PANews reported on January 1st that, in response to the recent accusations between NEO's two founders, Da Hongfei and Zhang Zhengwen, regarding each other's monopolizationPANews reported on January 1st that, in response to the recent accusations between NEO's two founders, Da Hongfei and Zhang Zhengwen, regarding each other's monopolization

NEO Founder Zhang Zhengwen: Da Hongfei misappropriated foundation resources to launch the new project EON, diluting the value of the NEO ecosystem.

2026/01/01 11:10
Okuma süresi: 2 dk

PANews reported on January 1st that, in response to the recent accusations between NEO's two founders, Da Hongfei and Zhang Zhengwen, regarding each other's monopolization of financial power and lack of transparency, Zhang Zhengwen (Erik Zhang) stated that Da Hongfei decided to use the resources and funds of the Neo Foundation (NF) to launch an independent new project, EON, and issue new tokens. Zhang Zhengwen believes this move presents a significant conflict of interest, not only diluting the value of the Neo ecosystem but also directly leading to the withdrawal of Neo mainnet resources. He has decided to return to full management of the Neo mainnet to defend the core rights of NEO/GAS holders. At the same time, Zhang Zhengwen released the current status of the accounts under his management.

  • On-chain transparent assets (NEO/GAS):

    • Protocol-level transparency: Currently, the vast majority of the Neo Foundation's NEO and GAS assets are publicly distributed across 21 initial node addresses and one multisignature wallet. These addresses are the cornerstone of the Neo protocol's operation, and the global community can conduct real-time audits at any time.

    • Asset Flow Explanation: Previously, during the period when Da Hongfei requested Erik to withdraw from the foundation's management, at Da Hongfei's request, approximately 8 million NEO/GAS tokens were transferred to multiple multi-signature addresses designated by Da Hongfei.

    • Internal Payment Standard Operating Procedure (SOP): To ensure the compliance of core asset usage, a strict four-step process has always been implemented: (1) NGD submits a budget request; (2) Da Hongfei approves the request; (3) Erik is responsible for the technical payment execution; and (4) the financial records are entered into. This process exists to ensure procedural justice for every core expenditure.

  • Opaque assets (risks associated with non-NEO/GAS assets):

    • Single-person control: Apart from the aforementioned transparent NEO/GAS, all auxiliary assets held by the Neo Foundation (including but not limited to BTC, ETH, and other ecosystem project tokens) are currently under the actual control of Da Hongfei.

    • Audit deficiencies: Zhang Zhengwen stated that these assets have remained in a "black box" state for many years, and Da Hongfei has yet to provide any verifiable financial statements, asset lists, or audit certificates.

Piyasa Fırsatı
NEO Logosu
NEO Fiyatı(NEO)
$2.858
$2.858$2.858
+0.81%
USD
NEO (NEO) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Paylaş
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28