter said three agencies responded after Lutnick’s comments last month.  “We don’t sell them our best stuff, not our second-best stuff, not even our third-best,” Lutnick told CNBC in July.  Two people said some senior leaders in China viewed the remarks as “insulting”, prompting policymakers to look for ways to deter purchases. Hence, several tech groups in China either paused or sharply cut planned H20 chip orders, based on comments by sources aware of the situation.  Nvidia still has appeal in China Following Huang’s warm welcome in China during his last trip, Chinese customers took a lot of interest in the H20 chips. Their interest was strong enough that Nvidia told TSMC to reopen production lines for the H20 chips. Regulators have asked for increased use of chips produced domestically recently, but groups from ByteDance to Alibaba had argued their AI work would suffer without Nvidia hardware, hurting China’s chances in its technology race with the west. Sources close to those companies told the Financial Times that attitudes are now shifting, specifically, for “inference,” the stage when AI systems answer user requests. That change followed broader testing and chip adoption from domestic makers, including Cambricon and Huawei after Washington initially put a ban on the export of the H20 chips. “Lutnick’s speech gives the coalition [of regulators] one more reason to intensify its efforts to push tech firms to use China’s own chips,” said a person close to the policymakers. CAC asked… The post China turns buyers against Nvidia's H20 chips after US Commerce Secretary remarks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Beijing has moved to curb the sale of Nvidia’s H20 artificial-intelligence chip after senior officials took offense to public remarks by Howard Lutnick, the United States Commerce Secretary.  The effort is aimed at steering major Chinese tech groups away from the H20 chip, a cut-down processor that has become common in local AI projects. People familiar with the matter said three agencies responded after Lutnick’s comments last month.  “We don’t sell them our best stuff, not our second-best stuff, not even our third-best,” Lutnick told CNBC in July.  Two people said some senior leaders in China viewed the remarks as “insulting”, prompting policymakers to look for ways to deter purchases. Hence, several tech groups in China either paused or sharply cut planned H20 chip orders, based on comments by sources aware of the situation.  Nvidia still has appeal in China Following Huang’s warm welcome in China during his last trip, Chinese customers took a lot of interest in the H20 chips. Their interest was strong enough that Nvidia told TSMC to reopen production lines for the H20 chips. Regulators have asked for increased use of chips produced domestically recently, but groups from ByteDance to Alibaba had argued their AI work would suffer without Nvidia hardware, hurting China’s chances in its technology race with the west. Sources close to those companies told the Financial Times that attitudes are now shifting, specifically, for “inference,” the stage when AI systems answer user requests. That change followed broader testing and chip adoption from domestic makers, including Cambricon and Huawei after Washington initially put a ban on the export of the H20 chips. “Lutnick’s speech gives the coalition [of regulators] one more reason to intensify its efforts to push tech firms to use China’s own chips,” said a person close to the policymakers. CAC asked…

China turns buyers against Nvidia's H20 chips after US Commerce Secretary remarks

2025/08/21 20:26
Okuma süresi: 4 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Beijing has moved to curb the sale of Nvidia’s H20 artificial-intelligence chip after senior officials took offense to public remarks by Howard Lutnick, the United States Commerce Secretary. 

The effort is aimed at steering major Chinese tech groups away from the H20 chip, a cut-down processor that has become common in local AI projects. People familiar with the matter said three agencies responded after Lutnick’s comments last month. 

“We don’t sell them our best stuff, not our second-best stuff, not even our third-best,” Lutnick told CNBC in July. 

Two people said some senior leaders in China viewed the remarks as “insulting”, prompting policymakers to look for ways to deter purchases. Hence, several tech groups in China either paused or sharply cut planned H20 chip orders, based on comments by sources aware of the situation. 

Nvidia still has appeal in China

Following Huang’s warm welcome in China during his last trip, Chinese customers took a lot of interest in the H20 chips. Their interest was strong enough that Nvidia told TSMC to reopen production lines for the H20 chips.

