Discover how calm LTH whales and aggressive STH whales shape Bitcoin market dynamics, influencing volatility and long-term stability.]]>Discover how calm LTH whales and aggressive STH whales shape Bitcoin market dynamics, influencing volatility and long-term stability.]]>

Inside Bitcoin Whales: Calm LTH vs Aggressive STH Dynamics

  • LTH whales accumulate steadily and remain calm, providing long-term market stability despite short-term fluctuations.
  • STH whales act aggressively, often repositioning during pullbacks, adding volatility and short-term pressure to Bitcoin markets.

The debate over whale behavior in the Bitcoin market has resurfaced after on-chain analyst Carmelo Aleman on CryptoQuant revealed a striking difference between two large groups: Long-Term Holder (LTH) Whales and Short-Term Holder (STH) Whales.

Both types hold more than 1,000 BTC, but their reactions to the market are strikingly different.

LTH Whales are known to be calm players, unaffected by price fluctuations, especially when declines are still moderate. They are more often associated with strategic accumulation, holding assets for more than 155 days, and tend to suppress selling pressure.

In contrast, STH Whales are aggressive, exploiting corrections to increase holdings while lowering average costs. This pattern does indeed liven up the market, but it also increases short-term volatility.

Calm vs. Aggressive Dynamics in the Bitcoin Market

On-chain data shows a clear difference. Currently, STH whales are recorded at a Realized Price of around $111,299 with holdings of 1.0705 million BTC. This figure indicates that many of them entered the market at a high price level.

In contrast, LTH whales are in a much safer position, with a Realized Price of only $41,887 and holdings of around 3.72 million BTC. This difference in cost basis explains why STH whales are more reactive: they don’t want to bear the brunt of price volatility for too long.

Source: CryptoQuant

Interestingly, STH whales often come from institutions, companies, or new players who enter Bitcoin with high expectations. Once the price corrects, they take aggressive action.

However, every time a wallet holds past 155 days, their status changes to LTH. The problem is, waves of new players continue to arrive, so the aggressive cycle repeats itself, creating almost endless short-term pressure.

On the other hand, the LTH whale pattern actually helps stabilize the market. With a long-term accumulation strategy, the available supply in the market becomes more limited.

We previously highlighted this through the MVRV ratio indicator, which showed the Bitcoin market was in balance: no signs of panic, but also no excessive euphoria. Reduced selling from LTHs also contributed to maintaining strong market conditions.

Market Signals Show Resilience Despite Short-Term Moves

Looking at the latest price movement, BTC is trading at about $114,181. In the last four hours, it has slightly increased by 0.33%, while in 24 hours, it has been almost flat with a correction of 0.02%.

Over the last 7 days, BTC has actually strengthened by 2.04%. These figures further confirm that despite the buying and selling from STHs, the market remains quite resilient.

Furthermore, a long-term perspective is also beginning to emerge. Deutsche Bank estimates that by 2030, Bitcoin could share a place with gold on central bank balance sheets.

However, analysts emphasize that the role of the US dollar will not be replaced. This projection shows that digital assets are gaining increasing recognition in the traditional financial world, although their status is more of a complement, not a replacement.

However, what’s interesting to note is the contrast in behavior between these two whale groups. STH’s aggressive activity often triggers sharp short-term movements, while LTH’s consistent accumulation serves as a price support.

The combination of these two makes the Bitcoin market always dynamic, with its rhythms changing in a matter of days.

]]>
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Paylaş
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Paylaş
PANews2025/09/18 07:00