ASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family ratingASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family rating

Asialink gets issuer ratings with ‘stable’ outlook from S&P, Moody’s

2025/12/23 00:05
Okuma süresi: 6 dk

ASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family rating (CFR) from Moody’s Ratings, with both debt watchers citing the company’s market leadership and strong capital position.

This is the first time that the two debt watchers assigned ratings for the nonbank financial institution. They both gave “stable” outlooks for their respective below investment-grade assessments, which means the ratings are unlikely to change in the near term.

“Our ratings on Asialink reflect our view that the company will maintain its leadership in Philippines’ refinancing and second-hand auto loan segments over the next 12-24 months,” S&P Global said in a statement. “The company has strong capitalization, boosted by a significant equity infusion from its financial sponsor — Creador, a private equity fund.”

In 2024, Creador invested P4 billion into Asialink to help fund its expansion plans.

“AFC’s ‘Ba2’ CFR reflects the company’s strong capitalization and profitability, underpinned by its extensive domestic franchise… AFC is one of the largest non-bank financial institutions in the Philippines, which supports micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) by providing loans backed by collateral (vehicles and real estate), by revenue and number of physical branches. Its strong franchise is evidenced by its branch distribution across the country, extensive collection infrastructure and dealer partnerships, providing it with a competitive business advantage,” Moody’s Ratings said in a separate statement.

S&P Global said Asialink has a niche position in the second-hand car and truck financing market, cornering a 10-15% share.

“The market for financing used vehicles is highly fragmented with numerous small players… Asialink has a competitive advantage over its smaller peers due to its significant scale and branch network. These are important because auto financing in provincial areas requires an on-the-ground presence to be near the customer, to facilitate loans disbursement and collection,” it said.

Moody’s Ratings said the company’s strength lies in its capitalization as its tangible common equity to tangible managed assets (TCE/TMA) grew to 27.4% at the end of last year from 17.6% in 2023.

“Its high capital would provide sufficient buffers against the cyclicality of potential loan losses. We expect its TCE/TMA will remain above 21% in the next two years.”

“We forecast the company will have a risk-adjusted capital ratio of about 19% over the next two years, compared with about 20.4% as of Dec. 31, 2024… Asialink’s modest targeted dividend payout ratios of 20%-30% for 2025-2027 will also support its strong capital position,” S&P Global added.

It projects 25%-28% annual loan growth for this year until 2027, slightly slower than the 2021-2024 compounded annual growth rate of 34%.

S&P Global said “very high margins” on Asialink’s core lending book also support its profitability, with its average loan size, mainly for individuals and small and medium enterprises, at about $8,500 and having effective lending rates of 23%-30% per annum.

“The company’s return on average assets (ROAA) of 5.5% for 2024 compares favorably with the Philippines banking sector average of 1.5%, and the 2.5%-3.0% peer average for finance companies in Southeast Asia… We forecast Asialink’s ROAA will recover to about 6.5% in 2027. The projected profit levels are lower than a recent peak of 7.5% in 2022, reflecting the company’s shift toward secured lending, where yields are lower than for unsecured personal loans. Pre-pandemic, Asialink’s loan portfolio had 30% secured loans and 70% unsecured consumer loans. Today, the portfolio is 95% secured.”

Elevated credit costs seen in 2024 may continue to affect Asialink’s 2025 profit but could ease over the next two years, it added.

“Our base case assumes Asialink’s net interest margin (NIM) will improve to 24%-26% over 2025-2027, compared with 23%-24% in 2022-2024. The company’s loans predominantly have a fixed rate, while its funding costs for bank loans correlate with policy rates. Policy rates in the Philippines peaked at 6.5% in 2024, and have since been cut to 4.75%. We forecast the rates will decline to 4% by 2027, which will support NIM improvement,” S&P Global said.

“Given that its lending rates show low sensitivity to the central bank’s interest rate cuts, AFC’s NIM will benefit from lower funding costs over the next 12-18 months,” Moody’s Ratings added.

ASSET QUALITY
Meanwhile, both credit raters noted that the company faces some asset quality risks due to rapid loan growth and its focus on higher-risk borrower segments like individuals and small business owners

“Management’s steps to tighten underwriting standards, and the company’s strong capitalization and good profitability temper these risks,” S&P Global said. “Asialink’s heavy emphasis on loan collection and collateral recovery helps to control credit risks. The company leverages its extensive physical presence and network of collection agents to collect past-due loans and foreclose the underlying collateral.”

“AFC’s asset quality, while modest, benefits from an effective collateral collection process with borrowers and strong recovery rates. While AFC has a high default rate on its portfolio, in the low double-digit range, the loss given default is substantially reduced by collateral sales. We expect AFC’s asset quality to remain largely stable, with risks arising from its high loan growth and high level of defaults, balanced by its strong ability to collect and sell collateral,” Moody’s Ratings said.

Both debt watchers also flagged concentration risks in Asialink’s funding profile.

“Unlike its regional peers, AFC’s funding sources are not as diversified due to limited access to capital markets, and it has funding concentration to a single domestic bank. Regardless, the company has good access to credit lines, including access to long term funding from global development financial institutions (International Finance Corp. and Asian Development Bank), and its maintenance of P1-1.5 billion minimum cash buffer, helps to mitigate its refinancing risks,” Moody’s Ratings said.

“In our opinion, Asialink’s main funding providers are unlikely to cut or reduce credit lines. However, they could be circumspect in increasing their exposure due to single-borrower limits or concentration considerations. Asialink is seeking new funding lines from local banks, foreign banks, and multilateral agencies to diversify funding and ease concentration risks. It has had early success on this front,” S&P Global added.

It said its “stable” rating outlook shows that it expects the company to keep its market leadership and strong capitalization despite intense competition in the used vehicle financing segment.

S&P Global and Moody’s Ratings both said they could upgrade their ratings if Asialink shows improvements in its funding profile and asset quality, while significant deterioration of both could lead to a downgrade.

Moody’s Ratings added that the strength or weakness of the operating environment for Philippine financing companies could also affect its assessment of the company. — K.K. Chan

Piyasa Fırsatı
STABLE Logosu
STABLE Fiyatı(STABLE)
$0.027681
$0.027681$0.027681
+18.77%
USD
STABLE (STABLE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28