Regulators have asked for increased use of chips produced domestically recently, but groups from ByteDance to Alibaba had argued their AI work would suffer without Nvidia hardware, hurting China’s chances in its technology race with the west.

Sources close to those companies told the Financial Times that attitudes are now shifting, specifically, for “inference,” the stage when AI systems answer user requests. That change followed broader testing and chip adoption from domestic makers, including Cambricon and Huawei after Washington initially put a ban on the export of the H20 chips.

“Lutnick’s speech gives the coalition [of regulators] one more reason to intensify its efforts to push tech firms to use China’s own chips,” said a person close to the policymakers.

CAC asked companies to abandon Nvidia’s H20 chips following Lutnick’s comments

About 7 days after Lutnick’s remarks, the CAC issued informal “window guidance” to large platforms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, referring to concerns of security. The agency also asked the companies to pause their orders of chips. 

The CAC said in a statement that AI pros from the US revealed that Nvidia’s chips come with a location tracking functionality and could be remotely shut down. However, Nvidia has disputed this claim strongly. 

MIIT also spoke informally with tech executives from China to solidify the stance by CAC, one person said. The NDRC, the state planner leading the drive for independence in technology, then sent out its guidance asking companies to refrain from buying all chips from Nvidia, which included the H20. The NDRC has long been tasked with the promotion of chip independence, along with providing help to domestic companies, including Huawei, to acquire space in the market. 

CAC’s involvement has increased pressure on tech companies to focus on compliance, even though the directions remain sort of informal. If the watchdog issues penalties, it would choke daily operations. 

Despite calls from some in Washington for tighter curbs, Trump has made it clear that he could allow a lesser version of the Nvidia Blackwell chips for exports to China along with the H20 chips. 

Some Chinese firms have delayed H20 orders

Some tech companies in China have delayed H20 orders while they wait to see whether a Blackwell chip specific to China with potentially better performance will be offered, people said. 

Some policymakers from Beijing are also trying to place a ban on chips made in foreign companies altogether for inference, which contributes to most of the demand in AI. However, local supply is limited. Still Beijing is hoping that the upcoming production lines coming next year will ease the shortage.

The foreign ministry of China stated, “As a matter of principle, science, technology, and economic and trade issues should not be politicised, instrumentalised, or weaponised. Containment and suppression will not hold back China’s development.” 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/china-doesnt-want-nvidia-h20-chips-anymore/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Threshold Logosu
Threshold Fiyatı(T)
$0,006307
$0,006307$0,006307
-1,65%
USD
Threshold (T) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Paylaş
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
Shiba Inu Leader Breaks Silence on $2.4M Shibarium Exploit, Confirms Active Recovery

Shiba Inu Leader Breaks Silence on $2.4M Shibarium Exploit, Confirms Active Recovery

The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence.Kusama emphasized that a special ”war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred.”Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as ”utterly preposterous.”The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions.Attack Details and Immediate ResponseAs highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium's bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network's security framework.The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control.The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure.External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to examine the attack and discover vulnerabilities.The project's key concerns are network stability and the protection of user funds, as underlined by the lead developer, Dhairya. The team is working around the clock to restore normal operations.In an effort to recover the funds, Shiba Inu has offered a bounty worth 5 Ether ($23,000) to the hackers. The bounty offer includes a 30-day deadline with decreasing rewards after seven days.Market Impact and Recovery IncentivesThe exploit caused serious volatility in the marketplace of Shiba Inu ecosystem tokens. SHIB dropped about 6% after the news of the attack. However, The token has bounced back and is currently trading at around $0.00001298 at the time of writing.SHIB Price Source CoinMarketCap
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:25
BlackRock and Marvel Studios Acquire Big Stakes in Mutual Capital

BlackRock and Marvel Studios Acquire Big Stakes in Mutual Capital

BlackRock and Marvel Studios acquire major stakes in Mutual Capital, boosting its role as a leader in asset tokenization.]]>
Paylaş
Crypto News Flash2025/09/18 17:10