Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation. On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process. IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation. Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets. Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange. IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book. IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time. Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster. Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution. The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase. Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership. Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network. Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations. When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery. Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access. This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews. Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation. On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process. IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation. Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets. Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange. IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book. IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time. Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster. Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution. The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase. Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership. Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network. Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations. When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery. Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access. This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews. Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.

Irys Airdrop Draws Concern After One Entity Captures 20% of Supply

2025/11/30 01:50

Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation.

On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process.

IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens

According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation.

Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets.

Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange.

IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps

The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book.

IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time.

Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster.

Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution.

The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase.

Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection

The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership.

Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network.

Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations.

When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery.

Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access.

This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews.

Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14