By Alex Liu, Foresight News From JLP to Neutral To make money, the first step is often to find high-quality assets. It's no exaggeration to say that JLP is oneBy Alex Liu, Foresight News From JLP to Neutral To make money, the first step is often to find high-quality assets. It's no exaggeration to say that JLP is one

Annualized 15%+ and drawdown less than 2%, how does Neutral use institutional risk control to "steadily" reap JLP dividends?

2025/08/02 10:35

By Alex Liu, Foresight News

From JLP to Neutral

To make money, the first step is often to find high-quality assets. It's no exaggeration to say that JLP is one of the best assets in the entire crypto world. Its value tripled in the first year since its launch, with its largest drawdown being a 30% correction in March. This outstanding performance is accompanied by a massive fund volume exceeding $1 billion. How did it achieve this?

With an annualized return of over 15% and a drawdown of less than 2%, how does Neutral use institutional risk management to secure JLP dividends?

JLP price trends, data: coingecko

JLP stands for Jupiter Perpetual Liquidity Provider Token, the liquidity provider token for Jupiter perpetual contracts. Holding JLP is equivalent to depositing money into Jupiter to act as the counterparty to contract traders. If contract traders profit, JLP will lose money, and vice versa. Numerous similar products have repeatedly proven that over time, contract traders consistently lose money. This is JLP's first source of income. 75% of Jupiter perpetual contract trading fees return to JLP. This generous fee income has consistently maintained JLP's annualized income above 30%, sometimes even exceeding 50%. JLP itself is composed of 47% SOL, 8% ETH, 13% BTC, and 32% USDC, maintaining exposure to crypto assets. Consequently, in 2024, when SOL is strong, combined with the above two sources of income, JLP will more than triple. During the three months when SOL fell from $295 to below $100, JLP's limited risk exposure and the buffer provided by the aforementioned two types of returns resulted in a 30% drop. However, after SOL prices rebounded, JLP reached a new high.

Thus, JLP's losses stem from short-term profits made by futures traders in extreme market conditions (though statistics show they will eventually lose them...) and from the long-term weakening of crypto asset prices. The latter appears to be the only long-term risk. By hedging this risk, we can achieve a high-yield strategy with high-quality underlying assets.

Neutral is an institutional-grade on-chain hedge fund on Solana. It offers the following strategy:

With an annualized return of 15%+ and a drawdown of less than 2%, how does Neutral use institutional risk management to secure JLP dividends?

Users deposit USDC and convert it to JLP. They then pledge JLP in a lending agreement, borrow USDC, and then convert it to JLP. (Profit is achieved when the annualized return on JLP exceeds the interest paid on the loan.) Finally, using perpetual contracts (Drift) to short the crypto asset shares (SOL, ETH, BTC) corresponding to the JLP holdings makes the strategy risk-neutral (theoretically, no losses will be incurred due to price fluctuations).

The Neutral vault for this strategy currently has a TVL (total value locked) of over $12 million, an annualized return of over 15%, and a maximum drawdown generally under 2%.

Retail Investor Risks and Institutional Advantages

So why don't I execute this strategy myself instead of using a product like Neutral? There's no commission involved (Neutral charges a performance fee of 10-25% for various strategies, deducting a corresponding percentage from the profit).

The reason is simple: retail investors often lack the ability to properly manage the risks associated with complex strategy returns.

While executing the above strategies, short hedging carries the risk of margin calls and abnormal funding rates, while leveraged lending carries the risk of losses due to long-term interest rate inversions. Even if you stay awake and monitor the market, you may not have the spare funds to add margin or unwind your lending cycle in emergencies.

Institutional hedge funds, however, are monitored 24/7 by their teams and possess extensive experience and contingency plans for handling various systemic risks. Their risk management is indeed superior to that of retail investors. Returns are premised on the security of principal. Whether to maximize returns through a Degen model or sacrifice some returns for greater risk management security requires careful consideration based on your individual circumstances.

Project Overview

Let's talk about the Neutral project itself. It's not the only on-chain hedge fund on the market. We chose to introduce it because it's collaborating with the Solana Chinese community for promotion, making it a relatively reliable endorsement. Furthermore, it has an ongoing points system and is expected to launch a token offering. This allows you to earn strategic returns while also maximizing your investment opportunities through project airdrops. (The points calculation rule is: 1 point per $1 in assets over a year, equivalent to 1 point per day for a deposit of $365.)

With an annualized return of 15%+ and a drawdown of less than 2%, how does Neutral use institutional risk management to secure JLP dividends?

Neutral began as a winning project at the Solana Radar Hackathon and has since grown into a scalable emerging protocol with a TVL of nearly $36 million and nearly $2.5 million in user revenue. Founders Rick and Jared are experienced quantitative traders from Goldman Sachs and a top-three global hedge fund. On June 1st, Neutral announced it had secured $2 million in funding from Cumberland and a number of Solana ecosystem projects and participants.

In addition to its flagship JLP neutral strategy, Neutral also offers several other yield-generating strategies, including Hyperliquid rate arbitrage. It's important to note that not all strategies are risk-neutral. Strategies labeled "Directional" may fluctuate significantly with market conditions. Interested readers are encouraged to research these strategies.

Piyasa Fırsatı
ALEX Lab Logosu
ALEX Lab Fiyatı(ALEX)
$0.00111
$0.00111$0.00111
0.00%
USD
ALEX Lab (ALEX) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026

Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026

The post Solana Co-Founder Predicts Stablecoin Supply Could Top $1T by 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko predicts stablecoin
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/29 02:32
Tokenization and AI: The emergence of orbital cloud infrastructure | Opinion

Tokenization and AI: The emergence of orbital cloud infrastructure | Opinion

Evaluating key energy requirements to support the growth in AI-driven tokenization necessitating orbital cloud data centers.
Paylaş
Crypto.news2025/12/29 02:04