The post ‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.   The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies. However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation.  Source: X Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest.  “What is clear is that Mr. Sacks, directly or through Craft, has retained 20 crypto and 449 A.I.-related investments, according to The Times analysis.” In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added,  “In September, BitGo filed for an initial public offering. Craft owns 7.8 percent of the company, according to financial filings, which would be worth more than $130 million at BitGo’s 2023 valuation.” BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI). However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act. Sacks’ crypto policy push Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups. However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year.  As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking.  Still, the strategic BTC… The post ‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.   The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies. However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation.  Source: X Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest.  “What is clear is that Mr. Sacks, directly or through Craft, has retained 20 crypto and 449 A.I.-related investments, according to The Times analysis.” In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added,  “In September, BitGo filed for an initial public offering. Craft owns 7.8 percent of the company, according to financial filings, which would be worth more than $130 million at BitGo’s 2023 valuation.” BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI). However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act. Sacks’ crypto policy push Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups. However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year.  As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking.  Still, the strategic BTC…

‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report

2025/12/01 19:33

David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.  

The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies.

However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation. 

Source: X

Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny

The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest. 

In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added, 

BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI).

However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act.

Sacks’ crypto policy push

Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups.

However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year. 

As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking. 

Still, the strategic BTC reserve and market structure bill has not yet crossed the finishing line. 

As such, top crypto leaders threw their support behind him, led by Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino. The world’s largest stablecoin issuer chief said Sacks has done a good job in supporting U.S. crypto and added

Perianne Boring, a partner at Off the Chain Capital, echoed a similar stance, calling it a coordinated attack on crypto. 

Source: X


Final Thoughts

  • Sacks has denied any conflict of interest, and the NYT claims that he pushed crypto policies to benefit his firm, Craft Ventures. 
  • The crypto industry, led by Tether CEO, defended Sacks and condemned the report as a coordinated attack against the sector. 
Next: AAVE: $160 support in danger? THIS signals a deeper downside ahead

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/nothing-burger-david-sacks-blasts-nyts-conflict-of-interest-report/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52