The location data broker X-Mode has agreed not to share sensitive location data as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the company of selling information that potentially revealed people’s visits to medical facilities, houses of worship, and businesses catering to LGTBQ+ communities.The location data broker X-Mode has agreed not to share sensitive location data as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the company of selling information that potentially revealed people’s visits to medical facilities, houses of worship, and businesses catering to LGTBQ+ communities.

An Inside Look at the Settlement Between X-Mode and the FTC

The location data broker X-Mode has agreed not to share sensitive location data as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the company of selling information that potentially revealed people’s visits to medical facilities, houses of worship, and businesses catering to LGTBQ+ communities.

\ The settlement, which was announced this week, also requires X-Mode to honor opt-out requests from consumers and more clearly disclose the collection and use of location data. The FTC had accused X-Mode of collecting identifiers and location data even after users had explicitly opted out.

\ X-Mode was rebranded as Outlogic as part of a 2021 acquisition.

\ The FTC action follows a 2022 Markup story listing 107 third-party apps from which X-Mode was collecting location data, including LGBTQ+ dating apps. The Markup also revealed that X-Mode was one of about a dozen location data companies that purchased precise location data from family tracking app Life360, which limited the sale of such data after our reporting.

\ Prior to that, in 2020, Vice reported that X-Mode was selling location data from Muslim prayer and Muslim dating apps to the U.S. military. Shortly after that report, Apple and Google reportedly banned X-Mode’s software from being used in apps sold on their app stores.

\ X-Mode collects the majority of its location data from mobile apps made by other companies.

\ Under the settlement, which still must be approved by commission members, X-Mode must maintain a list of sensitive locations, which includes medical facilities, religious organizations, correctional facilities or shelters. X-Mode would be banned from selling, licensing, or transferring data about visits to such locations, would have to limit collection of data about such visits, and delete any existing data collected from such locations.

\ The FTC complaint includes an example of how X-Mode sold such information in the past: a purchase order from an X-Mode customer detailing the specifications for data collected from consumers who visited infusion centers and specialized medical offices, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists.

\ Josh Anton, president of Outlogic, told The Markup in an emailed statement, “We disagree with the implications of the FTC press release. After a lengthy investigation, the FTC found no instance of misuse of any data and made no such allegation. Since its inception, X-Mode has imposed strict contractual terms on all data customers prohibiting them from associating its data with sensitive locations such as healthcare facilities. Adherence to the FTC’s newly introduced policy will be ensured by implementing additional technical processes and will not require any significant changes to business or products.”

\ In a statement about the action, FTC Chair Lina Khan said “With this action, the Commission rejects the premise so widespread in the data broker industry that vaguely worded disclosures can give a company free license to use or sell people’s sensitive location data.”

Problematic Business Practices

The FTC complaint said X-Mode lacked control over what its customers did with sensitive location data. “In at least two known instances,” it stated, “X-Mode sold location data to customers who violated contractual restrictions limiting the resale of such data.” Indeed, as previously reported by The Markup, X-Mode in 2021 filed a lawsuit over such a violation. The suit alleged that X-Mode customer Nybsys resold raw location data without permission, including to LocalBlox, a company that X-Mode previously banned from buying its data. The case was dismissed in 2022.

\ The FTC complaint noted that consumers tracked to sensitive locations could face religious discrimination and prejudice due to their visits to women’s reproductive health providers as well as “physical violence, emotional distress, and other harms.”

\ The FTC signaled that the location data industry will continue to be closely monitored. “By securing a first-ever ban on the use and sale of sensitive location data, the FTC is continuing its critical work to protect Americans from intrusive data brokers and unchecked corporate surveillance,” Khan said in a statement.


Credits

  • Jon Keegan, Investigative Data Journalist

Design and Graphics

  • Gabriel Hongsdusit

Engagement

  • Maria Puertas

Editing

  • Ryan Tate
  • Michael Reilly

\ Also published here

\ Photo by GeoJango Maps on Unsplash

\

Piyasa Fırsatı
Mode Network Logosu
Mode Network Fiyatı(MODE)
$0,000431
$0,000431$0,000431
-%0,59
USD
Mode Network (MODE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

UXLINK Approves Token Buyback with 100% Community Support

UXLINK Approves Token Buyback with 100% Community Support

The post UXLINK Approves Token Buyback with 100% Community Support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: UXLINK community approves token buyback with
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/28 06:51
Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
Why We Need More Stablecoins

Why We Need More Stablecoins

The post Why We Need More Stablecoins appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stablecoins are the real success story in crypto. In the past six years, Stablecoins have quietly become indispensable. Since 2019, people have used stablecoins to move $264.5 trillion across 18 billion in transactions. Why? Stablecoins let you hold money onchain without having to worry about volatility, making them the easiest way to store value and transact in the crypto economy. Total market cap of stablecoins is over $280 billion Source: Defillama Why are Stablecoins popular right now? We’re seeing a rush of companies launching stablecoins in the U.S. because issuers finally gained clarity with the passing of the GENIUS Act in July 2025. For the first time, the U.S. government clearly defined who can issue stablecoins, what counts as a “payment stablecoin,” and what obligations issuers have to consumers. Since the GENIUS Act passed, MetaMask rolled out mUSD, Stripe launched a payments-focused chain called Tempo, Circle announced their purpose-built stablecoin payments L1, Arc Network, and there’s been a spree of acquisitions. Stablecoin infrastructure companies like Iron are getting snapped up, and traditional finance firms like Stripe are spending heavily to buy crypto companies (Privy and Bridge) whose products they can fold into their existing offerings. In addition, chains are launching their own stablecoins as a way to capture more revenue from the yield they generate. MegaETH has its native stablecoin, USDm. Hyperliquid launched USDH, which sparked a bidding war with Paxos, Agora, Sky, and Frax all vying to get involved. At this rate, it’s easy to imagine a world where every serious company in crypto eventually issues its own stablecoin. Which raises the obvious question: do we need more? Why we need more Stablecoins: 1. Financial inclusion: Even as the number of unbanked people falls, over 1.3 billion remain without access to banking, mostly in places with unstable currencies. Stablecoins…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 20:54