Uniswap unification expands fees, UNI burns across networks

In a pivotal governance phase, Uniswap unification is emerging as the framework for routing protocol revenues and tightening the link between usage and token economics.

New fee plan extends to eight additional networks

On Feb. 19, 2026, the team behind the dominant decentralized exchange Uniswap unveiled a proposal to expand its fee-collection system beyond Ethereum and current coverage. The governance measure seeks community approval to turn on protocol fees for all remaining version 3 liquidity pools on Ethereum, as well as on eight other blockchains.

Specifically, the proposal would activate fees on Arbitrum, Base, Celo, OP Mainnet, Soneium, X Layer, Worldchain, and Zora. Moreover, this change would substantially broaden Uniswap’s revenue footprint across multiple ecosystems that already host high-volume trading activity.

The plan introduces a new tier-based protocol fee adapter that automatically assigns fee rates to each pool. Instead of separate governance votes per pool, rates would be mapped to the existing liquidity provider fee tiers, simplifying operations and reducing governance overhead for token holders.

Layer 2 revenue routed back to Ethereum for UNI burns

Under the proposal, all protocol fees accrued on the eight layer 2 and alternative networks would be bridged back to Ethereum mainnet. There, the funds would be used for automated UNI purchases and permanent removal of those tokens from circulation, tightening the token’s supply over time.

However, the design does more than simply add another burn lever. It formalizes cross chain revenue routing into a unified system, ensuring that value generated on scaling networks ultimately supports Ethereum-based token holders through structured ethereum uni burns.

The mechanism mirrors infrastructure already used for Unichain sequencer revenue, aligning the broader protocol with the same usage-linked burn model. That said, this proposal applies the template to a much wider set of markets and liquidity pools.

UNIfication framework and streamlined governance path

The current measure is the first major test for the UNIfication governance overhaul, which restructured how Uniswap processes fee-related changes. The new model allows certain proposals to skip the traditional request for comment stage and move more quickly through the decision pipeline.

Under this framework, the initiative first goes to a five day Snapshot poll. If it secures sufficient support in that off-chain vote, it then progresses to a binding on-chain ratification, where final approval or rejection is recorded directly on Ethereum.

Within this context, the ongoing unification governance vote on the Uniswap unification framework could set precedent for future monetization changes. Moreover, it may define expectations for how rapidly the community can adapt fee structures as markets evolve.

Implications for Uniswap tokenomics and market position

If adopted, the uniswap fee expansion would significantly increase the share of protocol activity that generates revenue for UNI-linked mechanisms. It would also further entrench a deflationary design where more trading volume and liquidity translate into more UNI removed from circulation.

However, the vote is also a signal on governance appetite for more active monetization, especially across layer 2 fee routing environments. Community support would confirm backing for a model in which cross-network usage flows back to Ethereum and the UNI supply.

Ultimately, the outcome of the current process will reveal how far the community is prepared to push the Uniswap protocol toward coordinated revenues and burns under the evolving UNIfication architecture.

In summary, the proposal combines a broader on-chain fee switch, automated cross-network routing, and a burn-centric incentive design, potentially reshaping both Uniswap’s revenue profile and UNI’s long-term scarcity.