In one of my most elaborate undercover operations for BBC Newsnight, I got my hands on the secret plans for the invasion. Nope, not Trump’s attack on Iran. It wasIn one of my most elaborate undercover operations for BBC Newsnight, I got my hands on the secret plans for the invasion. Nope, not Trump’s attack on Iran. It was

Trump's right about one thing in Iran — and he's going to hate it

2026/03/20 19:50
Okuma süresi: 5 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen [email protected] üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

In one of my most elaborate undercover operations for BBC Newsnight, I got my hands on the secret plans for the invasion. Nope, not Trump’s attack on Iran. It was 2004 when I conned the Heritage Foundation and a James Baker operative into handing over the elaborate 323-page plan to keep the oil flowing from Iraq. The plan was secretly drafted BEFORE George W. Bush invaded.

In 2004, The State Department had told me that no plan existed for handling Iraq’s oil. I didn’t buy it. If we invaded California, we’d certainly have a plan for oranges and action films.

With lots of luck, with lots of bluff and BS, I got my hands on the confidential scheme. Here it was, the smash-and-grab plan for Iraq’s oil written in secret at the direction of oil industry bigshots headed by Baker, Bush Sr’s Secretary of State who, as a lawyer, represented Exxon and the Saudi monarchy.

At the time, when I reported it on BBC, it was a scandal. (Correction: the story was front-page news everywhere BUT the USA where it was buried.)

I’m only bringing up 20-year-old history to tell you that, while Bush’s hidden plan for the oil fields of Iraq evidenced greedy secret scheming to grab Iraq’s oil industry, at least we could say this: EVEN GEORGE BUSH HAD A PLAN.

So no, I have not uncovered Trump’s secret plans for the invasion of Iran, or his plan to protect the world’s oil supply, BECAUSE TRUMP HAS NO PLAN. Even the Wall Street Journal, a loud booster of the attack on Iran, was shocked that our trillion-dollar defense and intelligence apparatus did not seem to know that the choke point at the Strait of Hormuz would seize the world’s economy by the throat.

In fact, before Bush invaded Iraq, he had TWO plans. One was 101 pages long drafted by neo-cons in the Defense Department (with help from the Heritage Foundation) to “privatize” (that is, seize) Iraq’s oil fields. Kudos to the Wall Street Journal for getting that document and sharing it with me.

However, oil companies were furiously opposed to seizing Iraq’s oil, so the oil men drafted a 323-page counter-plan.

And what a plan it was. The State Department and Big Oil were pushing for what they called, “an invasion disguised as a coup,” with one of Saddam Hussein’s generals taking over. The 101st Airborne would be in and out in three days.

In fact, the State Department had a secret hugger-mugger in Walnut Creek, California, where, as OPEC consultant Falah Aljibury told me, he “auditioned” several of Saddam’s generals to act as replacement dictator.

Amazingly, once I got the oil industry plan, I reviewed it with Philip Carroll, the former CEO of Shell Oil USA, who had been appointed, under pressure from the oil industry, by Bush to take charge of Iraq’s oil fields. Carroll slammed the neo-con claim that “privatization [of Iraq’s oil] is a no-brainer.” Carroll said, “it would only be thought about by someone with no brains.”

Why did Shell and Exxon NOT want Iraq’s oil fields? Because, as a Saudi official explained to me, that would kick Iraq out of OPEC and, indeed, the OPEC cartel’s power would be crushed. The Texas oil bosses knew: We don’t want Iraq’s oil, we want Iraq to stay in OPEC to LIMIT Iraq’s production and keep the price of oil at $50+ a barrel.

Oil corporations don’t want oil, they want PROFITS. Keeping most of Iraq’s oil in the ground per direction of OPEC, keeps prices high. Those oil fields today remain, technically, in the hands of Iraqis. Oil companies work by “Production Sharing Agreements” which give Big Oil the profits without the headache of ownership and keeps the OPEC cartel sitting happily on its spigots.

But Iran is different. I can’t find the secret plans for Trump’s attack on Iran because it seems there are none. It seems that “Secretary of War” Pete Hegseth and our massive intelligence agencies haven’t looked at Google Maps. I thought these guys read the Bible, in which Jesus clearly said, “It is as difficult for a rich man to get into heaven as it is to get an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz.” I may not have that quote exactly, but you know what I mean.

Trump is right, that the war is nearly over. Because the Ayatollahs have won. While we can revel in Trump’s nose being rubbed in the vomit of his own self-created defeat, let us not forget that it is the people of Iran who are paying the price of Trump’s hubris, of Netanyahu’s fever dreams of Iranians rising up against their mullah masters.

The Guardian reports that, this year, Iran gunned down over 30,000 of its own citizens, unarmed, nearly ten times the number of Americans killed on September 11, 2001. Now that Trump and Hegseth have discovered the Strait of Hormuz, they must realize they are checkmated. And that they will sell out the Iranian people to the untender mercies of the religious fascists in return for some baloney deal to limit Iran’s nuclear bomb program.

Uncovering Dubya Bush’s plan for Iraq’s oil, the auditions for a new dictator, the oil industry, Saudi and OPEC control over Iraq’s oil output made me sick at heart. But the only thing more evil than a secret plan is to have no plan at all. I am sick when I hear Mr. Chickenhawk “bone spurs” draft dodger Trump tell the Iranians to rise up, unarmed, against the murder-crats.

When Trump does his TACO, as he always does, we will witness the Islamic Revolutionary Guard begin the mass arrests, whippings and executions that are all too predictable. You know and I know that Trump is going to sell them out. All because he had no plan, just a momentary rush from his testosterone and Adderall injections. An empty, bloviating sack of a man, with small hands and a small heart.

Piyasa Fırsatı
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logosu
OFFICIAL TRUMP Fiyatı(TRUMP)
$3.331
$3.331$3.331
-0.06%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Vistra (VST) Stock Drops 7% as Insider Sales Spook the Market

Vistra (VST) Stock Drops 7% as Insider Sales Spook the Market

TLDR Vistra (VST) stock fell as much as 7.16% as investors reacted to heavy insider selling by the CEO and top executives filed with the SEC. The stock also hit
Paylaş
Coincentral2026/03/21 01:25
BlockchainFX or Based Eggman $GGs Presale: Which 2025 Crypto Presale Is Traders’ Top Pick?

BlockchainFX or Based Eggman $GGs Presale: Which 2025 Crypto Presale Is Traders’ Top Pick?

Traders compare Blockchain FX and Based Eggman ($GGs) as token presales compete for attention. Explore which presale crypto stands out in the 2025 crypto presale list and attracts whale capital.
Paylaş
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 00:30