Democrats on the House Oversight Committee listed five new demands for Attorney General Pam Bondi to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.The panel's Democrats on the House Oversight Committee listed five new demands for Attorney General Pam Bondi to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.The panel's

Pam Bondi hit with firm new Epstein demands after disastrous hearing

2026/03/20 02:22
Okuma süresi: 3 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee listed five new demands for Attorney General Pam Bondi to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The panel's Democratic minority walked out of a closed-door hearing with Bondi on Wednesday, saying she refused to commit to following a subpoena to testify next month. The following day, they sent the attorney general a letter accusing her of breaking and obstructing the law signed by President Donald Trump as part of an ongoing cover-up.

"From the start, DOJ failed to comply with the law," the Oversight Democrats wrote. "DOJ has withheld 3 million pages; redacted or withheld entirely hundreds of thousands of pages based on privileges expressly rejected by Congress in the EFTA; and released thousands of pages with survivors’ names, photos, and personal information visible to the public."

"Every day since these documents were first released, journalists, survivors, and members of the public have identified additional documents DOJ unlawfully redacted or withheld," they added. "Survivors have been forced to comb through the files to ensure their identities or likenesses were not revealed, and while doing so, many have confirmed that their witness interviews are not present in the files. [FBI summaries] have been mysteriously absent, and documents which appear to reflect allegations against co-conspirators are simply missing, while other documents are taken down from the DOJ website without explanation."

Democrats complained that Bondi prohibits lawmakers from seeing unredacted versions of documents or taking notes on their own paper, and they asked for five meaningful changes to the review process that would comply with the law Congress passed overwhelmingly last fall.

"First, provide Members of Congress with access to the full Epstein files," they wrote. "This includes the roughly 3 million files DOJ has withheld as duplicative or otherwise, and those that have not been uploaded to the database."

"Second, ensure that records available to Members of Congress are fully unredacted," they continued. "This will necessitate fulfilling the command in the EFTA to provide all files, including original unredacted copies of documents from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that remain redacted in your database."

"Third, DOJ must provide a reasonable number of computers accessible on Capitol grounds," they demanded. "Members must be able to access these computers without restriction. We can discuss the exact number that will meet our oversight needs."

"Fourth, access must be provided for a select number of congressional staff identified by the Chairman and Ranking Member of the committees of jurisdiction; namely, the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs," the Democrats added.

"Fifth, there can be no monitoring, tracking, or recording of Members’ searches or communications, under any circumstances," their demands concluded. "We are happy to work with DOJ on a process that ensures that only Members and authorized staff have access to the room where the computers are located."

Piyasa Fırsatı
Notcoin Logosu
Notcoin Fiyatı(NOT)
$0.0004006
$0.0004006$0.0004006
0.00%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Paylaş
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

The post XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP Builds Multi-Year Base as Whales Accumulate and Volume
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 00:04