Nasdaq-listed Forward Industries is under pressure as falling crypto prices weigh heavily on digital asset treasury firms. However, company executives say its balanceNasdaq-listed Forward Industries is under pressure as falling crypto prices weigh heavily on digital asset treasury firms. However, company executives say its balance

Forward Industries Faces $1B Unrealized SOL Loss, Targets Rivals

2026/02/08 17:11
Okuma süresi: 3 dk

Nasdaq-listed Forward Industries is under pressure as falling crypto prices weigh heavily on digital asset treasury firms. However, company executives say its balance sheet strength creates rare strategic flexibility. Despite steep losses on paper, Forward maintains the largest publicly traded Solana treasury and holds no corporate debt, a position its leadership views as an advantage rather than a liability.

Forward currently holds nearly seven million SOL tokens, accumulated at an average price near $232. With Solana trading around $85, the company faces an unrealized loss approaching $1 billion. 

Forward Industries Faces $1B Unrealized SOL Loss, Targets Rivals

Consequently, FWDI shares have dropped sharply, sliding from nearly $40 last year to about $5 today. The drawdown reflects broader skepticism toward crypto-heavy balance sheets during prolonged market weakness.

Balance Sheet Strength Shapes Strategy

However, Forward’s chief investment officer Ryan Navi argues the firm’s lack of leverage sets it apart from peers. While several crypto treasury companies have sold assets to manage debt obligations, Forward avoided borrowing entirely. Hence, it now retains flexibility while competitors retrench.

Navi says scale and discipline allow Forward to act when others cannot. Additionally, the firm can selectively deploy leverage later if market conditions improve. That optionality matters as valuations compress across the sector.

Forward’s transformation began in 2025 following a $1.65 billion private investment in public equity. Backed by Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital, the raise repositioned the firm around Solana accumulation. The company now holds more SOL than its next three public rivals combined.

Solana as a Long-Term Bet

Significantly, Forward’s strategy hinges on Solana’s technical profile rather than short-term price action. Navi believes fast settlement, low fees, and network scalability position Solana for consumer and capital markets growth. Moreover, previous spikes in network activity demonstrated its ability to handle massive user demand.

Forward stakes its SOL holdings, earning yields between 6% and 7%. Although issuance declines will reduce returns over time, staking still offsets holding costs. Additionally, Forward partnered with Sanctum to issue a liquid staking token, fwdSOL. That structure enables capital efficiency while maintaining onchain yield.

Using fwdSOL as collateral, Forward can borrow at rates below staking returns on decentralized platforms. Consequently, the firm achieves a lower effective cost of capital than many competitors.

Consolidation and Long-Term Vision

Navi describes Forward as a permanent-capital vehicle rather than a trading operation. The firm plans to expand into tokenized real-world assets and recurring revenue opportunities that exceed its capital costs. Moreover, leadership views current sector stress as a setup for consolidation.

With no debt, large-scale SOL exposure, and backing from major crypto investors, Forward believes it can acquire distressed rivals. Kyle Samani’s decision to accept FWDI equity instead of cash further signals confidence in that long-term vision.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Solana Logosu
Solana Fiyatı(SOL)
$86.12
$86.12$86.12
-1.48%
USD
Solana (SOL) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28